City council discusses grant spending
Marietta City Council’s finance committee had an initial look at the 2014 Community Development Block Grant budget Monday afternoon, with recommendations on spending the annual entitlement from the city administration.
City development director Andy Coleman reviewed the budget, noting the document is based on Marietta receiving a projected $345,743 in CDBG funding for 2014 from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development-the same amount the city received this year.
“But it’s possible we could see a 2 percent increase from HUD next year,” he said.
Coleman said after subtracting a total $109,687 in costs for housing programs and housing administration, $236,056 was left to fund $436,988 worth of other requested projects in the proposed CDBG budget.
Among the city administration’s recommended project funding is $69,148 for the community development department’s oversight of the block grant; $37,000 for operation of the local Community Action Bus Lines; $35,000 for the 2014 citywide asphalt paving project; $30,000 for a sidewalk repair program; $15,000 for Marietta Main Street support; and $12,500 for police bike and foot patrols in all four wards.
“I would like your recommendations or what you would like to see changed in this budget, and will come back in two weeks to review those recommendations,” Coleman told the committee members after his initial rundown of the proposed CDBG budget.
Councilman Tom Vukovic, D-4th Ward, and chairman of the finance committee, noted the budget has to be submitted to HUD by Nov. 15.
“There are always significant demands for our CDBG monies,” he said. “We’ll have to make some tough decisions. There is no easy answer.”
Vukovic said the committee would continue consideration of the 2014 CDBG budget next week.
In other business Monday, the streets and transportation committee continued to discuss the adoption of an Ohio Environmental Protection Agency-recommended ordinance to address the quality of the city’s stormwater runoff.
The city’s current land development ordinance already covers many stormwater-related issues, but Kathy Davis, stormwater specialist with the Washington Soil and Water Conservation District, said that ordinance does not address the quality of runoff water, which is now required by the Ohio EPA.
City law director Paul Bertram III noted the city’s land development ordinance does contain measures pertaining to the quantity of stormwater runoff allowed from new construction, and the current ordinance also addresses building in landslip-prone areas.
“But now the state is demanding that we also have a water quality ordinance in place by the end of this year,” he said. “If not we will be fined for non-compliance.”
Davis said a fine could be levied against the city by the Ohio EPA for every day the water quality ordinance is not in effect. She did not know the amount of that daily fine.
Vukovic said he’s concerned that the recommended water quality ordinance would completely supplant the city’s land development ordinance that took a past council more than a year of special meetings to put together.
“I don’t think we should just throw the whole thing out,” he said.
Davis agreed that the water quantity and slip-prone areas in the current city ordinance should remain in force in addition to new water quality regulations that are being required of cities across the state by the Ohio EPA.
“Every community is unique,” she said. “Marietta does have water quantity and landslip areas that need to be addressed. Ohio EPA just wants the water quality issue addressed also.”