Grand jury clears officer in Jan. mall shooting
PARKERSBURG – Just days after two Parkersburg Police officers shot and wounded an armed suspect, a special grand jury unanimously decided not to indict a city police detective who shot and killed a man at Grand Central Mall in January.
The same grand jury also voted not to indict another Parkersburg officer accused of using excessive force against a handcuffed suspect in August. However, the officer, Patrolman Jay Hart, has been disciplined internally, Police Chief Joe Martin said.
The grand jury reports were issued Thursday morning, when the panel did return indictments against 17 individuals.
But Parkersburg Police Detective P.M. Edelen was not among them.
On Jan. 14, Edelen and other local law enforcement officers were engaged in a training exercise at the mall food court when a man later identified as 27-year-old John Ragalyi of Newport allegedly stole a woman’s purse. Investigators said the woman called for help, and Edelen and fellow Parkersburg Detective J.M. Stalnaker gave chase, identifying themselves as police officers.
Both Ragalyi and Steven L. Pfalzgraf, 24, of Parkersburg, fled into the parking lot and got in Pfalzgraf’s car. Stalnaker attempted to grab the keys from the ignition, and Pfalzgraf put the vehicle in motion, dragging the officer with him.
When Stalnaker got loose, Pfalzgraf turned the car toward Edelen and drove forward, investigators said. The detective fired his gun multiple times at the vehicle, fatally wounding Pfalzgraf.
According to the grand jury report, the panel “unanimously determined that Detective Pat Edelen acted appropriately in self-defense and defense of others in his actions in firing his weapon at the vehicle driven by Steven Pfalzgraf and did not violate the laws of the State of West Virginia.”
An internal review by the city police also found Edelen acted appropriately under the department’s lethal force policy. Martin said Thursday he was pleased the grand jury agreed and thanked them for their service.
“I was pretty confident Sgt. Edelen did no wrong and was going to be exonerated,” he said. “Nonetheless, it’s still a necessary hurdle that we need to present those facts and findings to that body of the judicial system and get their stamp of approval as well.”
Wood County Prosecuting Attorney Jason Wharton said it’s always been his policy to take officer-involved shootings to a grand jury to allow members of the public to review the evidence, since his office often works closely with police. The West Virginia State Police turned the findings of their investigation over to Wharton’s office in June, and this was the first grand jury empaneled since that material was received.
Tuesday’s shooting of 42-year-old Christopher Paul Johnson, of Parkersburg, by two city police officers is also expected to go before a grand jury eventually.
The grand jury on Thursday also reported no indictment against Parkersburg Police Patrolman Jay Hart.
In October, a lawsuit was filed against Hart, Bosley, an unnamed officer, Martin, Mayor Bob Newell and the city by Parkersburg resident John Michael Sadler Jr., who claimed he was punched and choked by Hart while being processed at the Parkersburg Police Department following Sadler’s arrest on a charge of driving under the influence. Bosley and another officer were in the room but did nothing to stop Hart, the lawsuit claimed.
The lawsuit was settled last month by the city’s insurance carrier for $80,000, with every defendant but Hart dismissed.
It wasn’t Hart’s first encounter with the suspect, who he’d shot five years earlier in an incident in which Sadler reportedly threatened to kill a family member and then himself and pointed a shotgun at the officer. An internal investigation determined the shooting was justified.
Last fall, Wharton took the case to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of West Virginia and an FBI agent was assigned to investigate.
“My office was advised within the last 30 days that the U.S. Attorney’s office was declining prosecution,” Wharton said Thursday.
Hart remains on administrative duty after an internal review determined he violated a department policy.