Mobile Version: mobile.mariettatimes.com
RSS:
Marietta Weather Forecast, OH
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified EZToUseBigBook Web
News  Obituaries  Local Sports  Rally  Community Info.  CU Galleries  Polls  Jobs  Local Classifieds  Blogs  Local Real Estate


  • Pirates Report
  • Affiliated Sites
  • Newspapers in Education
Local News

Tobacco prevention program gets reprieve

$25,000 grant assures operation continues until Sept. 25

by Kate York, kyork@mariettatimes.com
POSTED: July 4, 2009

The Washington County Tobacco Prevention Program has received a grant that will keep operations going through Sept. 25, but after that the future is still uncertain.

The program, which has helped more than 1,000 area residents stop using tobacco and served more than 10,000 youth through prevention programs, was scheduled to end Tuesday due to funding shifts.

Now, a Rural Hospital Flexibility Grant (FLEX) grant from the Ohio Department of Health will keep full services going for three more months while employees apply for additional funding.

"We have (smoking cessation) classes scheduled, we'll be able to provide materials at no cost, we're moving ahead," said director Stephanie Davis. "For now, we're keeping our jobs and more importantly we'll be able to provide services to the community."

The program had been surviving, on a limited basis, on an American Legacy Foundation grant since a bill passed in the state last year abolished the Ohio Tobacco Prevention Foundation. The foundation's $270 million endowment was mostly diverted to an economic stimulus package with $40 million given to the Ohio Department of Health to oversee tobacco prevention programs.

The $270 million came from Ohio's settlement with major tobacco companies and provided funding to prevention programs across the state, including more than half of the $190,000 budget for Washington County's program, based at Selby General Hospital.

Davis said services are needed now more than ever, following an April rise in the federal tobacco tax from 39 cents to $1.01 per pack, spurring more people to try to quit.

"We've definitely seen an increase-we've been bombarded," she said. "We've had 75 to 100 individuals in the last month or two and I think we're going to see more making the decision to quit."

Most of those people will need the help of a cessation program, Davis said.

"If it was easy to do, everyone would just do it on their own," she said. "It's so highly addictive. People need help and we have to have a program in place."

Along with helping smokers quit, the program aides people using all other forms of tobacco as well.

"In our area it's really staggering the number of people who use smokeless tobacco," Davis said. "They believe it to be safer but it can have three times the nicotine as a pack of cigarettes."

The program's three remaining employees, down from five, are awaiting passage of the state budget, like many other agencies.

Funds from the Ohio Department of Health have been requested but until the budget passes it's unknown if the department will have the money available. The program has also applied for funding from other sources, said Davis.

Jennifer Offenberger, marketing director for the Memorial Health System, which includes Selby, has said if the existing program ends there are likely to be some cessation services reinstated at Marietta Memorial Hospital.

 
Share:
Facebook  MySpace  Digg  Stumble    Mixx  Fark  del.icio.us   LiveSpaces
 
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-10 | Post a comment
MichaelJMcFadden
07-05-09 4:05 PM
Rocker asked, "why isn't the mainstream media reporting on the internal report by the World Health Organization that says, "no link between passive smoking and lung cancer"????"

Rocker, partly because it's nothing new: that report came out over ten years ago and was widely ignored then... except for a big press release contradicting its own findings. The most interesting thing about that study was that it actually found only ONE scientifically significant conclusion: that children of smokers got 22% **LESS** lung cancer later in life than matched children of nonsmokers! The fact that this was rather sloppily covered up in the press summary/abstract as simply showing "no association" shows the amount of pressure applied against such politically incorrect results even back in 1998.

- MUM

MichaelJMcFadden
07-05-09 3:57 PM
So they say ""We've definitely seen an increase-we've been bombarded ... We've had 75 to 100 individuals in the last month or two... "

Given the likelihood of at least a bit of self-serving presentation there, those numbers probably boil down to about 1 caller per day. And unfortunately they've only got three staff people now to handle that caller wheras they used to have five paid staffers to handle fewer than one caller.

And people wonder why the Governor decided to take the money away before they squandered the rest of it?

Michael J. McFadden, Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"

mrsmom
07-05-09 4:51 AM
BTW, I only took Chantix for a month after quitting.

mrsmom
07-05-09 4:50 AM
Generalsn, my mother passed away last year only a month after her 67th birthday. She was thin, but she was a chain-smoker. Two weeks later I went on Chantix to end my 9 year addition to cigarettes. I had tried many other times to quit unsuccesfully. Chantix helped me so much. I still had the cravings, but no where near as strong. I have been cigarette-free for almost 10 months now and I can breathe again. I know that Chantix, like all other drugs, will affect different people in different ways, but it helped me and many others.

rocker
07-04-09 8:12 PM
Yeah I thought Obama wasnt going to raise taxes on anyone under $250,000. Ohh the tobacco tax is only on smokers which are a minority of about 24 million people. Tobacco users of all kinds should remember these people that voted for this tobacco tax in the next election. And another thing, why isn't the mainstream media reporting on the internal report by the World Health Organization that says, "no link between passive smoking and lung cancer"????

surprised
07-04-09 3:18 PM
Wheres Freddy?

ichoosefreedom
07-04-09 2:06 PM
2 things: first the state needs to stop paying for NRT products-they do NOT work (study showed a failure rate of 98.4%). Pay for counseling and support but not these deceptively ineffective products. Second: now these 3 employees know how the bar employees feel-remember smoking bans don't hurt the hospitality industry. ANOTHER lied of the Tobacco Control cartel.

Goodoleme
07-04-09 1:05 PM
They used the tobacco settlement money for everything, except for what it was intended to be used for

generalsn
07-04-09 12:12 PM
Since these bans are all about health, they should be required to put the Chantix warning on all of the government issued “No smoking” signs to prevent lawsuits by forcefully coercing residents into using a dangerous product.

****marketwatch****/story/fda-orders-harsher-warnings-on-zyban-chantix-2009711538360

antislie
07-04-09 11:31 AM
Perhaps they should clean house at the ODH for wasting money that could be put to better use than pushing nicotine for the pharmaceutical co whose RWJF foundation funded big bucks for anti smoking. ODH programs are being cut yet they fund you 25,000...go figure

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
 
News  Obituaries  Local Sports  Rally  Community Info.  CU Galleries  Polls  Jobs  Local Classifieds  Blogs  Local Real Estate