Dogs get care: Psychologist says Newport case could be a matter of animal hoarding
By Evan Bevins, ebevins@mariettatimes.comFact Box
What is animal hoarding?
The following criteria are used to define animal hoarding:
More than the typical number of companion animals.
Inability to provide even minimal standards of nutrition, sanitation, shelter and veterinary care, with this neglect often resulting in starvation, illness and death.
Denial of the inability to provide this minimum care and the impact of that failure on the animals, the household and human occupants of the dwelling.
For more information: The Hoarding of Animals Research Consortium, http://www.tufts.edu/vet/cfa/hoarding/index.html.
The recent case of alleged animal cruelty in Newport has many of the characteristics of animal hoarding, according to a national expert on the subject.
"Although it may seem unusual in the community, it's the kind of story we see pretty regularly" at the national level, said Dr. Randall Lockwood, senior vice president for Anti-Cruelty Field Services with the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.
Lockwood, a psychologist based with the ASPCA in Washington, D.C., is not involved in the local situation, but discussed animal hoarding cases in general.
"Several of these cases a day come across my desk," he said. "We estimate there probably are at least 5,000 new cases of this each year in the country."
An animal hoarder is someone who accumulates more animals than they can care for while remaining oblivious to the condition of the animals and the negative impact on the quality of life for the human beings involved, Lockwood said. It is not unusual for a hoarder's house to have animal feces in the eating or sleeping areas, he said.
"It is not just kind people who get in over their heads, which is often how this is characterized," Lockwood said.
Animal hoarders may hoard other things as well, and the condition can be linked to additional psychological disorders, Lockwood said. As in the Washington County case, there can be issues for Children or Adult Protective Services if the hoarder has children or a dependent adult living with them, he said.
Local humane officer Butch Morris said hoarding cases aren't frequent in Washington County, but authorities have seen their share of them. There are a couple of situations Morris said he is watching to make sure the individuals don't take in more animals and become a problem.
"If you go over seven or eight dogs, then I'm going to be looking hard," he said.
However, Morris noted there is no law in Ohio limiting the number of animals an individual can own. His office's concern is that the animals are properly cared for and licensed.
Lockwood said hoarders usually cannot be dealt with just by taking the animals away.
"Virtually all of them will begin again without close supervision," he said.
Lockwood said he does not necessarily advocate jail for hoarders but thinks probation conditions prohibiting them from owning more animals should be in place.
|
singlemom
|
|
|---|---|
|
09-17-09 9:50 AM
|
Of course to someone who didnt do anything wrong the psych ward would be terrifying to think about. But to someone who faces jail time they may prefer a stint in a mental hospital. My point was that everytime we get a big story of neglect, or abuse a psychologist comes in and gives some reasoning behind the crime. Plain and simple the man needs punishment, no matter what the reasoning. I hope they find out more info on the rest of the family soon, im interested in hearing their reasonings has to hwy they let their mother live that way.
|
|
singlemom
|
|
|
09-15-09 9:07 PM
|
Whether Sharp's reasonings are mental or just neglect doesnt matter, either way he needs punishment. I get tired of hearing the psychological reasonings behind everyones wrong doings. Anymore if a psychiatrist says you have a "mental condition" then you're babied and put in a psych ward for recovery...face it, todays world is just lazy and pathetic and will find any excuse to rationale what they did or didn't do.
|
|
armybrat
|
|
|
09-15-09 12:27 PM
|
The woman is now in good hands and receiving the care she needs. That is why nothing is being said about her. The animals are the issue that will keep this case public, since nothing can be said about the woman right now. I still think her son's and I don't mean only one son should be taken to court for letting their mother live in such squalid conditions.
|
|
MartyMarachino
|
|
|
09-15-09 12:06 PM
|
Who says anyone HAS to care more about people than pets? If you dont have any people to take care of, why not take care of pets? I take very good care of the people for whom I am responsible, none live in my house. I also take better care of my pets than most people take care of their children. The "point" is, no one should voluntarily take care of more people OR pets than they can handle.
|
|
BeaglePuppie1064
|
|
|
09-15-09 11:56 AM
|
...oh...You were making a "point"...I'm sorry I thought you were expressing an opinion...
|
|
Parrothead
|
|
|
09-15-09 11:46 AM
|
MartyMarachino & BeaglePuppie1064 – THANK YOU for making my point for me!
|
|
BeaglePuppie1064
|
|
|
09-15-09 11:21 AM
|
Well said Marty...You don't get a nasty disease from kissing dogs, and you always know where and with who your dogs mouth has been!
|
|
Parrothead
|
|
|
09-15-09 10:53 AM
|
MartyMarachino – just make sure that they didn’t just finish licking their own butt before they kiss you! And do your dogs practice abstinence or do you support using birth control methods? LOL
|
|
MartyMarachino
|
|
|
09-15-09 10:47 AM
|
Well, my dogs never wrote on walls, started a fire, wrecked my car, used drugs, committed crimes, or came home pregnant. When they kiss me, they mean it...every time! They don't cheat and they dont lie. AND, you can leave them home alone, even when they're babies! Hahaha! I'll take dogs any day.
|
|
Parrothead
|
|
|
09-15-09 10:27 AM
|
Face the facts Tessie, Americans have gone nuts and value animals more than human life anymore. Animal rights activist have been witnessed stepping on a homeless person to spit on someone wearing fur. Ridiculous and sad.
|
|
Tessie
|
|
|
09-15-09 10:26 AM
|
We shouldn't be so quick to judge this woman's son. Who's to say that the hoarding of these animals hasn't been a long standing problem for the elderly woman? Who's to say that it isn't a part of dementia? And who knows if it's part of longstanding OCD? You can make all the argument in the world about why the son should have controlled the situation, but I doubt it's a black and white issue. There's always more to it than meets the eye. Mothers and sons sometimes have a very complex relationship.
|
|
Tessie
|
|
|
09-15-09 10:13 AM
|
Parrothead, the woman is hospitalized and being cared for. Privacy laws prevent the discussion of the woman's condition. There are no privacy laws for cats and dogs.
|
|
AaronL
|
|
|
09-15-09 10:06 AM
|
You answered your own question Parrot, was'nt such a long walk either.
|
|
Parrothead
|
|
|
09-15-09 9:20 AM
|
Why is there more attention being given to the dogs than to the woman who was also living here and taken to the hosptial. Has society actually gotten to the point that they value a dog more than a human?
|



