Toxic waterways
Report says more needs to be done for Ohio, Muskingum riversBy Justin McIntosh, jmcintosh@mariettatimes.com
Article Photos
Fact Box
For more
information
To see the report: environmentohio.org , click on "Wasting Our Waterways" report.
Pollution
at a glance
31.06 million (pounds of toxic discharge) - Ohio River
14.09 million (pounds of toxic discharge) - New River (North Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia)
12.71 million (pounds of toxic discharge) - Mississippi River
4.99 million (pounds of toxic discharge) - Muskingum River
Source: Environment Ohio's "Wasting Our Waterways" report.
Article PDFs
READ REPORT :Wasting Our Waterways: Toxic Industrial Pollution and the Unfulfilled Promise of the Clean Water Act
The two rivers that converge at Marietta are among the 10 most polluted in the country, according to a new environmental report.
The information, culled from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Toxics Release Inventory from 2007, shows that more toxic chemicals are dumped into the Ohio River than any other waterway in the country. The Muskingum River, meanwhile, was the ninth most polluted waterway, according to the report.
What that data means about the safety of the waterways, though, is getting mixed analysis from different environmental groups.
Amanda Moore, field organizer with Environment Ohio, the group that put together the report, said the data proves what was common knowledge where she grew up in Bridgeport, along the Ohio River.
"It's not a clean river to swim in," she said.
It also shows, Moore said, that more needs to be done to clean up the country's waterways.
Environment Ohio is using the data to call on the EPA and Ohio's Congressional leaders to restore the protections of the Clean Water Act by passing the Clean Water Restoration Act, and to issue tougher permitting regulations and enforcement.
After all, Moore said, the Ohio River is ranked first in the nation for most cancer-causing toxic discharges, with 96,669 pounds in 2007. Overall, the river had more than 31 million pounds of toxics dumped into it in 2007, the report says.
The Muskingum River, meanwhile, had an overall total of a little less than 5 million pounds of toxics discharged into it.
Kraton Polymers LLC in Belpre was the biggest discharger along the Ohio River in the Buckeye State, Moore said, with about 577,000 pounds in 2007. Eramet Marietta Inc. was No. 2 in the state, with more than 180,000 pounds. But neither facility could be located on a graph in the report listing the top 20 facilities.
AK Steel Corp Coshocton Works in Coshocton led the way for the Muskingum River.
Among the toxic chemicals discharged by facilities are lead, mercury and dioxin, the report says. Exposure to these chemicals is linked to cancer, developmental disorders and reproductive disorders.
Linda Oros, spokeswoman with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, said the agency closely monitors which chemicals are discharged into waterways - and at what levels - to ensure safe rivers, streams and lakes.
"We're concerned about (the Ohio River) as well, and have been for a number of years," she said.
Oros said companies are allowed to discharge a certain amount of chemicals according to their permits, which are determined based on agency guidelines for safety.
"The amount allowed to be discharged is determined by scientific monitoring," she said. "It varies from facility to facility, and chemical to chemical."
Last year alone, the agency had 49 enforcement orders, doled out $1.28 million in penalties, and $997,000 in supplemental and environmental project penalties, which are projects businesses are required to do to improve the environment in lieu of fines.
Eric Fitch, director of Marietta College's environmental science program, said the latest study shows how little progress has been made cleaning up the country's waterways since the Clean Water Act was passed in the 1970s.
"We've lost ground," he said. "While in recent months CWA enforcement has been ticking up in terms of importance, we see more and more the bodies of water in the United States are not protected, and they should be. It's the law; it's the law of the land going on 40 years."
Kristyn Robinson, watershed coordinator for the Friends of the Lower Muskingum River, an organization formed to restore, protect and maintain the river, disagreed about the Muskingum River's safety as it relates to swimming or fishing.
"I don't believe that's true," she said. "We are not the cleanest river, but we have good fish populations in our river, healthy fish populations of sensitive species."
Robinson cited a 2006 report by the Ohio EPA that surveyed the Muskingum River from Coshocton down to the mouth in Marietta.
"They found overall a healthy river," she said. "They did water samples, biological samples, habitat assessments.... And they found that overall our river is in good health."
Robinson also pointed out that the Environment Ohio report also doesn't specify the Muskingum River as having large amounts of cancer-causing toxics or developmental inhibitors.
According to the Environment Ohio report, the Ohio River leads the nation for having the highest total of cancer-causing chemicals discharged into it, with 96,699 pounds; is fourth in the country for having the most developmental toxicant releases, with 37,364 pounds; and is first in the nation for having the most reproductive toxicant releases, with 29,665 pounds.
The Muskingum River doesn't even appear in the top 20 of any of those lists. The river does show up as having the 32nd most developmental toxicant releases, and the 45h most reproductive toxicants, while not showing up in the top 50 most cancer-causing chemicals discharged list.
"So while we have a toxic release mass amount, the actual types of toxic materials being released into the Muskingum River aren't the highly toxic, cancer-causing materials," Robinson said. "That really makes sense to me. We would not be finding sensitive fish species if we had toxic chemicals in our river."
The chemical found most often in the Muskingum River, Robinson said, is nitrogen, which poses some toxicity, but not at a high level.
The more nitrogen in the water decreases the amount of oxygen and species will uptake in nitrogen," she said. "We don't have fish kills, though. There's a sufficient amount of oxygen."
|
saveamerica
|
|
|---|---|
|
11-02-09 8:30 PM
|
thats the price we pay for these chemical plants, everyone wants to high paying jobs no matter the cost to our river
|
|
Parrothead
|
|
|
11-01-09 9:35 PM
|
Marietta will soon be just like Youngstown.
|
|
armybrat
|
|
|
11-01-09 7:55 PM
|
Youngstown's economy is bottoming out big time. No jobs up that way.
|
|
digmedia
|
|
|
11-01-09 12:59 PM
|
Quote by GOTOSCHOOL "In Youngstown- growing up- the mahoning river was always on fire...but the economy was 'booming'..." How's the Youngstown Economy these days?
|
|
mcphilosopher
|
|
|
11-01-09 12:49 PM
|
Orchardfarmer, You mean to tell me you have never noticed that lovely brown haze that hangs over this valley? I have been to, and lived in NYC, Pittsburgh, Buffalo, Charlotte, Atlanta, LA, and Boston. That haze you see hanging over the big cities also hangs out here. How people don't notice it perplexes me to an unexplainable extent.
|
|
DrDan
|
|
|
11-01-09 12:35 AM
|
Oh well all the industry is closing down so perhaps the rivers will once again be clean when they are history.
|
|
telefonica
|
|
|
10-31-09 11:40 PM
|
I live in Charlotte and I've never seen a brown haze here over the city mr orchardfarmer. 90% of the time here I wake up to a gorgeous carolina blue sky, the other 10% rain but that's still better than coughing up my lungs every mornng.
|
|
bwc511
|
|
|
10-31-09 6:14 PM
|
So. it is on the water!
|
|
Sarek
|
|
|
10-31-09 6:06 PM
|
Would anyone think that maybe this issue has more to do with people not wanting to come to Marietta to work than old school buildings? Maybe if we build new marinas and locks, the waterways would automatically be cleaner. Let's get Jack Moberg's opinion on this one. As an unemployed executive, his opinion matters more than anyone else's.
|
|
asknot
|
|
|
10-31-09 5:36 PM
|
Just because you don't necessarily always see it, doesn't mean it's not there. Ask a Dr. when they move to this area what they think of the air/water quality here.
|
|
StreetProse
|
|
|
10-31-09 5:20 PM
|
Orchardfarmer has turned in a record-setting performance for "Most strawmen in one argument". Wow, you've been to all those cities? That hardly makes you an expert...give us all a break and get over yourself. This report just re-affirms what we've all been smelling and tasting for years now. It would take a dull-sensed moron not to realize something isn't right. Never expect big business to do anything less than the best when it comes to giving the community an all-out screwjob.
|
|
Orchardfarmer
|
|
|
10-31-09 4:31 PM
|
asknot, I found the link to the report from the enviro-group - but no link to the EPA data sources. As far as fact-checking on this article goes, I could write up a report, fake data, put a fancy name on it like "Ohio Scientists Working Group" and it appears that this newspaper would publish my "results." MCPhilosopher - I've visited Atlanta, New York, LA, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Charlotte, Detroit, etc. Our air is NOT even in the same league as those cities, where you can see a brown haze over the city. Why do people take a perverse pride in believing that you have "the worst air", "the worst water", "the worst air", or "the worst schools"? Either people who believe this are simply willing to say anything to make a political point, or they have very dull lives which the idea of living in "the worst" place enlivens. If you truly believe that this place is so bad, then why don't you move to paradise?
|
|
GOTOSCHOOL
|
|
|
10-31-09 3:22 PM
|
In Youngstown- growing up- the mahoning river was always on fire...but the economy was 'booming'...
|
|
rocker
|
|
|
10-31-09 2:35 PM
|
asknot, no thanks. I'm not into catfish that much.
|
|
ResidentofMarietta
|
|
|
10-31-09 2:10 PM
|
While we are talking about what gets dumped into our rivers, let's not forget about all the farm chemichals that run off into the river as eall as all the homes and cotteges that still dump raw sewage right to the river.
|
|
Parrothead
|
|
|
10-31-09 1:54 PM
|
It's not the toxins making me sick. It reading the posts on this thread!
|
|
switcher
|
|
|
10-31-09 1:47 PM
|
While it may not be deadly toxic it's still not as clean as it could be. Some kind of action besides fining companies that lobby our congressmen needs to be done.
|
|
mcphilosopher
|
|
|
10-31-09 1:39 PM
|
Eric Fitch is right. The EPA has no claws here. How can you say the organization is working when we have these waterways, and when OUR air is among the worst in the country? The EPA has the teeth of a newborn baby, and as for claws, a cat after a trip to the vet is more dangerous. These companies make money poisoning us, and as long as they pay off the governmental agencies, its good business for them to look the other way, at OUR expense.
|
|
asknot
|
|
|
10-31-09 1:17 PM
|
Rocker, that's altight, I'll just enjoy throwing them back. I'll put a few on ice for you if you want! You could probably put some noxcema on them to clear up their "pimples". lol
|
|
rocker
|
|
|
10-31-09 1:11 PM
|
Asknot- you would have to eat 23.2 pounds (based on a weight of 163lbs) of fish a week contaminated with mercury before it would have any effect on you. Lol, just cut out the sores on the fish and you'll be fine.
|
|
asknot
|
|
|
10-31-09 12:49 PM
|
Orchardfarmer, why don't you actually read the article before ranting and pointing fingers. I bet if you look real hard you'll find the link TWICE! I'll take his word over yours though. Just because the river isn't dirty enough to catch fire, doesn't mean its as clean as it needs to be. My friends and I catfish in both rivers. And I'd say 1 out of 3 we pull in have open sores on them. Definitely nothing I'd eat.
|
|
armybrat
|
|
|
10-31-09 12:31 PM
|
Let's not forget the large truck farms who water their plants directly from the Muskingum and Ohio Rivers. We have eaten produce from these farms all our lives. Why is it that sometimes our drinking water smalls strongly of bleach?
|
|
Orchardfarmer
|
|
|
10-31-09 11:37 AM
|
As to the quote by Eric Fitch - you clearly do not remember when the Cuyhoga river caught on fire in the late 1960's because the water was so bad. Anyone remember Weirton/Steubenville from those days and the need to turn on your headlights when driving through those towns at noon? The Clean Air and Clean Water Acts have made a huge difference! I question seriously why MC trusts you to lead an environmental "science" program if you have such a biased, activist view of the facts.
|
|
Orchardfarmer
|
|
|
10-31-09 11:34 AM
|
Another thing: Look at the wording. "Among the toxic chemicals". Ok, so lead and mercury were discharged. How much? Did someone dump 2 old batteries into the river and have to report them as "toxic lead"? Or were hundreds of thousands of pounds dumped in. It makes a difference! Give us some useful numbers, Justin, or a link to the original EPA data - not the enviro-group's self-serving report!
|
|
Orchardfarmer
|
|
|
10-31-09 11:28 AM
|
Talk about lazy reporting! Tell us which chemicals, Justin. Just because an Ohio enviromental group wants to label these rivers "the most polluted" doesn't mean that they really are. The Ohio has huge water volume - naturally it can handle more "toxic" chemicals than smaller rivers. As mentioned, nitrogen is toxic - when highly concentrated as a liquid or a gas. But all the food you eat has nitrogen as a major, safe component, and you couldn't live without a substantial daily intake of nitrogen. This is just sensationalism PR put out by this enviro-group. Justin, find the original EPA report and tell us which chemicals and how many pounds, eh?
|



