New toxic release report
Environmental clean ups, recession play key roles for local plants in ’08By Justin McIntosh, jmcintosh@mariettatimes.com
Article Photos
Fact Box
Washington County's top five
The top five facilities in Washington County with the highest on-site disposal or other chemical releases in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 2008 Toxic Release Inventory Report are:
American Electric Power's Muskingum River plant - 10.2 million pounds.
Eramet Marietta Inc. - 5.49 million pounds.
American Municipal Power Ohio, Richard H. Gorsuch Plant - 1.4 million pounds.
Kraton Polymers U.S. LLC: 1.51 million pounds.
Globe Metallurgical Inc.: 394,774 pounds.
Source: www.epa.gov/tri
Washington County plants and factories released more than half a million pounds fewer chemicals into the environment in 2008 than the previous year, according to a new U.S. Environmental Protection Agency report.
Data from the Toxic Release Inventory show what's been happening with the individual facilities in recent years, said Eric Fitch, director of environmental science program at Marietta College.
"It makes sense," he said. "We not only had plants doing some cleanup, but we've had plants closing down. We've lost generation of the materials from simply plant operation. Remember, with plants like Eramet, they were actually shutting down generation prior to this year."
Fitch said the trend is likely to be further exacerbated next year when the 2009 TRI report is released, since this year saw many facilities stop production, or at least curtail output due to the economic downturn.
The Toxic Release Inventory is compiled every year by the U.S. EPA and contains detailed information on nearly 650 chemicals and chemical categories that are disposed either through the air, water or land by about 22,000 industrial and federal facilities.
Data found in the report is not necessarily meant as a guide to how polluted or toxic the air, land or water near these facilities are, Fitch said.
"The TRI is a little deceptive because it should be more properly labeled the potential-to-be-released toxic instead of the released toxics because a lot of these are generated and then processed or handled," Fitch said. "What's actually released to the environment is a fraction of what's actually generated because much of it is actually captured or processed or otherwise neutralized on- or off-site."
The decrease in overall releases mostly stems from the top two facilities, American Electric Power's Muskingum River Plant in Beverly and Eramet Marietta on Ohio 7. Many of the other facilities in the top five actually increased their releases, according to historic TRI data.
- American Municipal Power Ohio's Richard H. Gorsuch plant on Ohio 7, released 1.4 million pounds in 2008, which ranked it as the third highest on the TRI list. But in 2007 the company released 1.31 million pounds. Officials with AMP Ohio were unavailable for comment Wednesday.
- Kraton Polymers U.S., LLC, of Belpre, also saw an increase over the previous year's list. In 2008, Kraton released 1.15 million pounds, compared to 1 million in 2007.
- Globe Metallurgical Inc., of Beverly, also saw a slight increase, with 394,000 pounds released in 2008 compared to 324,000 in 2007.
For Washington County, the Beverly AEP plant remains the top disposer of chemicals, with a little more than 10.2 million pounds released. Most of that is released through the air, with about 8.8 million pounds disposed of in that manner.
Still, just like the overall Washington County trend of about 600,000 fewer pounds of chemicals released, AEP's local plant also saw a reduction in chemicals released in 2008 over 2007.
In 2007, the plant released 10.7 million pounds. The 10.2 million pounds released in 2008 is still higher, though, than any other year - besides 2007 - since 1998, according to the EPA data.
"Typically TRI numbers for utilities are a reflection of volume; if we generate less electricity and burn less coal then our numbers will fluctuate year to year," said Melissa McHenry, an AEP spokesperson. "Part of that is likely related to the economic downturn at the end of the year."
Similar trends were also noticed at other top releasers in the county, including Eramet.
In 2008, Eramet released 5.49 million pounds, compared to 5.73 million in 2007.
"That's a correlation with our Furnace 1 project," said Joy Frank-Collins, spokesperson with Eramet. "We rebuilt our Furnace 1 in May 2008, and it certainly decreased the emissions from that furnace dramatically."
Unlike AEP's Muskingum River plant, though, Eramet's releases are drastically down compared to releases over the last 20 years, particularly those releases from 2000-1987, when the company released between 11.8 million and 18.6 million pounds every year.
Frank-Collins said 2009's releases will continue this trend when those figures are released next year.
"The major reason is because of the indefinite idling of the Northside operations, and also due to various environmental projects we hope to begin in 2009," she said.
The top chemicals released from Marietta area plants also continue to stay the same, Fitch noted.
"We're looking at large volumes in terms of generation of ammonia and magnese compounds," he said.
|
morgan1
|
|
|---|---|
|
12-11-09 8:55 AM
|
I wonder if next years numbers will be totally irrelevant since the EPA listed CO2 as a pollutant? This insanity is ridiculous, there are chemicals that need to be cleaned and neutralized in our enviroment in a productive and economical manner. We all enjoy the benefits of the chemical and industrial industries. Dont forget the health care you mention would grind to a halt without the products provided by the chemical industy.
|
|
mothercanner
|
|
|
12-11-09 8:39 AM
|
Have you ever drove up SR 7 and seen a blue haze, that's coming from the power plant and it's not healthy I don't care what you say. When people are getting sick over and over again from breathing this stuff, something should be done.
|
|
BillMitchell1
|
|
|
12-10-09 10:17 PM
|
The time has come to stop pointing fingers and saying the economy is preventing these plants from upgrading their infrastructure to clean the air. There is only so much reduction in production before you end up going out of business. The technology exists to clean up these plants. Products and power are needed and if costs have to rise to meet govenment standards to clean the air then that becomes the cost of business. Your Federal Government passed these clean air guidelines to help stop global warming - whether clean air has something to it or not - it does make sense for mankind. At some point there will be no more extensions and we will all have to pay the fiddler. We might as well start now because the costs to upgrade will not be going down any time soon. We must move forward - meaningful jobs will be create. There are many investor dollars tied up in these plants and they will soon be speaking out when these plants are faced with upgrading now or shutting down.
|
|
asknot
|
|
|
12-10-09 8:07 PM
|
bulldog/army, common sense tells you that inhaling, ingesting, absorbing chemicals is bad for you. logic then takes you to it causes cancer, and other health issues. look at cancer rates in the past verse now. its not good.
|
|
scandalous
|
|
|
12-10-09 7:47 PM
|
The story is saying "released" but if you read it word for word, it really sounds like it should be "creates/produces" because it is stuff that may be "neutralized or otherwise processed/handled." To say "released" makes it sound like it's going up into the air... a lot of the stuff is processed to non-toxic states or otherwise shipped out/hauled off to be processed. I'm not trying to minimize the report or anything, but choosing the most accurate word is always nice. Words matter.
|
|
armybrat
|
|
|
12-10-09 6:57 PM
|
Bulldog is right.
|
|
bulldog58
|
|
|
12-10-09 4:49 PM
|
Ridge runner you can not live without a job either I personally know several people that lived way out in the country that raised there own meat and had there own personal water supplies and died from cancer.I know several people that has worked in all these plants and lived to be a ripe old age !!!!
|
|
Ridgerunner
|
|
|
12-10-09 3:04 PM
|
A person only has one life to live and I'd rather be breathing clean air than one polluted with toxins and chemicals that have not yet been rated or even identified. I live on a hill and three of my neighbors have cancer and so do I. A fifth neighbor passed away from cancer years ago. The only thing we have in common is that we live on a hill in Washington County, are neighbors and we breathe the same air. Health is first, jobs second. Can't work if you're dead.
|
|
StreetProse
|
|
|
12-10-09 10:49 AM
|
having to choose between your health and your wallet is a sad state of affairs The larger view is a question of how many brain cells we lose per capita due to the pollution. This certainly has an impact well beyond the comfort of material pleasure.
|
|
FFIGHTEROHST
|
|
|
12-10-09 10:32 AM
|
You said it!!!!
|
|
armybrat
|
|
|
12-10-09 9:33 AM
|
It is nice that the air quality is improving, but it is doing so at the cost of jobs in this area. Even plants remaining, have had to cut back on workers to afford the improvements needed to help their plants clean the air. This is a no win situation in this area, do we improve the air or have jobs for the area residents?
|





