Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
19 days ago.
by Ohwiseone
rocker
#1

Daily breaking news and news the liberal media doesn't want you to know, won't report, or just daily news issues.

Americans for many years have had to rely on left leaning biased news reporting from liberal media such as NBC, ABC, and CBS and the New York Times. As most of these outlets struggle to remain on the air and in print, the new media is flourishing and people are hearing both sides of the issues. This forum will provide people with a place to discuss daily news issues of any kind or discuss articles not printed or aired by the liberal news outlets.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

Never thought that being "laid back" would be a bad thing in a rational debate.

Posted 93 days ago.

thegreek

Well were even. You tend to be too laid back online.

Posted 93 days ago.

Kendall78

And you tend to scream online, thus proving my point.

Posted 93 days ago.

thegreek

I AM a TEA Partier... Whats wrong with THAT ?

Posted 93 days ago.

Kendall78

Screaming is not needed in rational debate. If you want screaming, I'd suggest hanging out with Tea Partiers, Code Pink people or even the South Korean Legislature.....they all know how to scream. I doubt you would think they are rational people though.

Besides, it's common courtesy not to talk with all caps on.

Posted 94 days ago.

thegreek

DOES THAT BOTHER YOU ??? I aint screaming. Just making a point. But MORE people SHOULD be SCREAMING !!

Posted 94 days ago.

Kendall78

Greek, do you have to scream. Caps lock off please.

And what you call splitting hairs is what most people call telling the facts. For some reason the irrational Obama haters don't like facts.

Posted 94 days ago.

thegreek

NEW BOOK ON MARKET. HOW TO SPLIT HAIRS. BY KENDALL78. NOT SELLING TOO GOOD AT THE MOMENT !!

Posted 94 days ago.

BeRight

I guess we are making great strides. I hope her cake was good since we paid for part of it.

Posted 95 days ago.

Kendall78

I think there is a problem of whens here.

Who added more people to the food stamp program during their presidency? Currently it would be Bush.

During which presidency has the most people been on food stamps...that would be Obama.

When people are saying more people are on food stamps now than ever before, they are not implying the cumulative aspect of that statement.

Posted 95 days ago.

Kendall78

" The most recent figures from the Department of Agriculture put the number receiving benefits at 46.1 million as of March 2014. That’s down from the nearly 47.8 million who were getting benefits in December 2012.."

(ww w.factcheck.o rg/2014/07/obamas-numbers-july-2014-update)

Posted 95 days ago.

BeRight

same site: now more people have been added to the food-stamp rolls under Obama than under any single previous president. (April 2013).

Posted 95 days ago.

BeRight

“fewer beneficiaries have been added under Obama than were added under George W. Bush”. That seems to be true but shouldn’t the goal be to get people off of gov’t programs not trying to maintain record levels as is happening now?

Posted 95 days ago.

Kendall78

"The number of food-stamp recipients has retreated from the record high of 2012; fewer beneficiaries have been added under Obama than were added under George W. Bush."

(ww w.factcheck.o rg/2014/07/obamas-numbers-july-2014-update)

Posted 95 days ago.

BeRight

I went to factcheck**** and this is what I found: ?The number of low-income persons on food stamps remains just below the record level reached in 2012, with 15 percent of the population still getting benefits. Despite the improved economy, the number of people receiving food-stamp assistance has continued to grow, and now more people have been added to the food-stamp rolls under Obama than under any single previous president. (April 2013). The January 2014 report on that same site says the number of low-income persons on food stamps remains just below the record level reached in 2012, with 15 percent of the population still getting benefits.

Posted 95 days ago.

Kendall78

Actually food-stamp recipients have went down since 2012. Also, "fewer beneficiaries have been added under Obama than were added under George W. Bush." (factcheck.o r g)

Is the levels still high? Yes they are but are they are the worst period? Nope.

Posted 97 days ago.

BeRight

Food stamp nation: Woman in Walmart Check out line today: on sheet cake, 3 lemon meringue pies, one big tub of Ice Cream, paid for by food stamps.

Obama, King of the Food Stamp King Nation.

We all must have gotten injured over the last five years since Social Security disability claims have gone to record highs.

Posted 97 days ago.

thegreek

The federal government is continuing to dole out billions of dollars to people who shouldn't get them. A government watchdog agency said an estimated $106 billion in payments were made in error last year: meaning they were the wrong amount, went to the wrong person or lacked sufficient documentation. These payments include tax refunds, unemployment benefits, Social Security benefits, and Medicare and Medicaid coverage. The improper payments could be even higher since not all agencies reported to the Government Accountability Office. The White House acknowledged that "the loss to the Federal Government is significant," but it pointed to a declining overall error rate: Just 3.5% from 5% in 2009.

Posted 105 days ago.

moderation

Kunec,as I don't know you personally,I only have your shared words to attempt to define your positions on any given topic. And my interpretation,from those words, suggests you support black power.

Posted 149 days ago.

Kunectdots

I interoperate your cynicism, mod but, as I don't know you, I can't tell whether it's intended for me or the masses that don't associate cause with effect.

Posted 150 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or