Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
9 hours ago.
by Stillhere
rocker
#1

Daily breaking news and news the liberal media doesn't want you to know, won't report, or just daily news issues.

Americans for many years have had to rely on left leaning biased news reporting from liberal media such as NBC, ABC, and CBS and the New York Times. As most of these outlets struggle to remain on the air and in print, the new media is flourishing and people are hearing both sides of the issues. This forum will provide people with a place to discuss daily news issues of any kind or discuss articles not printed or aired by the liberal news outlets.

 
 

Member Comments

BeRight

NFL rushing king Adrian Peterson is after another MVP — Most Virile Parent.

The Minnesota Vikings running back had at least five children out of wedlock and could have had as many as seven, according to one of his ex-girlfriends.

The All-Pro Vikings running back was indicted September 12 on felony child abuse charges after admitting to a Texas grand jury that he repeatedly struck one of his 4-year-old sons with a tree branch. Three days later, reports emerged that Peterson was accused of abusing a different 4-year-old son, whose mother claimed Peterson struck the boy in the head last June.

Posted 168 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Brainwashed little critter aint ya ??

Posted 168 days ago.

Ohwiseone

And do you really want to go there greek ? We have been through this and my list of republicans in jail is much longer than yours !

Posted 169 days ago.

Ohwiseone

We don't care if you scream greek , just don't scream repeated right-wing lies!

Posted 169 days ago.

Kendall78

Never thought that being "laid back" would be a bad thing in a rational debate.

Posted 223 days ago.

Kendall78

And you tend to scream online, thus proving my point.

Posted 223 days ago.

Kendall78

Screaming is not needed in rational debate. If you want screaming, I'd suggest hanging out with Tea Partiers, Code Pink people or even the South Korean Legislature.....they all know how to scream. I doubt you would think they are rational people though.

Besides, it's common courtesy not to talk with all caps on.

Posted 224 days ago.

Kendall78

Greek, do you have to scream. Caps lock off please.

And what you call splitting hairs is what most people call telling the facts. For some reason the irrational Obama haters don't like facts.

Posted 224 days ago.

BeRight

I guess we are making great strides. I hope her cake was good since we paid for part of it.

Posted 225 days ago.

Kendall78

I think there is a problem of whens here.

Who added more people to the food stamp program during their presidency? Currently it would be Bush.

During which presidency has the most people been on food stamps...that would be Obama.

When people are saying more people are on food stamps now than ever before, they are not implying the cumulative aspect of that statement.

Posted 225 days ago.

Kendall78

" The most recent figures from the Department of Agriculture put the number receiving benefits at 46.1 million as of March 2014. That’s down from the nearly 47.8 million who were getting benefits in December 2012.."

(ww w.factcheck.o rg/2014/07/obamas-numbers-july-2014-update)

Posted 225 days ago.

BeRight

same site: now more people have been added to the food-stamp rolls under Obama than under any single previous president. (April 2013).

Posted 225 days ago.

BeRight

“fewer beneficiaries have been added under Obama than were added under George W. Bush”. That seems to be true but shouldn’t the goal be to get people off of gov’t programs not trying to maintain record levels as is happening now?

Posted 225 days ago.

Kendall78

"The number of food-stamp recipients has retreated from the record high of 2012; fewer beneficiaries have been added under Obama than were added under George W. Bush."

(ww w.factcheck.o rg/2014/07/obamas-numbers-july-2014-update)

Posted 225 days ago.

BeRight

I went to factcheck**** and this is what I found: ?The number of low-income persons on food stamps remains just below the record level reached in 2012, with 15 percent of the population still getting benefits. Despite the improved economy, the number of people receiving food-stamp assistance has continued to grow, and now more people have been added to the food-stamp rolls under Obama than under any single previous president. (April 2013). The January 2014 report on that same site says the number of low-income persons on food stamps remains just below the record level reached in 2012, with 15 percent of the population still getting benefits.

Posted 225 days ago.

Kendall78

Actually food-stamp recipients have went down since 2012. Also, "fewer beneficiaries have been added under Obama than were added under George W. Bush." (factcheck.o r g)

Is the levels still high? Yes they are but are they are the worst period? Nope.

Posted 227 days ago.

BeRight

Food stamp nation: Woman in Walmart Check out line today: on sheet cake, 3 lemon meringue pies, one big tub of Ice Cream, paid for by food stamps.

Obama, King of the Food Stamp King Nation.

We all must have gotten injured over the last five years since Social Security disability claims have gone to record highs.

Posted 227 days ago.

moderation

Kunec,as I don't know you personally,I only have your shared words to attempt to define your positions on any given topic. And my interpretation,from those words, suggests you support black power.

Posted 279 days ago.

Kunectdots

I interoperate your cynicism, mod but, as I don't know you, I can't tell whether it's intended for me or the masses that don't associate cause with effect.

Posted 280 days ago.

moderation

It would seem the gasoline/lead association legislation was a bit late,kunec.

Posted 280 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or