Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
10 hours ago.
by slinky
rocker
#1

Daily breaking news and news the liberal media doesn't want you to know, won't report, or just daily news issues.

Americans for many years have had to rely on left leaning biased news reporting from liberal media such as NBC, ABC, and CBS and the New York Times. As most of these outlets struggle to remain on the air and in print, the new media is flourishing and people are hearing both sides of the issues. This forum will provide people with a place to discuss daily news issues of any kind or discuss articles not printed or aired by the liberal news outlets.

 
 

Member Comments

Shopsteward

Absolem there are some that actually believe that i cannot happen here. Our founders knew better

Posted 149 days ago.

Yup , I remember ! The troll hasnt a clue about firearms !

Posted 149 days ago.

No dum-dum , only the military should have military assault weapons !

Posted 149 days ago.

Shopsteward

! These firearms were designed to kill and maim and should only be used by the military !

All guns can kill , that should go without saying

So i guess only the military should have guns by your logic, or lack thereof

Posted 149 days ago.

I remember now , the troll didnt know about air gaps in bullets, or unbalancing bullets to make them yaw or rifling at different rates to make them more accurate !

Posted 149 days ago.

Yeah well I seem to remember that the tiredbrain expert on gun bullsh^t really doesnt know very much ! We sell guns to other countries MILITARY ! All guns can kill , that should go without saying , some are way more efficiant than others !The technology has moved ahead and things we thought were only in the movies are now reality !

Posted 149 days ago.

Shopsteward

Perhaps Absolem they give them those guns not designed to kill.

Posted 149 days ago.

absolem

OWO...if we consider what you say it true. why in the world does our government supply military-grade weaponry to the "citizens" of other nations who wish to use them against their own elected government. perhaps government oppression and abuse only occurs over-seas. we do not track nor ask them to be returned when their use is over. nah...your tax-payer weapons of mass destruction continue their assault...will they eventually find their way back home? who knows.

Posted 149 days ago.

And the point still is , no one needs a military assault weapon ! These firearms were designed to kill and maim and should only be used by the military !

Posted 150 days ago.

Shopsteward

No Harry i made myself quite clear in my original statement

Posted 150 days ago.

harryanderson

Coaluser, I agree to a degree. Guns in the hands of normal citizens aren't the point. Guns in the hands of murderers are the point.

Right?

Posted 150 days ago.

" The Govt wants to have a monopoly on guns." OMG , and has that happened in recent history ?

Posted 150 days ago.

Just go back through these threads and look at what you've gotten while trying to have your "rational discourse". Nothing but snide over bearing bullsh^t and pure right-wing propaganda ! Oh and lets not forget that this is a "person" who makes up sh^t to try and one up anybody who gets the edge on it !

Posted 150 days ago.

Coaluser

Gun related deaths are not even in the top twenty cuases of death in the US. If you remove suicide, lawfull homicide and gang related killings by guns, gun related eaths don't even crack the top 100. You have a better chance of dying by influenza or acquiring an endocrine disorder, OR acquiring HIV, than being killed in a criminal homicide. Guns are not the issue folks. The Govt wants to have a monopoly on guns. Plus, it's NONE of Gov's business who has guns. Another stupid TRUMPED up issue by the left for controlling purposes.

Posted 150 days ago.

Harry , you cant have a "rational discourse". with the likes of the tiredbrain troll !

Posted 150 days ago.

harryanderson

Shopsteward,

You're right. I shouldn't have written that, and I apologize for implying you acted cowardly.

Let's just say you prefer not to make yourself clear.

Posted 150 days ago.

harryanderson

Coaluser,

Suitcase nukes are relevant. So are knives and swords and hammers. Here's why:

As far as I know, nobody wants to ban ballpein hammers and nobody wants to allow suitcase nukes. We all want to draw a line somewhere.

I've not yet decided where that line should be, so I was seeking information from others on here who might have given it a lot of thought.

Posted 150 days ago.

Shopsteward

"even though you stuck your tail between your legs and scampered from my invitation to clarify your statement."

And this is of course conducive to"rational discourse".

Posted 150 days ago.

Shopsteward

Thanks I will "restassured".

Posted 150 days ago.

harryanderson

Or being clever.

Posted 150 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or