Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
13 hours ago.
by BeRight
rocker
#1

Daily breaking news and news the liberal media doesn't want you to know, won't report, or just daily news issues.

Americans for many years have had to rely on left leaning biased news reporting from liberal media such as NBC, ABC, and CBS and the New York Times. As most of these outlets struggle to remain on the air and in print, the new media is flourishing and people are hearing both sides of the issues. This forum will provide people with a place to discuss daily news issues of any kind or discuss articles not printed or aired by the liberal news outlets.

 
 

Member Comments

BeRight

Try this one on:

Something could be missing from your next electric bill: a fee that electric customers have been paying for 31 years to fund a federal nuclear waste site that doesn't exist.

The Energy Department will stop charging the fee by court order on Friday. The amount is only a small percentage of most customers' bills, but it adds up to $750 million a year. The fund now holds $37 billion.

Posted 125 days ago.

Kendall78

Why must they?

Posted 126 days ago.

Tiredofit

maybe you don't think the Dems benefit from fraud but THEY must.

Posted 126 days ago.

Kendall78

I never said that the Dems never benefit from it, perhaps they did. But perhaps the Republicans did as well. We simply do not know and it goes back to my premise that there is no evidence of any fraud that got a Democrat elected.

Regarless of political bias, fraud and any prejudice against voters should be dealt with. We did it in the South when idiots tried to create tests to vote in elections, so there is no reason we shouldn't stop fraud now.

Posted 126 days ago.

Tiredofit

Nah Kendall, no Dems were the beneficiary of Illegal votes LOL sure

Posted 126 days ago.

Tiredofit

To date, 46 states have prosecuted or convicted cases of voter fraud. • More than 24 million voter registrations are invalid, yet remain on the rolls nation-wide. • There are over 1.8 million dead voters still eligible on the rolls across the country. • More than 2.75 million Americans are registered to vote in more than one state. • True The Vote recently found 99 cases of potential felony interstate voter fraud. • Maryland affiliates of True The Vote uncovered cases of people registering and voting after their respective deaths. • This year, True The Vote uncovered more than 348,000 dead people on the rolls in 27 states. ? California: 49,000 ? Florida: 30,000 ? Texas: 28,500 ? Michigan: 25,000 ? Illinois: 24,000

Posted 126 days ago.

Kendall78

"the Senate would not vote on a guilty verdict anyway. At least not at present."

I agree, the Senate wouldn't proceed. I don't even think a Republican Senate would proceed.

Posted 126 days ago.

Kendall78

"Likewise the dems are trying to allow fraud that puts them in power or encourage a constituancy that votes only for them."

At least in regards to Federal elections (President, Congress..etc), there is no evidence of any fraud that got a Democrat elected.

Posted 126 days ago.

Tiredofit

Lets be honest. No politician takes a side that does not further his chances of reelection, cynical yes, truthful indeed. Now the republicans are either trying to correct voter fraud which they believe is against them and/or trying to suppress a group that is also likely to vote against them. Likewise the dems are trying to allow fraud that puts them in power or encourage a constituancy that votes only for them.

Posted 126 days ago.

RANDOM21

When I last renewed my DL, I waited the additional two weeks and got the US approved version. Don't fly too much anymore, but wanted to be able to without additional hassle. As far as impeachable it may be a misdemeanor charge and that is also on the list. There only has to be witnesses willing to testify to bring the charge. No matter, the Senate would not vote on a guilty verdict anyway. At least not at present.

Posted 126 days ago.

Kendall78

On the topic of a National ID, there should be no problem in having this. My only desire is that it is considered something that must be excepted anywhere in the US as a valid ID. Meaning, if you are renewing your driver's license...the National ID would count as a form of recognizable ID.

Posted 126 days ago.

Kendall78

"Obama presides over the cover up of the murder of four Americans"

Obama and his administration has never denied that the four men were killed or that they were killed by Muslims. So there is no cover up in that regard.

The only issue is whether they purposely sent bad info out on the specific why those men died. Is that an impeachable offense? Doubtful because it's not treason, bribery or a high crime as described by the Constitution.

Posted 126 days ago.

Tiredofit

Let's be honest about this, why is it such a big deal to show ID? A person is required to register as a voter no? Is that an unreasonable burden? Who in this country does not have some form of identification?

Posted 126 days ago.

Tiredofit

Care to 'splain that one?

Posted 126 days ago.

Tiredofit

That is directly taken from the whitehouse website regarding tour information if you don't believe me.

Posted 126 days ago.

Tiredofit

All guests 18 years of age or older will be required to present a valid, government-issued photo identification (detailed below). All foreign nationals must present their passport. All other forms of foreign identification will not be accepted. .. .....hmm to visit the whitehouse you are required to show a govt I'd, but to say who lives there you don't need one? Is the whitehouse trying to keep minorities out of the whitehouse tour??????..racists!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted 126 days ago.

moderation

I guess you are conceding that the fraudulent voting issue doesn't really have supportive evidence? The fraud, is saying that there is significant voter fraud, when in fact, there is not.And,voting is not something that should be restricted by a budget on a diet.Ample funding for polling locations and staffing should come before tax cuts.

Posted 126 days ago.

BeRight

I think the early voting hours should be every day, but not the 8-5 BS. If we are trying to keep cost down for election boards I think the hours should be maybe 12-8 everyday for early voting or 5am to 1:00 pm in order to allow people to vote without taking off work. People can also vote absentee any time by mail.

I just think you need to identify yourself.

Posted 127 days ago.

moderation

No,beright. What drives this issue is the inference of a voter fraud problem.Closing,reducing polling locations serves what purpose? Limiting or lowering voting hours from established norms serves ' whose ' purposes? What is the rush to fix a problem that doesn't exist?

Posted 127 days ago.

BeRight

Nice try. The Democrats main argument is not as you describe it. Their argument has always been that it is an unreasonable burden on some people to come up with an ID. Witness there photo opps of people who just can’t manage to get ID and who “voted all their life” and now can’t vote because they can’t get an ID. You have to identify yourself at many other daily interactions, including entering the Marietta YMCA. Claiming that showing an ID to vote is an undue burden is just lame. If I were a Democrat I was just pass a bill that promotes a national ID program and defuse the issue.

Posted 128 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or