Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
306 days ago.
by Munster
Lilyofthevalley
#1

Racism and the 2012 election

Explain how one group can be racist for voting around 60% against a man of a different racial background but another group that votes 90% against a person of a different racial background isn't racist?

 
 

Member Comments

thegreek

The democrats are ruling with a false majority when people have been caught voting umpteen times and districts have NO REGISTERED VOTES FOR ROMNEY.. Hel l, Kadaffi couldn't even keep 1 person from voting for the opposition. !! How did the dems do it??? By cheating on counting the votes and Munster calls the repubs liars. If we were, we would have power and tie your stupid a s$ up pronto...!!!

Posted 312 days ago.

BeRight

BBB

Posted 312 days ago.

thegreek

Amen kunect and rocker. Well said.

Posted 312 days ago.

Kunectdots

Because, "the majority" (that bother to vote) are becoming politically dumbed down for "free" trinkets from Santa Obama at the expense of the people that are too busy working and raising RESPONSIBLE families to pay attention to the fact that their rights are being threatened.

Posted 312 days ago.

munster says "they are racists and cant stand the thought of a black president !"

Your wrong munster. People just can't stand the thought of a anti-Constitution socialist with very little experience who has been a fraud from the first day he campaigned. He was never fully vetted and is unqualified and unfit to serve even as dog catcher.

Posted 312 days ago.

BeRight

BBB

Posted 312 days ago.

BeRight

available in 83.6 million households : but how many watch it. By its ratings, I would say you and Fred.

Posted 382 days ago.

scrappile

So the incumbent had a media advantage, wonder if that works for state reps., state senators, federal reps., and senators, doo-dah-doo,

Posted 382 days ago.

BeRight

We got this fancy thing called the “internet” at my house. And if you a thing called a “search” and put in “MSNBC 85% content “” you get things people call “sources”. Something called “Pew” notes that MSNBC was ranked last when it came to providing unbiased and fact-based news. 85% was talking BS.

During the 2012 presidential campaign season, MSNBC allocated 57 percent of its coverage to the president’s campaign. So 85% of that was also BS.

So they spent more tim covering the pres than the challenger. Is that Racist?

Posted 382 days ago.

BeRight

Latest report on MSNBC is ths 85% of their content is talking head nonsensem 15% hard news.

Posted 383 days ago.

thegreek

I get it from a reliable news source or publication. I don't just*****it out of my brain like you do.

Posted 384 days ago.

thegreek

I neever implied I was an expert at anything!! If I am not sure of something I KEEP MY MOUTH SHUT and dont go spewing half truths like you do.

Posted 385 days ago.

thegreek

People act like they are experts at everything and dont know squat.

Posted 385 days ago.

thegreek

Munster you are like debating a groundhog.

Posted 385 days ago.

luvthesouth

Munster, i do not desire to entertain you nor waste anymore time with you on this subject. i have yet to see any regular contributor to these forums post anything remotely indicating that the presidents race has anything to do with their/our displeasure. we (like-minded posters) have consistently indicated that many/some/all of his policies are the problem. yet you refuse to accept that reason. if "we" have, please expend your time and energy searching for it and posting it when you find it. until then... your blanket claim will remain false and offensive to myself and the otherlike-minded posters. i will state that out of the millions of americans that voted in the last and previous election,it is probable that there had to be "some" that voted against obama based on his race. but those "some" were not limited to just republicans. that observation is just as probable.

Posted 386 days ago.

luvthesouth

friend munster, i appreciate truth. there is so very little actually being shared in this day and time. we must be careful of "feelings". that may be why you are so refreshing. the lack of truth and your assumption of others has affected your ability to interact with those that think differently than you. since i have actually lived (same space and house) with others different in skin color and culture than myself, it is hard for me to overlook your accusations of racism when it comes to one's opinions of the president. while you have the right to feel about him as you do, you do not have the right to throw unfounded accusations of racism at others as you do. that is pretty low even for your standards. your head-bobbing friends may not disagree with you...but i do and in my world that is all that matters. that is the truth. enjoy your day.

Posted 386 days ago.

luvthesouth

moderation...i think that would be the gold tee's for the grey hairs! actually very few courses have the black tee boxes. either way a bad day on the course beats the heck out of a good day at the office! enjoy your day!

Posted 386 days ago.

moderation

lts- no grey tee ? Uhhh ohhh.

Posted 386 days ago.

luvthesouth

moderation, fair enough, saves me time to focus on other more pressing issues...like should i play from the white or black tee's today! maybe i should first consult with munster, since he has appointed himself the official color czar! ha

Posted 386 days ago.

moderation

lts- that's ok,... um,I, uh...., I'm moving on to some other controversy. Ha (>;

Posted 387 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or