| Latest Post: Started By: Rank: Category BenghaziNothing seems to add up in this Ambassador Stevens murder. Orders to stand down. Poor security on 911. Could Stevens have been sacrified as an eye for an eye for taking out Bin Laden with the Muslim radicals? What do you think? Member CommentsthegreekI dont recall anyone proclaiming their lifes goal in kindergarten as - I wanna grow to be a Whistleblower, and made to feel like a jerk and a traitor because I did what my parents taught me as being moral. Telling the truth !! Posted 6 days ago. thegreekA threat from the head man in charge will make people change their perceptions, Munny. Posted 6 days ago. MunsterYeah we are beginning to hear about a "source" not giving accurate info IE :lying , gee I wonder which side of the aisle they were on ? Posted 6 days ago. moderationYup, lts, it was the clandestine agenda of the cia that prompted me to say, in the to-begin-with, that barry would not be inclined to be as candid as all those shrill voices demanded. I did not go back to refresh my memory, but I believe that was what I conveyed. And more shall be revealed..... Posted 6 days ago. luvthesouthmoderation...a correction to my last post....it should be kevin instead of steve. mental slip. Posted 6 days ago. luvthesouthmoderation, after reading your suggested article, it seems to me that steve quoted another "news source" that referenced an unnamed official lending little to the credibility. i did note that should the source be true, stevens would have turned down military security and not the requested security from the state department which he requested at least four times. it is possible that he anticipated state department security and declined the military security in anticipation of such. another consideration is the involvement of the CIA which adds a whole other variable to the equation. would you not agree? unfortunately we can't interview the deceased for the "truth". Posted 6 days ago. luvthesouthupon review of the past post, it is clear that i was off on the exact number and ratio of personel. Posted 6 days ago. luvthesouthdate of the assault and of the CIA's authoritative role at the consulate. The operatives evacuated mission personnel and took control of an unarmed U.S. military drone to map possible escape routes, the officials said. The MQ-1 Predator drone, used by the CIA for reconnaissance, began providing video surveillance. In the midst of the assault, the operatives also dispatched an emergency reinforcement team from Tripoli, the capital, and chartered aircraft that ultimately carried surviving U.S. personnel to safety, the officials said. Of the more than 30 U.S. officials evacuated from Benghazi, only seven worked for the State Department, officials briefed on the intelligence told The Wall Street Journal. Nearly all the rest worked for the CIA, under diplomatic cover, which was a principal purpose of the consulate, the Journal said. Posted 6 days ago. luvthesouthgood morning moderation...at least for me! the long game is fine it is the second shot in most cases that comes close to ruining the game. you sound like you are doing well and that is a good thing. i was not aware of any refusal of extra security. there seems to be an abundance of evidence to the contrary. however the following is the referenced post to you from 99 days ago. "moderation: The CIA was the real commanding agency at the attacked U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, not the State Department, senior U.S. intelligence officials said. The intelligence officials said that within 25 minutes of being alerted to the attack in a desperate phone call, the CIA rushed a half-dozen security operatives to the mission from a secret base about a mile away.The operatives, who arrived at the mission about 25 minutes after that, joined State Department security agents in a futile search through heavy smoke and enemy fire for Stevens, the officials said in the most thorough account to da Posted 6 days ago. MunsterWell geek you ding-dongs don't like the truth !And when your told the truth you refuse to believe it ! And we are where we are right now because your bunch of polititions have decided to have a strategy of obstruction ! In the past after an election the two side would clear the air and get to work for their bosses (us ) ! Your side has decided that screw the American public , they want their way NOW !!!!And they don't care what this does to the majority of americans , they will protect their wealthy benefactors ! Posted 6 days ago. MunsterIs this sh*t going to be our future ? A new scandal every week , another filibuster to make sure nothing gets done ? Whose going to step up and say this isn't right and I'm going to do what I was sent here for ! As long as these idiots keep following Grover Norquist's plan America will be in trouble ! Posted 6 days ago. R1KRA8“Last week's testimony under oath about events in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 makes painfully clear that what the Obama administration told the American people about those events were lies out of whole cloth.”
“The State Department's own foreign service officer Gregory Hicks was in Libya during the attack, so he knew the truth. When threats were not enough to silence him, it was then necessary to try to discredit him.”
Lies About Libya
By Thomas Sowell Posted 6 days ago. MunsterIs this sh*t going to be our future ? A new scandal every week , another filibuster to make sure nothing gets done ? Whose going to step up and say this isn't right and I'm going to do what I was sent here for ! As long as these idiots keep following Grover Norquist's plan America will be in trouble ! Posted 6 days ago. R1KRA8The Difference Between Benghazi And Oakland By Cory Franklin Posted 6 days ago. MunsterWell geek what you have to worry about is if this strategy of absolute obstruction works for your unethical party , just what do you think will happen if your goosestepping Nazi's ever get back in ?? Posted 6 days ago. R1KRA8Managing the Benghazi crisis is a tricky business By Tara McKelvey (BBC) Posted 6 days ago. moderationmasked man... whatchu say and wuz happening? There is documentation that the ambassador refused additional security. It was exhibited on a tv news broadcast. Did you see it or are you aware of it? How's your long game, by the way ? Take care Posted 6 days ago. Post a Comment |