Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
1 day ago.
by Munster
oneill
#1

Are "gun-rights" advocates who say they "need" combat-style weaponry to "protect the nation from dictatorship" dangerous anarchists who are endangering the REAL Second-Amendment rights of law-abiding Americans with their paranoid, anti-government rants?

None of the recent suggested actions by the President or the Biden task force concerning universal background checks or the regulation of military-style weapons and high-capacity magazines poses a serious threat to the Second Amemdment rights of law-abiding Americans ... Yet, NRA honcho Wayne LaPierre, and the usual gaggle of hotheads that support him, say that Americans need to be "ready if necessary" to use these weapons to fight against "dictatorship". What "dictatorship"? This isn't Syria or Nazi Germany. The only actions relating to guns that President Obama took during his first term was to allow guns to be taken on board AMTRAK trains and brought into national parks ... Do the paranoid and delusional beliefs of some (though not all) gun-advocates disqualify them from being mentally sound enough to purchase or own guns? The 2008 "Heller v District of Columbia" ruling says that the government DOES have a right to prohibit mentally-defective

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

What a tool you are Munster, did you even read what I posted. Ya know WIKI is written by any idiot like you

Posted 61 days ago.

Democracy or Ochlocracy?

Posted 61 days ago.

Tiredofit

Education is something you should have invested in MORON MUNSTER

Posted 61 days ago.

Tiredofit

A Republic

A Republic, on the other hand, has a very different purpose and an entirely different form, or system, of government. Its purpose is to control The Majority strictly, as well as all others among the people, primarily to protect The Individual’s God-given, unalienable rights and therefore for the protection of the rights of The Minority, of all minorities, and the liberties of people in general. The definition of a Republic is: a constitutionally limited government of the representative type, created by a written Constitution--adopted by the people and changeable (from its original meaning) by them only by its amendment--with its powers divided between three separate Branches: Executive, Legislative and Judicial. Here the term "the people" means, of course, the electorate.

Posted 61 days ago.

Tiredofit

The chief characteristic and distinguishing feature of a Democracy is: Rule by Omnipotent Majority. In a Democracy, The Individual, and any group of Individuals composing any Minority, have no protection against the unlimited power of The Majority. It is a case of Majority-over-Man.

Posted 61 days ago.

Tiredofit

re·pub·lic [ri-puhb-lik] Show IPA

noun 1. a state in which the supreme power rests in the body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by them.

Posted 61 days ago.

Hey munster and oneill, when is your new socialist demokratic party going to bring up this bombing and make a new law in the Congress to prevent these bombings in the future?

They should enact criminal background checks for potential bombers, mental checks, registration of all bombers, and lets not forget the background checks of private bomb buyers at bomb shows.

And oneill we are a Republic. Didn't we go through this once lol. Are you and munster brothers? What a couple of yayhoos you two are! haha!

Posted 61 days ago.

Tiredofit

Yea Munster do show me how we have a democracy, moron. And Fred keep dreaming of your socialist utopia, maybe someday.

Posted 61 days ago.

moderation

that is true stick, but it was 'all' guns, and it affected whom?

Posted 61 days ago.

Kunectdots

"Is the liberal anti-gun push backfiring?" By Meredith Jessup | The Blaze – 3 hrs ago.

h ttp://news.yahoo.c om/liberal-anti-gun-push-backfiring-163040026.html

AGAIN; Please check out the "Comments" section following the article.

Posted 61 days ago.

Texas Senate votes to offer advanced handgun training for school employees

By Terrence Stutz

(dallasnews)

Posted 61 days ago.

BeRight

Mandatory background checks are a feel good thing and would not have prevented Newtown. According to the president, that what yesterday’s vote was about, preventing another Newtown. Yesterday’s vote was about gun control. When you have increased mandatory background checks, you have bigger lists of Americans on Gov’t lists. We can’t document illegals but we want to document gun owners. I have a better idea, let’s make a list of people most likely to use guns to kill other people. Only Newtown families who agreed with Obama got a free ride on AF1. Those who did not got to stay home.

Posted 61 days ago.

When Tired & the tea party wingnuts yap about America being a "republic", they are thinking of "banana republics" like Guatemala, Venezuela, OR Texas!

Posted 61 days ago.

even more inclusive gun-legislation can be put forth and passed. Perhaps gun-control advocates needed this small setback to make them angry enough to use ballots against bullets and kick the "stupids" out of both Congress and the Ohio Statehouse in 2014! ... The crazy gun-fetishists can gloat while they can! There WILL be reform, even if it has to happen state-by-state! The "Connecticut Effect" is still in effect!

Posted 61 days ago.

Tired and the rest wouldn't know the meaning of "democracy" if it fell on their heads ... The Senate vote was 54-46 IN FAVOR of universal-background checks, but the gun-lobby stooges (in both parties) stacked-the-deck by using the unConstitutional filibuster gimmick that requires 60 votes to get anything done. This might be called the "totalitrianism of the minority" (which is partly Harry Reid's fault for not eliminating it when he had a chance in February). These tactics - including Gerrymandering districts and restricting voter eligibility - only indicate that rightwing fanatics like Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul, Jim Inhofe, Ted Cruze, ad. nauseum care NOTHING for either democracy or The Constitution (James Madison wrote that simple majority-rule should be the order in Congress) ... Since the Manchin/Toomey Bill was flawed anyway (there were prohibitions against universal gun-registration and other items that had no teeth), it's back-to-the-drawing board where ev

Posted 61 days ago.

Tiredofit

Munster doesn't like democracy when it goes against him. Even though its really a REPUBLIC, he still thinks we live in a democracy.

Posted 61 days ago.

Kunectdots

One thing that wasn't "shot"...The 2nd Amendment.

Posted 61 days ago.

Kunectdots

"Mark Kelly on Gun Vote: 'Gabby Is Angry Today'" By Arlette Saenz | ABC OTUS News – 21 mins ago.

h ttp://news.yahoo.c om/mark-kelly-gun-vote-gabby-angry-today-160735664--abc-news-politics.html

Be sure to read the reactions posted in the "Comments" area following that article.

Posted 61 days ago.

Tiredofit

Imigration reform may likely go the same way.

Posted 61 days ago.

Tiredofit

A lesson clearly displayed by FORMER congressman Mollohan who voted against the will of the people, and with Obama.

Posted 61 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or