| Latest Post: Started By: Rank: Category Are "gun-rights" advocates who say they "need" combat-style weaponry to "protect the nation from dictatorship" dangerous anarchists who are endangering the REAL Second-Amendment rights of law-abiding Americans with their paranoid, anti-government rants?None of the recent suggested actions by the President or the Biden task force concerning universal background checks or the regulation of military-style weapons and high-capacity magazines poses a serious threat to the Second Amemdment rights of law-abiding Americans ... Yet, NRA honcho Wayne LaPierre, and the usual gaggle of hotheads that support him, say that Americans need to be "ready if necessary" to use these weapons to fight against "dictatorship". What "dictatorship"? This isn't Syria or Nazi Germany. The only actions relating to guns that President Obama took during his first term was to allow guns to be taken on board AMTRAK trains and brought into national parks ... Do the paranoid and delusional beliefs of some (though not all) gun-advocates disqualify them from being mentally sound enough to purchase or own guns? The 2008 "Heller v District of Columbia" ruling says that the government DOES have a right to prohibit mentally-defective Member CommentsR1KRA8Sandy Hook shooting - AR-15 rifle was left in the car! by HealthRanger Posted 66 days ago. Kunectdotsand HERE IT IS!!! h ttp://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.c om/2013/01/08/where-is-sandy-hook-schools-surveilliance-video/ Posted 67 days ago. R1KRA8US Senate's 'baby-step forward' on gun control (Deutsche Welle) Posted 67 days ago. Kunectdotsstick - Ignoring the squealing of our misguided band of 2nd Amendment decimators briefly, I hope you will join me in agreement with the logical pursuit of relevance to the public interest in release of the video (it has been claimed exists) of Lanza outside Sandy Hook Elementary. We MAY, at least, be able to see what the man had in his hands. Where is Sandy Hook school’s surveillance video? Tuesday, January 8, 2013 13:41 h ttp://beforeitsnews.c om/opinion-conservative/2013/01/where-is-sandy-hook-schools-surveillance-video-2555220.html Posted 67 days ago. R1KRA8Do you seriously expect moderation (a union affiliate of 30+ years) to open the floor with an HONEST debate?
You see moderation, you continue to deny the origin of the “cut & paste” comments you have posted on these threads. How many ways can you spell moderation? Posted 67 days ago. R1KRA8moderation = hypocrite
Posted 24 days ago. Tiredofit said- “Muster has stooped to copying my lines how sad”
Munster said- “Your lines, copyrighted???”
moderation said- " “ [ nothing ] ” " Posted 67 days ago. R1KRA8Gun Measures Put Moderate Senate Dems in Bind By Ken Thomas Posted 67 days ago. R1KRA8The village “Munster” cannot be swayed from his mindless repetitious tripe. We all have to endure the non-stop crap fest that is Munster. Logic and reason will not deter the freeloading Democrat zombie from doing his Union Fat Cat’s bidding. For the "village idiots" like Munster, who cannot accept the facts that prove them wrong, it is a sad state of affairs that even after being debunked, Munster keeps up this constant barrage of ignorant ‘cut & paste’ stupidity. Munster and others like him are all that is wrong with these forums. Posted 67 days ago. moderationYou see riki, you continue to LIE about the origin of the author of the comments posted on these threads. I am responsible for what I share, but not what you fabricate to falsely represent my posting. How many ways can you spell rikrab? Posted 67 days ago. R1KRA8Gun Bill Puts Moderate Senate Democrats Seeking Reelection In Bind By Ken Thomas (Associated Press) Posted 67 days ago. R1KRA8Do you seriously expect moderation (a union affiliate of 30+ years) to open the floor with an HONEST debate? Posted 67 days ago. R1KRA8moderation, what do YOU think you add here by copying others posts??? . . . Tiredofit said - “Ok Moderation, open the floor with an honest debate, I wait.” . . . Do you seriously expect a union affiliate of 30+ years to do that? . . . moderation said- "Well, could ya ?" Munster said- "NO !" . . . Still waiting . . . Posted 67 days ago. moderationR1KRA8 said- "What oneill and Munster fail to comprehend is that the topic of gun-related-violence in America should NOT be a parlor game of name-calling and insults",after he said "A hypocritical Chamber (moderation) Pot meets kettle". All after I said "tiredofit sez- "R1KRAB what do you think you add here by copying others posts??? Could you at least comment in your own words"?" "Well,could ya "? Posted 67 days ago. R1KRA8what is a "demigod"? . . . Definition of demigod 1: a mythological being with more power than a mortal but less than a god 2 : a person so outstanding as to seem to approach the divine (merriam-webster) Posted 67 days ago. stickhaulerFunny, the prosecutor said he had 3 magazines, it's the claim of the anti-gun crowd dancing in these children's blood who NOW say he had 8. I'm thinking perhaps more truth comes from the authorities who had access to the evidence itself than the claims of a group seeking to ban firearms. You speak of the success anti-gun legislation has achieved with the vote on Thursday. You do realize that was only a vote to bring the bill, yet to be defined, to the floor for debate? And even some Senators who voted to allow it to come to the floor are sure votes, because they have yet to see exactly what the measure says. Oh, and for it to go to Obama's desk, such a piece of legislation needs to be approved by the House as well. Posted 67 days ago. R1KRA8New state laws illustrate America's stark divide on gun control By Andy Sullivan (Reuters) Posted 67 days ago. R1KRA8What oneill and Munster fail to comprehend is that the topic of gun-related-violence in America should NOT be a parlor game of name-calling and insults! Posted 67 days ago. R1KRA8The "gig" is up! I could not care less about childish name-calling and insults of the moron you call "1ill"! If YOU paid him less attention, he might go play elsewhere! Posted 68 days ago. KunectdotsYeah, oneill - I'm pretty suspicious of the opinions of ANY man that would push for alterations of 1 tenth of The Bill of Rights, "on a state-by-state basis". It might suggest him having some desire to twist portions of the remaining 90% of THAT document also. These "state-by-state" usurpations of our rights will certainly give the SCOTUS some dilemmas to entertain in the coming years. But EVEN YOU, as a has-been teacher of history, SHOULD know that. Posted 68 days ago. Post a Comment |