Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
6 hours ago.
by Kunectdots
oneill
#1

Are "gun-rights" advocates who say they "need" combat-style weaponry to "protect the nation from dictatorship" dangerous anarchists who are endangering the REAL Second-Amendment rights of law-abiding Americans with their paranoid, anti-government rants?

None of the recent suggested actions by the President or the Biden task force concerning universal background checks or the regulation of military-style weapons and high-capacity magazines poses a serious threat to the Second Amemdment rights of law-abiding Americans ... Yet, NRA honcho Wayne LaPierre, and the usual gaggle of hotheads that support him, say that Americans need to be "ready if necessary" to use these weapons to fight against "dictatorship". What "dictatorship"? This isn't Syria or Nazi Germany. The only actions relating to guns that President Obama took during his first term was to allow guns to be taken on board AMTRAK trains and brought into national parks ... Do the paranoid and delusional beliefs of some (though not all) gun-advocates disqualify them from being mentally sound enough to purchase or own guns? The 2008 "Heller v District of Columbia" ruling says that the government DOES have a right to prohibit mentally-defective

 
 

Member Comments

Munster

NO !

Posted 38 days ago.

moderation

Tiredofit sez- "R1KRAB what do you think you add here by copying others posts??? Could you at least comment in your own words"?

Posted 1 day ago. Well,could ya ?

Posted 38 days ago.

Munster

And despite all your attempts to deny and deflect the real truth is still NO CIVILIAN NEEDS A MILITARY ASSAULT WEAPON ! You want one, well join the military they'll give you one !

Posted 38 days ago.

EXCLUSIVE: ACLU says Reid’s gun legislation could threaten privacy rights, civil liberties

by Vince Coglianese

Posted 38 days ago.

Munster

And despite all your attempts to deny and deflect the real truth is still NO CIVILIAN NEEDS A MILITARY ASSAULT WEAPON ! You want one, well join the military they'll give you one !

Posted 38 days ago.

Munster

I see someone else just got done listening to The crying beckster and now feels the need to pollute these forums with right-wing crappola !

Posted 38 days ago.

The terrifying and distressing thing is the childish (?adult?) poster who is a retired/disabled USW ‘dues exempt’ Union Thug owns firearms and other sharp objects.

“I have weapons and the will and knowledge to use them !” ~ Munster

“Be very careful of what you want !” ~ Munster

“You just might get it !” ~ Munster

Posted 38 days ago.

Munster

Fred isn't it funny that when one doesn't agree with the goosesteppers here' you are immediately labeled a" bully" or as "vile and hateful" or a "socialist " ! And if you can listen long enough , these are the terms that you hear from the likes of El Lardass and the Beckster etc ! Meanwhile you come to understand thet if there were ever an end to the right-wing crap factories most here couldn't even spell their name !

Posted 38 days ago.

Munster

And still there is no reason for a civilian to own a assault weapon ! Look , you guys can waller all over the place trying to deflect and deceive from the point but you really haven't a leg to stand on ! If our government restricts assault weapons like has been done in the past , then that will be the LAW !! Accept that and move on , I don't think you will even notice the change !

Posted 38 days ago.

Munster

Rikra8, really makes people realize what quality of people support gun control heh?~~~Greek ~~ That pretty well sums it up ! Low functioning right-wing propaganda braiwashed , weak minded dolts !

Posted 38 days ago.

Tiredofit

I see Fred is selling the line "if you don't have anything to hide you won't mind having you rights violated". This is the real danger in the progressive big Govt agenda. They are Soooo willing to hand over liberty for some perception of a false security. Of course that means my liberty as well. Government cannot protect you nor will they.

Posted 38 days ago.

Tiredofit

Fred, be as unkind as you like, you are completely powerless over me or anyone else that posts here. Your masturbatory rants only amuse thinking people and show you for the small bitter socialist that you are. If they have any effect at all, its to drive people away from your position as siding with someone so vile and hateful dorsnt set well with most people. Have a nice day.

Posted 38 days ago.

stickhauler

Freddie, Lanza had THREE 30 round magazines. He fired approximately 150 rounds. So, he did reload!

The proposed legislation they plan to debate in the Senate doesn't do anything that would have stopped Lanza. It will only infringe on law abiding gun owners, the ONLY gun owners who will comply with it if passed.

Where is the legislation that deals with mentally ill people who have shown they are a danger to society? Or is that not politically correct?

Posted 38 days ago.

Kunectdots

You return those that are under command of the civilian leadership to only having flintlocks or figure a way for our nation to SAFELY survive in today's world WITHOUT a standing army, then will talk about the further disarmament of the American public.

Posted 38 days ago.

Kunectdots

Munster - To Your Question Posed to Me- I ANSWER; The founding fathers were unconcerned with plinking or hunting when they crafted the 2nd Amendment. Many of them, although AGAINST THE CONCEPT of standing armies still insisted that the power of the people to rebel against usurpations of their rights, by FUTURE authoritarian government, be left in place. Well, their posterity lost the status of NOT HAVING a standing army that was originally hardly better equipped than the US civilians (Fred Oneill's Brown Bess). Killing technologies advanced and the American people were keeping astride with the possible future tyrants until the 1930's, when Mid-Western bank robbers caused the private ownership of TRUE assault weapons to become illegal for public possession.

Now, you and your Ilk want to make rifles that LOOK LIKE assault weapons illegal. I'm still siding with the founding fathers on this one.

Posted 38 days ago.

thegreek

Rikra8, really makes people realize what quality of people support gun control heh? Speak out against me and I/we will strike you down !!! They can all kiss my grits!!!

Posted 39 days ago.

“keep up with the silly distractions on this topic, and see how "unkind" I can get . . .” ~ Mr. Nepotism . . . returns with his customary ‘67ish year-old’ use of name-calling, insults, and threats. Watch your postings as he makes all EXCEPT the liberal ones disappear.

Posted 39 days ago.

“keep up with the silly distractions on this topic, and see how "unkind" I can get . . .” ~ Mr. Nepotism . . . returns with his customary ‘67ish year-old’ use of name-calling, insults, and threats. Watch your postings as he makes all the liberal ones disappear.

Posted 39 days ago.

thegreek

And, If Lanza hadn't obtained the guns from his mama, do you not think he would have found some other way to obtain them as many crooks do?? Shoot, he may have even obtained them from Eric Holder if he would have just asked..

Posted 39 days ago.

thegreek

There is no fibbing on the part of the NRA.!! They are common people standing up against some air head lawmakers proposal that is not gonna help at all as Joe Biden already admitted. "Nothing we are gonna do would have prevented Newtown" is exactly what HE said and he was at least being honest !!! SO why is everyone wasting their time proposing sweeping gun laws??? There is a hidden agenda !!It is obvious !!

Posted 39 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or