| Latest Post: Started By: Rank: Category Are "gun-rights" advocates who say they "need" combat-style weaponry to "protect the nation from dictatorship" dangerous anarchists who are endangering the REAL Second-Amendment rights of law-abiding Americans with their paranoid, anti-government rants?None of the recent suggested actions by the President or the Biden task force concerning universal background checks or the regulation of military-style weapons and high-capacity magazines poses a serious threat to the Second Amemdment rights of law-abiding Americans ... Yet, NRA honcho Wayne LaPierre, and the usual gaggle of hotheads that support him, say that Americans need to be "ready if necessary" to use these weapons to fight against "dictatorship". What "dictatorship"? This isn't Syria or Nazi Germany. The only actions relating to guns that President Obama took during his first term was to allow guns to be taken on board AMTRAK trains and brought into national parks ... Do the paranoid and delusional beliefs of some (though not all) gun-advocates disqualify them from being mentally sound enough to purchase or own guns? The 2008 "Heller v District of Columbia" ruling says that the government DOES have a right to prohibit mentally-defective Member CommentsKunectdotsNo greek, I disagree with you! The effort that Munster puts into his diatribes tells me that he too believes in the literal social transformation of America just as much as idol Obama. Perhaps it's because of mistaken choices in employment, on Munster's part, that he feels boxed-in and sees Obama's rampant liberal policies as his only means of continued sustenance. If my suspicion is accurate, that makes Munster SELFISH... on top of displaying bad judgment. Posted 7 days ago. MunsterWell I hate to burst your bubble geek but I own several weapons myself !And yes the more I interact with the fools who post on here it confirms that there are indeed psychotic nutjobs around ! Posted 7 days ago. thegreekAye aye Kunect. We need to own weapons because morons like Munster are too easily convinced that everyone that owns a gun is a psycho like Lanza and the wierdo in Colorado. Posted 7 days ago. KunectdotsYOU just keep right on feeling that way, Bud. There's also "NO VALID REASON" to listen to you. Posted 7 days ago. MunsterHeres the truth !!!! No civilian needs to own a military assault weapon !There is NO VALID REASON !!! Posted 7 days ago. Kunectdots"Study sheds light on guns" You can find the entire study and its findings at: h ttp://b it.l y/15A2Gtx Sam Ludtman Reno GOSH, DARN IT MUNSTER!!!! That study was conducted WITH Americans having access to military-APPEARING weapons. Posted 7 days ago. MunsterHere is the truth . . . If you are as much of a pathetic whining crybaby in person as you are here . . . There is NO VALID REASON for you own any weapon.Because of your mental instability ! Fact: Some mentally unstable people do slip trough the cracks in GUN background checks. We are Ohio.co m Posted 7 days ago. R1KRA8Here is the truth . . . If you are as hostile, volatile, and aggressive in person as you are here . . . There is NO VALID REASON for you own any weapon. Fact: Some do slip trough the cracks in GUN background checks. Posted 7 days ago. MunsterHeres the truth !!!! No civilian needs to own a military assault weapon !There is NO VALID REASON !!! Posted 7 days ago. R1KRA8Your problem is you start with name-calling, insults, and wild claims. If you tell the TRUTH you shouldn't need any "name-calling, insults, and wild claims". FACT: Criminals and the mentally ill ignore Gun Laws just as Munster ignores the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy with his name-calling and insults. See Munster postings for an example of this TRUTH. Posted 7 days ago. MunsterFACT: Criminals and the mentally ill(wrongriki) ignore Gun Laws just as wrongriki ignores the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy with his name-calling and insults. Posted 7 days ago. R1KRA8FACT: Criminals and the mentally ill ignore Gun Laws just as Munster ignores the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy with his name-calling and insults. Posted 7 days ago. stickhaulerNo free, I read very well. IF you can quailfy for the licenses required for destructive devices, and you've got deep enough pockets to afford the gun itself (just a WAG, probably a third of a million dollars, or more), and still have a few thousand per round left over, you too can own such a device. I even know a guy who has a WW-II tank, a Patton I believe, with a working cannon. You'd probably want to invest in some major real estate to be able to shoot though, those critters have some range to them, even at low charge per round. You'd be better off with a mortar, you can elevate the tube enouugh that you can bring the round down right beside you. Be sure to duck! Posted 7 days ago. KunectdotsWTF are YOU talking about Munster? You're questioning stickhauler about the possibility of owning "105mm howitzer with ....ammo" when he just told you it was possible IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT and YOU accuse HIM of "you didn't read it all or just decided to leave out one piece of info" ARE you incredibly stupid or simply unable to comprehend what you've JUST BEEN TOLD? I think, through his recent absence here, your old buddy "I use my REAL NAME" oneill is beginning to understand that the corruption of Obama can not hide from the light much longer and he (oneill) doesn't want to go down as The Village Fool. It's an abject lesson to which YOU may want to pay attention. Posted 7 days ago. MunsterAgain , you didn't read it all or just decided to leave out one piece of info !( 105mm howitzer with ....ammo ) Posted 8 days ago. stickhaulerYou can own a 105 mm, all it takes is the license, and either a loaded wallet or credit cards with unlimited credit level. They're pretty expensive, as is the ammo. And getting the license to allow you to own destructive devices takes a lot of time and effort. You also have to notify law enforcement any time you transport it anywhere. Posted 8 days ago. Post a Comment |