Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
7 minutes ago.
by R1KRA8
oneill
#1

Are "gun-rights" advocates who say they "need" combat-style weaponry to "protect the nation from dictatorship" dangerous anarchists who are endangering the REAL Second-Amendment rights of law-abiding Americans with their paranoid, anti-government rants?

None of the recent suggested actions by the President or the Biden task force concerning universal background checks or the regulation of military-style weapons and high-capacity magazines poses a serious threat to the Second Amemdment rights of law-abiding Americans ... Yet, NRA honcho Wayne LaPierre, and the usual gaggle of hotheads that support him, say that Americans need to be "ready if necessary" to use these weapons to fight against "dictatorship". What "dictatorship"? This isn't Syria or Nazi Germany. The only actions relating to guns that President Obama took during his first term was to allow guns to be taken on board AMTRAK trains and brought into national parks ... Do the paranoid and delusional beliefs of some (though not all) gun-advocates disqualify them from being mentally sound enough to purchase or own guns? The 2008 "Heller v District of Columbia" ruling says that the government DOES have a right to prohibit mentally-defective

 
 

Member Comments

Munster

Yeah and still .......! If it were necessary , maybe, but you cant even think of one good reason ! Just because your weak minded and led by the nose by your right-wing propaganda , that isn't a good legitimate reason ! Being indoctrinated doesn't make you right !

Posted 13 days ago.

Kunectdots

HERE'S MY REASON MUNSTER! The Obama Administration.

Posted 13 days ago.

Munster

Yeah and still .......! If it were necessary , maybe, but you cant even think of one good reason !

Posted 14 days ago.

thegreek

Wow. This could take forever. I see you are now expanding the verbage. No legitimate, valid, reasonable, sensible, inexpensive, tolerable, exceptional, realistic, and on and on.

Posted 14 days ago.

Munster

And still , there is NO LEGITIMATE , VALID , reason for a civilian to own a military assault weapon ! You numbnuts still cant come up with a good legitimate reason , can you ?

Posted 14 days ago.

thegreek

1 word. #1 reason why we need assault rifles. Because there are morons out there that are a dumb as you trying to take them from us. 2nd word. DO NOT ever try to take a gun from someone standing in front of the muzzle. That is a good way to get GUTSHOT!!

Posted 14 days ago.

Munster

And still , there is NO LEGITIMATE , VALID , reason for a civilian to own a military assault weapon ! an assault weapon is most commonly defined as a semi-automatic firearm possessing certain cosmetic, ergonomic, or construction features similar to those of military firearms. Semi-automatic firearms fire one bullet (round) each time the trigger is pulled; the spent cartridge case is ejected and another cartridge is loaded into the chamber, without requiring the manual operation of a bolt handle, a lever, or a sliding handgrip. An assault weapon has a detachable magazine, in conjunction with one, two, or more other features such as a pistol grip, a folding or collapsing stock, a flash suppressor, or a bayonet lug.

Posted 14 days ago.

The Truth About Assault Weapons

****assaultweapon.info

Posted 15 days ago.

Munster

And still , there is NO LEGITIMATE , VALID , reason for a civilian to own a military assault weapon !

Posted 15 days ago.

Why do civilians need assault weapons?

By Mark Almonte

Posted 15 days ago.

Munster

And still , there is NO LEGITIMATE , VALID , reason for a civilian to own a military assault weapon !

Posted 15 days ago.

Pentagon scrubs 3D gun plans from Internet, says designer

By Perry Chiaramonte

Posted 15 days ago.

Munster

What part of "if they cant get these weapons they cant use them"dont you understand ?

Posted 15 days ago.

Munster

And still , there is NO LEGITIMATE , VALID , reason for a civilian to own a military assault weapon !

Posted 15 days ago.

Munster

Well geek I'm afraid your wrong again ! Yes the government has the authority to tell you which guns you can legally own ! They already don't allow certain weapon to be owned by civilians ! Sorry about your luck !

Posted 15 days ago.

thegreek

AND the gun rights advocates that Oneill is referring to in the title or subject of this thread is THE FOUNDING FATHERS OF THIS COUNTRY... THE FRAMERS OF THE CONSTITUTION..

Posted 15 days ago.

thegreek

YOu aint got the authority to tell people they do not need an assault rifle here in the USA. NEITHER does the GOVERNMENT!!

Posted 15 days ago.

thegreek

Munster, what part of IT IS MY GUN AND MY BUSINESS SO KEEP YOUR NOSE TO YOURSELF DONT YOU UNDERSTAND ???

Posted 15 days ago.

Munster

Yeah that's why El Lardass is losing money !

Posted 15 days ago.

Munster

What part of "if they cant get these weapons they cant use them"dont you understand ?

Posted 15 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or