Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
309 days ago.
by BeRight
BeRight
#1

The Sequester is nothing more than small decrease in the rate of increase in federal spending OVER 10 YEARS. President Obama should be the one to choose where the $85 billion in cuts should come from THIS YEAR since THE SEQUESTER was HIS IDEA TO BEGIN WIT

The President needs to lead on this issue he created instead of campaigning against it.

 
 

Member Comments

BeRight

-- BO said this with a straight face today: Even though most people agree that I'm being reasonable, that most people agree that I am presenting a fair deal. Translation: tax increase tax increase tax increase

Posted 508 days ago.

luvthesouth

munster, how different of a comment would quench your desire of repeating the same thing over and over again? if agreeing with your thought process is the remedy, then i will accept your remedial redundancy.

Posted 508 days ago.

BeRight

Warren, Dem, has claimed Cherokee and Delaware Indian heritage, but the only proof so far seems to be stories she says she heard from family members as a child. Cherokee groups have demanded documentation of the candidate’s Native American ancestry, but she hasn’t delivered.

Posted 508 days ago.

luvthesouth

munster, do you have anyone to clean out and change the newspaper in the bottom of your cage? you parrot the same one-liner insults over and over again. i thought Obama outlawed torture.

Posted 509 days ago.

thegreek

LTS, you are probably right. Sad people cannot see that.

Posted 509 days ago.

luvthesouth

thegreek, they will be contacted with information regarding the time and place where their presence will be required to work for the funds credited to their government debit card. no excuses allowed. we will be told it is a dire situation calling for dire measures. the concerned politicians will wring their hands and say there was nothing we could do. now report to your mandatory job placement and don your uniform. remember you voted for our control!

Posted 509 days ago.

thegreek

I'd like to know what the plans are for those that are getting entitlements when the economy collapses because there aren't enough working taxpayers to support the system????

Posted 509 days ago.

scrappile

OH lets do the math 83 billion times 10 years= Wall street owns K streets who owns congress, who owe Citizens of this republic explanations

Posted 511 days ago.

scrappile

that they are getting?…It is working like an insurance policy. Ordinary folks pay for homeowners insurance. Ordinary folks pay for car insurance. And these big financial institutions are getting cheaper borrowing to the tune of $83 billion in a single year simply because people believe that the government would step in and bail them out. And I’m just saying, if they are getting it, why shouldn’t they pay for it?

BERNANKE: I think we should get rid of it

Posted 511 days ago.

scrappile

During a Senate Banking committee hearing today, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) grilled Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on whether Wall Street banks should have to pay back taxpayers for the implicit funding advantage those banks receive by virtue of being viewed as “too big to fail”. According to a Bloomberg News study, big banks are essentially subsidized by about $83 billion per year because investors anticipate that those banks will be saved by the government if they get in trouble.

“These big financial institutions are getting cheaper borrowing to the tune of $83 billion in a single year simply because people believe the government would step up and bail them out. If they are getting it, why shouldn’t they pay for it?” asked Warren:

... WARREN: So I understand that we’re all trying to get to the end of “too big to fail”. But my question, Mr. Chairman, is until we do, should those biggest financial institutions be repaying the American taxpayer that $83 billion subsidy th

Posted 511 days ago.

luvthesouth

oh the agony...let the blood-letting begin. hand wringing politicians squirming and the president eating his own (fill in the blank). entertainment at its best.

Posted 511 days ago.

BeRight

To put this into perspective, these cuts are $85 billion. Apple is sitting on $137 billion cash. $85 Billion is chump change. If agencies in the US Gov’t cannot find a way to cut 1.5% out of their budgets, the Gov’t is even more messed up than first thought. The media is focused on the number 85 Billion. It is not that big of s deal. The problem is every agency is going to protect their goodies and make the citizens suffer by cutting personnel. It shows you what disdain the gov’t has for their citizens

If the President has any guts he would demand that the cuts come from something besides laying off folks. There is fat in every departments budget, repeat every single one.

If you set your thermostat to 74, turning it down to about 73 is 1.5%. Are you really going to notice?

Posted 511 days ago.

scrappile

400 billion, with a b, spent on grounded fighter jet. But somebody became a millionaire at the govt.`s expense

Posted 512 days ago.

BeRight

Munster says: If your going to cut , cut straight across the board ! Senators , house members , generals etc , etc !- we could do without those folks longer than air traffic controllers, Airport security, meat inspectors etc. Mismanagement starts at the very top.

Posted 512 days ago.

BeRight

Every major industry has learned to do with less over the last 4 years and they have magically become more profitable. Gov’t agencies have just gotten used to more and more.

Posted 512 days ago.

BeRight

oneill: everything I have seen or read in regards to sequester has to do with laying off people. That would mean, in the private sector, that the entity in question is running at top efficiency and the only way to cut costs in a downtime is to reduce spending. In the private sector scenario, the entity’s highest cost which are personnel so layoffs happen. There is not one Gov’t agency that can be accused of running at 100% lean and mean efficiency. There has to be, repeat one hundred times, there has to be many areas within each agency to reduce costs before going to layoffs of personnel. Problem is that no one has been called on the carpet to make efficiencies happen. When someone gets used to only more money coming in every year, a lazy management style kicks in. The Sequester is a reduction in increases, not reductions in current dollars. Layoffs are the manager’s easy way out. Gov’t has no mangers, just appointees. Every major industry has learned to do with less over the last

Posted 512 days ago.

BeRight

Shale Gas.....Sequester?????????/

Posted 513 days ago.

scrappile

No govt. subsidies for Nascar, let Rupert pay for it.

No qualified divedend rates, if a local masonry contractor pays a non effective tax rate of 35%, so should those that receive the "qualified" dividends, remember it has took many things to create 17 trillion in debt, not just poor and elderly programs.

Posted 513 days ago.

scrappile

Ok it is the belief that the new shale oil/gas boom will create tertiary jobs, same can be said for our crumbling infrastructure, bridges are at the woest safety rating nationwide since ronnie was costarring as leader of the free world. Now that being said what oversight is there for money going to Afghanistan for their rebuilding of infrastructure, there are numerous reports of govt. funds coming in and leaving with Afghani officials the same day, never to be seen again. Stiffy if you lost money in the market, look up Blankfein,Gov. Kashcow, and HSBC,Chase, Duetche Bank, the federal reserve, and Phil Gramm(lets combine banking and investing, like was done in the 1920`s, What could go wrong?) to file your complaint. Once again one hack of a lot of millionaires are created by the militarial industry, if you are a convicted felon, you should not be able to do this.

Posted 513 days ago.

scrappile

Forgot to give credit to Christian Science Moniti=or, I do apologize, but once again the Times site, does not allow for FULL posting of site info. I am used to posting on sites that allow dot com/org/gov...

Posted 513 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or