Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
8 hours ago.
by Stillhere
BeRight
#1

Barack Obama Legacy

BBB

 
 

Member Comments

Kunectdots

"and the Democrats gave them a chance...the democrats moved on !SIMPLE AS THAT !!" (ohwiseone quote)

Hey, ohwiseone! GOOD! Now the Democrats, being on the backside of a situation like that henceforth, will surely understand the principle of it.

Let's dig out those @350 bills, that the Republican controlled House passed and Prince of Obstructionist Harry Reid shoved into his desk, and have a gander at them.

What's it called, "majority rules", "elections have consequences" YOU BETCHA!

Posted 119 days ago.

Ohwiseone

You see greek Obama isn't alone being criticized !

Posted 119 days ago.

Ohwiseone

The 935 lies of George W. Bush / Yes, you already knew ...www dot sfgate dot com

Posted 119 days ago.

Ohwiseone

And as I've said , it wasn't "shut up and lay down " as much as it was the republicans were going to totally obstruct ANYTHING Obama put forth !!! And the democrats gave them their chance and when the republiduds obstructed , the democrats moved on !SIMPLE AS THAT !!

Posted 120 days ago.

Kunectdots

Barack Obama's greatest margin for carrying the popular vote majority was in 2008, with 52.93%.

The following gentlemen held greater popular vote garnering. Warren Harding, Calvin Coolidge, Franklin Roosevelt (4 times), Richard Nixon, Lyndon Johnson, Theodore Roosevelt, Ronald Reagan, Andrew Jackson, HERBERT HOOVER, Dwight Eisenhower, George H. W. Bush, Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses Grant.

There's a whole lot of "land-sliding" that has occurred throughout America's presidential history and not all of it has proven to be positive for the nation.

Posted 121 days ago.

Kunectdots

If even Blue Dog DEMOCRATS were uninvited to participate in Health Care Reform legislation, it would be a cute trick for YOU to provide credible evidence that mainstream Republicans WERE NOT disenfranchised with them by the 2009 Obama majority. The creation of Obama's landmark piece of legislation WAS rife with Democratic disincentive for input from the Republicans. That IS "Shut up and lay down" in political parlance.

BTW - Please notice the source of info was NOT Fox News!

h ttp://w ww.nytimes.c om/2009/05/12/us/politics/12dems.html?adxnnl=1&ref=us&adxnnlx=1242133580-BAMJSJYbmjbBoEQASz72Zg&_r=0

Posted 121 days ago.

Ohwiseone

And please prove that the democrats ever said "shut up and lay down "!Or is that again one of your right-wing bullsh^t whacko lines of propaganda ?

Posted 121 days ago.

Ohwiseone

5 Million in 2012 , 8 1/2 million in 2008 ! Yes that's a landslide !

Posted 121 days ago.

Kunectdots

NO! "Your majority" will be in the hands of the Republicans, come January. I expect the sides WILL switch on whom will then be considered the obstructionists.

But, that's OK! The Democrats will then understand what it means to be told to shut up and lay down when it comes to SOME MATTERS craving compromise.

BTW - With the win by Obama, in 2008, he beat John McCain by not quite 7 percentage points of the popular vote.

In 2012 he won by carrying 51-52% of the popular vote.

I don't think either case constitutes a "landslide" victory.

Posted 121 days ago.

Ohwiseone

And before you get too far ahead of yourself konect , its the will of ALL THE PEOPLE !!!Remember , Obama was elected by a landslide not once but twice ! There's your majority !

Posted 121 days ago.

Ohwiseone

One side has decided to (block (an opening, path, road, etc.); be or get in the way of.) Or obstruct,And nobody said anything about "rolling over" but deciding to do the exact opposite of taking care of the peoples business and sacrificing the common good of said people to basically get their own way !Yeah since the republicans were successful with this idiotic traitous strategy , just what do you now expect the democrats to do ?

Posted 121 days ago.

Kunectdots

Define the word "Obstructionist", then roll it into the fundamental reasoning for the creation of a bicameral US Congress, with as many political parties represented that can support their own philosophical weight over time.

Then, point out the actual itemized mentioning, by the Founding Fathers, that expressed where any opposing parties were supposed to roll over and spread their legs for those with which they disagree.

Then, explain how those, composed into a party, that are elected to represent the will of the people survive subsequent elections are considered to be obstructing the will and the business of the people "and I'LL listen to it"!

After all of that, you're welcome to documenting all the wounding incurred to the American female sect in "THE WAR ON WOMEN".

Posted 121 days ago.

Ohwiseone

I'll tell you what , you come up with a logical , real reason for this obstruction and I'll listen to it !

Posted 121 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Nope , your in denial that your republicans are doing what they are doing !

Posted 121 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Really it just boils down to the fact that it's Obama doing it and thats all !Pretty sad really !

Posted 122 days ago.

Ohwiseone

And it all depends on who is giving the estimate greek !The ones you get are horsesh^t !

Posted 122 days ago.

Ohwiseone

I think your numbers are wrong greek !

Posted 124 days ago.

Ohwiseone

He just realized how pointless it is trying to enlighten the indoctrinated republiduds !You just cant cut through that programming !

Posted 124 days ago.

BeRight

Fred was busy trying to get Democrats elected during the last cycle.

Posted 124 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Nah , he just got tired pointing out the republiduds errors here ! It would be like having 20 kids , all arguing at the same time !

Posted 124 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or