""""1) Obama is not trying to destroy the country""""
OK what is he TRYING to do?? Drinking beer and shooting pool during a border crisis??
He is not trying to do anything. Crisis after crisis he is campaigning and partying and goofing around and then takes to the mike to rag on Republicans... WOW..
Mod can I claim the 5th?
Kun- going back a bit, while again one cannot prove a negative, one can prove the positive counter.
1. Obama is Not Muslim- He is Christian. He attended a christian church for many many years. The Far Right helped established that fact. Obama also declared himself to be a Christian. So it's up to those that think he is Muslim to come up with something solid like Obama praying on a rug in a Mosque or literally saying, "I am Muslim". It hasn't happened and will probably never happen.
2. Obama is not the devil. Really? Do I really have to counter this somehow?
3. Obama is not a Marxist. Obama is the President outr capitalistic based society. The stock market still works. People still make wages. Unions still fight for worker rights. There is still a tax code that is based on a capitalistic formula. So unless you have something else that really shows him to being a Marxist..you got nothing.
It's up to you Kun to prove otherwise. Getting upset doesn't achieve that.
The Far Right fears, literally quakes in their booties at Obama. They make him out to be this imperial tyrant that weilds executive orders like a deadly weapon. Yet the US is still here. So there are only 2 basic possibilites.
1) Obama is not trying to destroy the country and the Far Right are delusional.
2) Obama is trying to destroy America but he isn't good at it, so the Far Right has nothing to worry about.
Which sounds more likely?
beright-I believe those lost e-mails include some that coincided with the pom pom boys' administration.Would you testify about unfamiliar info?Didnt think so. I wonder if scooter libby can account for all of his time. (-;
How would you know they ARE,kunec?
Kendall - AND when you state "....a person cannot prove a negative." - why do you make statements discrediting things that you are uncertain of, that may be well afoot without you being given notification of it and still are possible scenarios, as if they ARE already provable fact? Are you in on the meetings between Obama and Valerie Jarrett?
I'll stick with my debate skills there, Skippy. You can have your wizard's hat, Psychology degree and unsupportable prognostication ability, demonstrated by your "No one's out to do this or that" statements. How the H-ell would you know?
Mod, the emails are still "lost". And if there was equal “scrutiny” as the IRS claims, why would Lerner be inclined to claim the 5th if everything was above board? First they claim nothing was done wrong but emails were lost and Lerner ain’t talkin. I may have a short memory but you seem to be overly gullible to BS.
"What assurances can you give to support those particular claims? I answer; Absolutely NONE."
I suggest you learn debate 101....a person cannot prove a negative.
"Is The Border Crisis Obama's Katrina? Dam-n Right It Is!"
h ttp://w ww.youtube.c om/watch?v=lN8JnkaxJuQ
Also, be sure to check out how Wonder Boy is dismissing our soldiers from their jobs while demanding $3,800,000,000 for HIS alien invasion problem.
h ttp://w ww.breitbart.c om/Big-Peace/2014/07/14/Obama-s-Pentagon-Cuts-Thousands-Of-Military-Officers-Including-Some-On-The-Battlefield
Kinda presumptuous with your assumptions on questions 2 and 4. What assurances can you give to support those particular claims? I answer; Absolutely NONE.
No one is trying to push Obama's "sins" away as you claim. Rational people try to look at his Presidency in the grander context of history.
Does Obama make mistakes? Yep..no one denies that.
Is Obama out to destroy the nation? No.
Does Obama's foreign policies suck? Mostly yes.
Is Obama Muslim? The Devil? Marxist?..etc No.
I think it is both with you, greek.But, again, how about the political affiliation of the irs head honcho when these 501 exemption requests were first being scrutinized?
The fact that you mention - (in response to posted pro-gun viewpoints)- the actions of a little murderer in Connecticut in response as evidence supportive with someone wanting to react to it with a tightening of gun ownership laws tends to show 'your spots', Skippy.
That reaction, on your part, is about as immature as your propensity for attempting to brush Obama's sin away by pointing to those of characters that are no longer a relative to the political process.
"Remember to vote the traitors out that voted to give the UN our guns too."
If anyone believes that ANYTHING that happens in the UN would take away our weapons, you are dumb as sh*t.
That and of course the annoying fact that there has been no vote to remove our weapons in the UN. This fact might keep getting in the way of your fantasies but have any govt agents ever take any of your weapons away in the last 6 years? No?...think about that.
"I don't need the availability or exercise of my 2nd Amendment rights decided by his deluded actions...or your deluded beliefs."
Obviously Govt disagrees. And as I have implied many times, has Obama or any of his mystery executive orders to take away guns EVER affected you yet? Or anyone you know?
Interesting...what are my beliefs on this topic? If you can declare them "deluded" then you must know what they are....go ahead and tell us.
More coffin nails -The federal government is continuing to dole out billions of dollars to people who shouldn't get them. A government watchdog agency said an estimated $106 billion in payments were made in error last year: meaning they were the wrong amount, went to the wrong person or lacked sufficient documentation. These payments include tax refunds, unemployment benefits, Social Security benefits, and Medicare and Medicaid coverage. The improper payments could be even higher since not all agencies reported to the Government Accountability Office. The White House acknowledged that "the loss to the Federal Government is significant," but it pointed to a declining overall error rate: Just 3.5% from 5% in 2009.
Well said Kunnect. Also the stupid law would not have changed or prevented that event or any others. It would have taken guns from law abiding citizens. Remember to vote the traitors out that voted to give the UN our guns too. Manchin in WV and Sherrod "sh1t hed Brown.
"Hmmmm...was there some kind of mass shooting that happened that involved a person getting a dangerous weapon from his mother and killing a bunch of kids?" ~ Kendall78
Well, Kenny, if your talking about that little, whacked-out Cretin that killed his mom with her gun then headed off to Sandy Hook, I don't need the availability or exercise of my 2nd Amendment rights decided by his deluded actions...or your deluded beliefs. Thank You Very Much.
"Perry urges Obama to send National Guard troops"
Of course Obama wants to lay back on his constitutional responsibility to protect ALL OF AMERICA (not just Texas) in hopes that the Texas authorities will be forced to react so that Obama will have a propaganda point to put forward about how 'another Republican administration is being cruel to Hispanics". OF COURSE, THAT'S NOT PLAYING POLITICS, IS IT MR. PRESIDENT?
h ttp://w ww.youtube.c om/watch?v=-M7P2Nh3AS0
700 Channel Lane , Marietta, OH 45750 | 740-373-2121