Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
1 day ago.
by Ohwiseone
BeRight
#1

Barack Obama Legacy

BBB

 
 

Member Comments

BeRight

ObamaLand: Nancy Pelosi praised Obama as "one of the most "practically" non-partisan presidents I have seen in the White House" who is intent on finding bipartisan agreement.

The other side points out: "Minority Leader Pelosi has voted against every jobs bill the Republicans have put forward in this Congress, including construction of the Keystone pipeline, the SKILLS job training bill and the Working Families Flexibility Act which offered working parents a more flexible work schedule.

I guess it is not a good idea unless a Dem comes up with it.

Posted 417 days ago.

thegreek

His legacy is to exploit trajedies for political gain !!!

Posted 429 days ago.

BeRight

The legacy is gettin' a little muddled.

Posted 432 days ago.

BeRight

Under BO, the NSA continues its unprecedented data grab and domestic spying. This is the same program BO campaigned against. What a hypocrite. Then when he is called to explain, he says the program is not what we think. Even Eugene Robinson thinks that is hooey.

Welcome to Obam land.

Posted 441 days ago.

BeRight

Arab Spring

Posted 444 days ago.

BobDahler

Apparently you have forgotten: Way back then, I agreed that you had a valid point.

Posted 444 days ago.

BobDahler

Yes, Kunect... I DO remember.

Posted 445 days ago.

BobDahler

BeRight, I don't recall saying this scheme was good OR bad, and I certainly didn't "OK" the concept.

Posted 445 days ago.

thegreek

His legacy is that he cant stand Americans.

Posted 445 days ago.

Kunectdots

BobDahler - Apparently you must have missed all my ranting, on former threads here, about Jeff Immelt serving as both the present, floundering CEO of General Electric AND Barack Obama's (former) head of his Jobs Creation Council.

That incestuous relationship represented a conflict of interest with me because of Obama's drive for abandonment of fossil fuels, in favor of green technologies, and Jeff "I haven't moved the GE stock value" Immelt needing new markets for GE's involvement.

ObamaCare? Medical digitized data transfer technologies in abundance need there. Who's ALSO into manufacturing such capable devices? Good ole GE.

Posted 445 days ago.

BeRight

So private funding is OK for bringing electricity to Africa but it is not possible to use private funding to re-start White House Tours?

Posted 445 days ago.

BobDahler

luvthesouth: I stand corrected on the source of the funding for this enterprise. Happy Fourth to you too!

Posted 445 days ago.

BeRight

OK, I guess the White House tours for elementary students are still off. But the DCSC folks will be still furloughed since the Gov’t can’t manage its own budget. Which reminds me of the Air traffic controller’s fiasco: When it was decided to furlough controllers and keeping with the Obama mandate to make it as painful on the public as possible, the controllers were all furloughed on the same day at the busiest airports causing massive backups.

A more rational person would have furlough controllers at the smallest and less busy airports and spread the furloughs over a seven day period. What a bunch of hooey.

Posted 445 days ago.

luvthesouth

good morning and happy 4th of july to you bob. from cnn, it was reported that the 7 billion was being promised as part of an initiative that will be funded as follows.."The program includes $1.5 billion from the U.S. Overseas Private Investment Corporation and $5 billion from the Export-Import Bank, the White House said." further research finds that the usopic and the e-i bank, which is part of the executive branch of government, operate outside of congressional approval. the latter entity being criticized for it's "politically motivated" lending habits. both lay claim to not costing taxpayers a dime, which should please everyone.

Posted 445 days ago.

BobDahler

He didn't "find" seven billion... He "called" for seven billion (over the next five years). The rest is up to Congress, that is controlled by Republican interests.

And thus begs the question: How far off is he from what you actually desire?

Seeing that General Electric will be the main benefactor of the largesse proposed by this administration, with the exploitation of the coal and oil reserves of South Africa... It is difficult for me to understand your characterization of Obama as a Green Weenie kind of guy. Quite the opposite it would seem to be.

Posted 445 days ago.

BeRight

Today Obama’s administration found 7 Billion dollars to set up windmills and green power in Africa but can't find a dime to have White House tours for elementary students. What a bunch of hooey. This coming month DCSC in Columbus and Dayton will be laying off workers because this administration won’t allow them to manage their budgets in a way to avoid layoffs. Obama wants maximum pain inflicted on the citizens in an effort to put the blame on someone else. More Hooey.

Legacy? Have at it.

Posted 447 days ago.

BobDahler

Yes I can, (not go there). Have a good 4th everyone.

Posted 448 days ago.

Kunectdots

BobDahler - Please excuse the double-negative BUT - You CAN'T "not dive into the political aspect of this". It is our national energy policy and it is surrounded by politics.

Take the proposed Keystone Pipeline project for instance. IF it's construction across the continental US is squashed by the ballyhooing of Leftist environmental groups (until this point, some of DEMOCRAT Obama's staunchest supporters) it will instead be built to the Canadian Pacific coast. There, it will be loaded onto tankers for shipment to, and BURNING IN, China. Release of CO2, from the burning of that oil from our backyard will benefit the Chinese economy and leave us just as dependent upon our friends, the Islamic Jihadists, for our economic survival.

I see a lot of "politics" at work there.

Posted 449 days ago.

BeRight

Perhaps someone can explain how to burn fossil fuel without emitting CO2.

Lowering the emission limit on CO2 kills coal in this country.

Exports of coal are at an all time high since others continue to burn coal for power.

Maybe it is like punishing ourselves for other’s sins.

Posted 449 days ago.

BobDahler

I'll not dive into the political aspect of this, but simply ask: If not now, when should we act? You made the point about our inaction over the past four decades...

The mis-characterized "new" regulations that energy producers are now required to comply with, have been on the table for over 20 years and were finalized more than 10 years ago. During all that time, they were granted carte blanche deferrals of compliance. With ample time to prepare, these regulations came as no surprise to anyone in the industry.

Perhaps some of your wrath should be redirected toward the energy conglomerates.

Posted 449 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or