since i am not a gun guy...i'll take a stab(pun intended) at it. winchester 70 rifle verses AK-47 rifle. yep look different, originally designed with arguably different target(s) in mind....the 70 is not modifiable to full-auto...i assume. that may make the most difference outside of cosmetics, calibre, and capacity....i am leaving out engineering specifics such as muzzle velocity...etc..
And coaldust , you just move on through , you wouldnt understand it anyway, but be near when the perverted troll needs you to say "good point" ! OK ?
Well abby glad your back . But what I'm trying to convey is there is indeed a difference between your model 70 and a AK-74 !I didnt read the whole proposal but I'm thinking this proposal will be alot like Reaguns and your hunt'n rifles will be safe .
Weve been through this before oh ignorant perverted troll ! Certain military assault weapons and ammo are designed with features that cause the bullet to yaw(tumble) once in contact with flesh , which creates massive wound channels ! Of course being the expert you are , you would know that( NOT )And some ammo (russian mainly) the bullet is made with a air bubble in the tip that causes it to also tumble causing the same effect !
hey there OWO...missed ya buddy. i had a great trip and was glad to return home. a hope that all could say from time to time. i have been thinking on the gun control issue and have been mulling around some ideas. OWO, guns do for the most part what they are designed to do...and that is propell a projectile at a high velocity into a direction as dictated by the direction of the barrel.
And again , to those who oversee these forums , you need to look up and get the definition of Shopstewards "fluffer"(his word) comment . No one else here had any idea what the troll was talking about till some of us sought out the definition . Really quite perverse !
So we are to limit ourselves to guns "not designed to kill humans". Lol and what guns are those Fluffy pellet rifle, bb gun?
It just shows the sheer ignorance of the socialist left
Coal you are correct, by Fluffys logic, any home defense handgun would be outlawed as they are specificaly designed to kill humans. Not a lot of deer taken with a snub nosed 357 or 45 acp.
s u c k
Yes really !! Every gun has the potential to be a human killer or an animal killer... DUH... Some guns spend their entire life just being aimed at targets... IT IS THE PERSON BEHIND it that they do not understand...While they're at it.. They gonna restrict selling DUCT TAPE to all those RAPIST and killers that are using it to tape womens mouths up and their wrists and ankles so they don't scream... I see on TV that about 50% of the killers are using it for that.. Meanwhile, the honest regular people that may need it or want it to tape up a broken household item are just gonna have to*****it...
they dont want to restrict all guns just ones that are designed for the killing and maiming of humans !
One of the dumbest of all Fluffys statements, and thats quite a high bar
slinky best thing you could do is shut the he 11 up. Abby - good luck getting a response on that one. You will probably win the lottery first so go but tickets. LOL.
But abby ,glad to see you survived the weekend ? Anyway, they dont want to restrict all guns just ones that are designed for the killing and maiming of humans ! You can still have your guns ! And where was all this outrage when Reagun banned assault weapons ?
to the human condition and have committed heinous acts against others. in the end...the intent of the human is the enemy......the gun is the inanimate object that bears the brunt of the malice from the humans actions.
NCN....you have never really answered how you would solve the problems we have with folks mis-using or even in some instances using them in proper ways. we have removed the stigmas from so many that were closeted away in society for their and the general publics own good. sometimes with freedom comes the unintended consequences of said freedom. how do we rid the world or reckless people or even those where you consider them to be reckless. the right to bear arms should not superceed the right to safety and security which coincidentally offers the previous safety and security. we certainly can only count so much on our federal and local authorities to keep us safe. however, it could just be a sick social experiment in which we allow the loonies and killers more concern and judicial preference when such unfortunate crimes of the moment or even those resulting from critical planning unfold. i do belive there are many cases where the well-educated and long in patience have fallen victim t
You too stupid to realize
And as usual the troll shows just how ignorant it really is ! I'm not a socialist and I dont hate successful people but I would like to know why you idiots are so very afraid of change ! After all change is inevitable !
And I post tons of facts there dum-dum , you just dont like em ! And you seem to look past the idiotic defence that you and your little buddy tried to put up against those known facts , so all I can say is just get over it ! And yes it does prove those facts and no matter what you do or say it wont change them ! So whine away ! Exempted ! Did you 2 ever figure that one out ?
700 Channel Lane , Marietta, OH 45750 | 740-373-2121