Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
6 hours ago.
by Kunectdots
BeRight
#1

Barack Obama Legacy

BBB

 
 

Member Comments

Shopsteward

Nothing like a 50 yr old slimebag who claims he is a chick in his mind in the bathroom with your grand daughter

Posted 16 days ago.

Yeah its amazing alright . How quickly they switched from religious freedom to where to pee ! Only a republinut could come up with that crap !

Posted 16 days ago.

Shopsteward

Amazing isnt it Beright that anyone could support anything else

Posted 16 days ago.

BeRight

Loretta Lynch:

The US attorney general, Loretta Lynch, says North Carolina’s law requiring transgender people to use public restrooms that only correspond to the gender on their birth certificate is ‘state-sponsored discrimination’.

Posted 16 days ago.

I dont think anyone knows for sure ! Just the usual conservative crap of forcing their personal beliefs on others !

Posted 16 days ago.

BeRight

So Slink, what is the bill about?

Posted 16 days ago.

Ah but we are well aware of the deviance of our local pervert troll !

Posted 16 days ago.

Shopsteward

Of course not Beright nor could we tell if you were a deviant of aome sort. Thats the problem

Posted 16 days ago.

Gotta love how quickly the republinutz switched this crap from being a "religious freedom " bill to one of "where can I pee" bill ! Both are losers but the shift was truely amazing !

Posted 16 days ago.

BeRight

If I stood in front of you, could you tell by looking at me?

That would seem to be one of the big questions.

Do we put a tag on a trans so they can go and use the women's room or do we just trust?

Posted 16 days ago.

Why are you trans-gender ?

Posted 16 days ago.

BeRight

Please let me know when Loretta Lynch and the Feds decide on where I can pee.

It seems pretty easy but not when the feds get involved.

If you are a guy, trying walking into a women's room at the Great American Ball park and see what happens.

Posted 16 days ago.

And doofus , citing almost anything from a semi-credible source sometimes works but you just cant abide by that , you've got to dig into your own personal pile of bullsh^t propaganda to get your little nuggets of dumbassery .And even then you'll mis-interpret what was written to satisfy your need to mis-lead .

Posted 16 days ago.

Dis conect your hilarious !" Well, Obama & CO. have determined that Mr. John Doe is no longer capable of handling his financial affairs " And yet your republinutz appoint "emergency managers " to side step the legal lawfully elected local officals and insert their own draconian measures .That has worked out so well, Flint comes to mind here , and we all know what a success that was !

Posted 16 days ago.

NasCarNut

The Social Security administration lays out five specific criteria for recipients they plan to add to NICS. Those the agency plans to target must have filed a disability claim, been determined to be disabled because of a mental impairment, been officially diagnosed as mentally impaired, between the ages of 18 and 65, and have been assigned a representative payee because they were found by Social Security to be incapable of managing their benefit payments.

Posted 16 days ago.

Kunectdots

For those of you too LAZY to look up these sources OR always wanting to discredit the message by killing the messenger, like stinky, here's an excerpt from The Seattle Time's opinion.

"The administration is pushing to ban Social Security beneficiaries from owning guns if they lack the mental capacity to manage their own affairs, which could affect MILLIONS of people whose monthly disability payments are handled by others."

Posted 16 days ago.

Kunectdots

Don't like the Washington Free Beacon's version of the story?

OK, here's the same scoop from The Los Angeles Times.

"Obama pushes to extend gun background checks to Social Security"

h ttp://w ww.latimes.c om/nation/politics/la-na-gun-law-20150718-story.html

How about one from The Seattle Times?

"Obama goal: no guns for some on Social Security disability"

h ttp://w ww.seattletimes.c om/nation-world/obama-goal-no-guns-for-some-on-social-security-disability/

Posted 16 days ago.

Kunectdots

~ "found by Social Security to be incapable of managing their benefit payments." ???

So how many of the shooting deaths is that particular demographic responsible for on the streets of Chicago. or anywhere else for that matter?

I see it as just another niche effort by government Gun-grabbers to infringe upon the 2nd Amendment PRIVILEGES of some of America's least defensible citizenry.

HEY, MR. DRUG USER; Need a big screen TV or some nice jewelry to hock for some drug money? Well, Obama & CO. have determined that Mr. John Doe is no longer capable of handling his financial affairs and THEREFORE he can no longer possess a gun with which to defend himself from you. Easy pickins boys.

Posted 16 days ago.

The Washington Free Beacon is an American web site that publishes news and associated content. It states it is "dedicated to uncovering the stories that the powers that be hope will never see the light of day" ..... The Atlantic's Conor Friedersdorf called the Free Beacon's stated mission "decadent and unethical

Posted 17 days ago.

NasCarNut

ha ha...and some wonder what's wrong with this country...and they vote!!...smh

Posted 17 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or