"was shot in the back based on nothing"
It was probably based on eye witness accounts...not nothing. It was the only evidence available at the time.
.No charge for that cut rate observation. STILL overpriced.
"I won't get in the way"
Translation: I'm an intellectual coward.
Both may have occured, but I will side with the police until PROOF comes along. You may speculate ( make up things that fit your bias)
There is far more proof of his involvement in a robbery than that he was shot in the back or surrendered
Mod, you claim that this fine young man was shot in the back based on nothing, yer you ignore video that shows the saint strong arming a local business and assaulting a shop keeper. That's a thug and a punk.... You disagree?
Lol so you make it up until forced to face facts. Lol. Go ahead look as foolish as you like. I won't get in the way, I'll just enjoy the show of your vast ignorance. Begin.
I think the question has been aimed at you to come up with a scenerio for why a cop would shoot a person 6 times that was unarmed and not right close to them.
Why do you deflect? Not enough of an imagination to think for yourself?
"Running away was he Kendall? Does he run backwards, or you talking out your punk arse again."
Calm yourself son...you are being rather vulgar. Show a bit of class.
I am curious, do you not believe in adaption when new info comes forth? You seem to have an odd idea that whatever a person says at one point cannot change. Maybe that's how you think but most people don't.
When this story broke, we only had some reports to speculate from. Now we have more and therefor we adjust. There are still more autopsies to be done and perhaps more info shall come from them.
You go get em mod !
You have an annoying habit of labeling everyone a shadow to your left as deficient,tired.No charge for that cut rate observation.
They are trained to aim "center mass" mod !In a tense situation you revert to training ! Seems odd though that this is dredging up a lot of hatred ! Where theres smoke theres fire?????
You say "let the investigation conclude", "but I stand with law enforcement rather than a punk arse thug",tired.How telling,tired. It does now appear there is one potentially incriminating wound to the arm.Brown may have had his back to the cop, or he may have had his arm raised in a defensive posture, or he may have been in a surrendering mode. It would seem that his(cop)focus was not on disabling, but elimination.There were no shots to the 'below the waist' areas,huh.
Rally the troops ! Theres derision afoot !How hilarious !!
Seems to be a malady of conservative thinking ! Maybe you had better seek advice from one of your right-wing sources of ignorance !
Ah ,ah ,ah , that's name calling and against the rules !And using the term so loosely seems unwise when you had a "moron" (your word)in the white house for 8 years and we are still suffering from his "policies" ! How typical of you to only see whats convenient to your lop sided point of view !
Either way, another moron of the left.
Or perhaps it's Red our least favorite socialist crap bag.
I see you still haven't a clue !
Ah yes the cerebral muse ! Still as bright as ever !
700 Channel Lane , Marietta, OH 45750 | 740-373-2121