An "Immigration crisis" would involve not having enough of the formal documents, to be filled out by legal immigrants, or the Immigration officials to process them. What we are experiencing is an illegal INVASION and DUMPING of humanity across our borders. Consequently, there's no "Immigration crises", just an administration crises caused by a president that will not "faithfully execute" the laws. His plan is to irreversibly alter the fabric of American life as we've known it.
We have an immigration "crisis" (Obama words, not mine) but he chastises the Republicans for not passing an immigration bill that has its basis in amnesty for all those that have crossed our borders illegally. Emphasis on the word “illegally”. He ignores certain items that he does not like in laws he has championed, but calls the Republican Lawsuit suing him for not doing his job (you know, that pesky part about upholding the laws) a stunt. In one of the more out-of-touch, reality-denying interviews he's given, President Obama told Fox News host Bill O'Reilly that there was "not even a smidgeon of corruption" involved in the IRS's targeted harassment of the Tea Party and other conservatives. Soon after, the IRS says, whoops, it has lost all of the Werner emails during the exact time period in question. And Werner is still taking the 5th.
@Beright- I see no reasn why not. The Chicken Littles on the far Right were crying the sky was falling for the past six years and the US is still here.
Get a grip,beright.You ain't seen nuthin, yet.
2 more years. Can the country hold on that long?
Then, of course, the stories of how Iraqi's were fired upon, while trying to return injured US Army Pvt. Jessica Lynch to the American lines, necessitating them turning about so that US Spec. Ops could "RESCUE her" instead. h ttp://w ww.theguardian.c om/world/2007/apr/24/usa.marktran
Kendall - As to the capture of Ahmed abu Khattalah, I'm not going to "spin this to make it out like a bad thing". I just wonder WHY it took so long, with four different news teams interviewing him over the past 21 months.h ttp://w ww.nytimes.c om/2012/10/19/world/africa/suspect-in-benghazi-attack-scoffs-at-us.html?smid=tw-share&_r=2& It reminds of the story about how America's DOJ couldn't find/catch Bill Clinton's buddy, Marc Rich, when a US news team was able to talk to him on a Swiss ski slope. There's also the story that they knew of Usama bin Laden's location a 10 months (some suggest longer) before striking him. h ttp://w ww.realclearpolitics.c om/video/2012/05/07/general_obama_knew_of_bin_ladens_location_since_summer_of_2010.html (continued)
"Did we stop borrowing from China?"
If you are implying the US borrowed from China, perhaps you could tell us how much the US borrowed under the Obama administration and for what purpose.
Is that the best you have..........blame Bush? LOL. You must not remeber voting for Obama the last 2 times.
Did we stop borrowing from China?
We went deep into your mentioned "shxxtter",beright, when Bush signed an unfunded tax break, and borrowed from China to fund the Iraq and Afghanistan actions.How many jobs were lost during his administrations, and how many have been created since 2009? Hmmm.You haven't had to drop your membership to the club, so why are you whining ?
Was just reading about the Pacific reserve Obama wants to expand and the opposition from the Right it's creating. Odd how I don't remember the Right complain when Bush started the whole thing.
Just as Teddy Roosevelt had opposition from ranchers and such when he made our National Parks, Obama will come out on top of this.
Hmmm, the US has caught Ahmed abu Khattalah who is suppose to be involved with the Benghazi incident. Wonder how the far Right will spin this to make it out like a bad thing.
The SC gave the election to Bush before they knew the definite results of the election in Florida. Of course the SC also said that the Florida SC was wrong in doing a recount and called it unconstitutional.
I am really confused as always: First you talk about the Supreme court giving the election to Bush. I clarified what the SC was deciding. I make a comment on the E-college and you say Gore got more votes nationwide. First you discuss Florida and then you talk about the popular vote nationwide. Maybe you don’t know how the E-College works. As we found out you can get the most of the popular votes, but to win the election you need the E-college majority.
You have always been a fountain of misinformation, beright.And, so jealous of a certain 'do'.
"..they all concluded that Bush got the votes and maintained the lead."
I see a whole lot of blabber but no facts.
"Bush got the Electoral College because he got the most votes in Florida."
You are confused about the topic. The facts stand that Gore did get more votes in the nation than Bush.
"You should relax, your guy.."
I am perfectly relaxed...having the facts makes one relaxed. My guy? You mean Mccain? Because that's who I voted for.
Nice try on the Gore deal but the media did a complete anal examine of the vote count in Florida and they all concluded that Bush got the votes and maintained the lead. The Supreme Court simply said that the Democrats could not change the rules in the middle of the game. Bush got the Electoral College because he got the most votes in Florida. You should relax, your guy is doing a bang up job. He put us in the shXXtter just like he planned.
"Gitmo detainees? Let them rot in hell."
Sic semper tyrannis
And people wonder why the world calls us hypocrites.
Sorry Beright but Gore got more votes. Even if it wasn't true...the Supreme Court still gave it to Bush. They were not going by popular vote.
Please...a person tried to call a US citizen, one Barack Obama, that clearly won the election an occupier. I simply gave a better example of what an occupier would be.
Get a clue...get a clue...oh for heaven's sake get a freakin clue...
Gitmo detainees? Let them rot in hell.
700 Channel Lane , Marietta, OH 45750 | 740-373-2121