Well Kerry and the dems fell for it too. Wasn't just Bush and Cheney.
greek, you must still believe in the Easter bunny if you believe bush/cheney were giving us the straight poop ! It was a set - up.
also the guy,greek, whose family members were ushered safely out of the U.S. by bush and cheneys' minions immediately after the attack on the World Trade Center. Huuummm.
You are right Oneill. They had bad intel on Saddam. BUT he dropped chemical weapons on the KURDS didn't he??? Arent we ready to attack Assad for this very same thing alone ???? Sketchy intel also???
All I am saying is that it is your parties turn to put their money where their mouthes are and do it right. You all sure have crucified Bush and Cheney for making the similar decisions on sketchy intel. It is a good thing Hillary resigned or we would have been NUKED by now !!!WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE AT THIS POINT (Hillary Clinton to Congeress about the Benghazi scandal.)
AND I hate war. My 18 year old cousin was killed in Quang Nam in the Tet Offensive. While you were probably a college deferral and protesting the war !!
In reference to Assad,greek,...the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.google assad's father.
No. Hillary and Kerry voted FOR war in Iraq in the intel they had. We went there because of the twin towers. Remember that don't you ??? 3000 innocent Americans killed. Here we are again with sketchy intel and Obama and Kerry lobbying for a strike !! Same situation only no americans involved. your turn..
lts- she's baaaaaack (:
WRONG answer Oneill. You suggest they read a book on how to fight this war ???? OMG...Remember Kerry and Barry are lobbying to fire a shot over the bow of Syria... This is your parties chance to shine or own another war !!!
What do you suggest your beloved Barry do Oneill????????? Here is your chance to shine since you have been giving ole d u m b a s $ Cheney and Bush h e l l all this time. It is the dems turn for some no win situational WAR !!!
Oneill, your Dem. guys are about to be suckered into a war too so I would be cautious what you say. Barry don't know what to do so he turned it over to congress cause he ran on a no more war platform. It IS rather tough to see the pictures and hear Feinstein saying "people that vote NO have not seen the evidence that I have seen". It may just turn out to be more than a dumb republican hair brained move as you like to assess at!!!Russia has 2 destroyers in the area and their guns aint trained on Syria, they are trained on US...If/when we arrive, it may be an ambush !!!
and review the iraq operation from the beginning you will find that Saddam acted in much the same way as Assad and the intelligence community of many nations agreed. vast one-world conspiracy???? possibly or as now an proof-positive indicator of the ineffectiveness of the United Nations and many of its member nations.
moderation, without the ability to have accurate reporting on the ground in Syria, we are left to rely on less than reliable information regarding the actual guilty party. this observation is based on the number of news outlets that have stated such. your characterization of the apparent reversal in opinion of teabag/republicans based on political ideology may be valid, or could indicate a new way of thinking in regards to national threats verses the worlds police force point of view. one early report, which i believe still holds true, is that the Saudi's announced that they would cover all costs with the military intervention in Syria. on one hand this does eliminate one con argument against entering the conflict, but it also indicates that we can be bought as the worlds "gun-for-hire". that may be the case in all of our recent interventions, but this leaves no doubt as to our including the title of middle-east prostitute in our legacy. however, i do think if you go back an
The The Louisiana Purchase ?
Don't forget the last time this administration could not find votes for something unpopular. Remember the “Cornhusker Kickback"?
What would the payoff be for party loyalty on bombing Syria?
greek- sure it matters what you think.and you have the right to verbalize it as well. a point I would make is that if any country such as Syria would use chemical weapons on their population, how responsible could they be with a nuclear capability? radiation is the weapon that keeps on giving.
Most of our enemies already have nukes. What difference does it make. Keeps everyone honest. Besides, it doesn't matter too much what a peon like me thinks, does it. They use it on us, we punish them back.
How do you feel about Iran having a nuclear capability, greek?
700 Channel Lane , Marietta, OH 45750 | 740-373-2121