applies in international armed conflict. POWs are usually members of the armed forces of one of the parties to a conflict who fall into the hands of the adverse party. The third 1949 Geneva Convention also classifies other categories of persons who have the right to POW status or may be treated as POWs.
POWs cannot be prosecuted for taking a direct part in hostilities. Their detention is not a form of punishment, but only aims to prevent further participation in the conflict. They must be released and repatriated without delay after the end of hostilities. The detaining power may prosecute them for possible war crimes, but not for acts of violence that are lawful under IHL.
POWs must be treated humanely in all circumstances. They are protected against any act of violence, as well as against intimidation, insults, and public curiosity. IHL also defines minimum conditions of detention covering such issues as accommodation, food, clothing, hygiene and medical care.
referred to the base as the "legal equivalent of outer space." To the Bush administration, this was an immense advantage in the consideration of long-term detention. Guantanamo was central to the Bush Administration's prevention of the judicial review of the legal status of prisoners, a position invalidated by the Supreme Court in Boumediene v. Bush.
On January 4, 2002, U.S. Southern Command was directed to take custody of designated detainees within the United States Central Command area of responsibility, and to escort and hold the detainees at Guantanamo Bay for further disposition."
next we get into the classifications of POW's or just civilian detainees and rules for their treatment:
The rules protecting prisoners of war (POWs) are specific and were first detailed in the 1929 Geneva Convention. They were refined in the third 1949 Geneva Convention, following the lessons of World War II, as well as in Additional Protocol I of 1977.
The status of POW only applie
Moderation, good morning...you are partially correct in your premise of there being "no other place" to hold them. that is not quite accurate.
first-hand exerpt from a "The Atlantic" magazine interview:
"Some of the critical conditions necessary for the establishment of a detention facility were security and safety of the detainees, control, a certain freedom from legal review, timeliness, security, established supporting infrastructure, and cost managements. Contenders included Guam, Diego Garcia, Wake Island, and others, in addition to Guantanamo Bay.
One of the principal advantages to placing the detainees in Guantanamo Bay or a similar location was the legal status that non-U.S. soil provided. If the detainees weren’t in the U.S., then they wouldn’t have the same rights under American laws, the argument went. Some of these included the right to legal representation, rights of prisoners, and rights to the American legal system. One government official
You can give yourself all the points there are to receive,or not, I am offering nothing but fact,tired.You will surely win this 'against yourself only' argument.(;
Those girls are beginning to earn their keep.
well, tired,if my memory is accurate, there wasn't another place for the detainees.
It wasn't an issue that could be remedied with an eo, tired.No points.);
Moderation.....six democrats essentially prevented the closing of gitmo. One of which might garner my vote should they run for president....that is if my candidate is not on the ballot. You are correct congress exhibited some common sense for a change.
Stillhere "Hows he doing on that promise Kunnec? Same as closing Gitmo ". It goes without saying,again, but congress blocked the closing of gitmo,'member?
Respect is earned - NOT GIVEN... Explain why they left 4 American hostages behind and never even negotiated their release O Traitorous Wise One.. They gave away the farm to those that wish death to us all. How do you blame the republicans for that one..??? It is sheer liberal idiocy at work...
I imagine they're dusting off another for John Kerry, as we speak. The status surrounding those awards are obviously on a steady decline.
Well, we also have the observations of the overall decline of America on the world stage and who's responsible for it.
There's that AND "nit-picking", so we have that.
I was with the quote I posted and you answered...lol
lol, apparently you didn't watch the video...
"could you imagine yourself making that decision?"
Here's an oldie but a goodie.
"Remember when Obama promised that he would not take vacations if elected President?"
h ttps://w ww.youtube.c om/watch?v=68WS5B19LC4
I agree ribs is the way to go...don't care much for the dirty bird...
* beef or pork ugh!...need more coffee.
you know i have never really been a big fan of wings....now if you are talking beef of prok ribs...you better get a bigger plate or better yet just clear the table.
The Hot Wings from East of Chicago burn on the way and on the way out.
700 Channel Lane , Marietta, OH 45750 | 740-373-2121