Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
45 minutes ago.
by Stillhere
Valveguy
#1

Obamacare is not "FREE" health care

People have finally realized that the word “free” is nowhere to be found in Obamacare’s “ Affordable Health Care Act”. Coverage under President Barack Obama's health care law won't be cheap. A study released Thursday by the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation found that government tax credits would lower the sticker price on a benchmark "silver" policy to a little over $190 a month for single people making about $29,000, regardless of their age. For uninsured people who are paying nothing today, this is still a big cost that they're expected to fit into their budgets.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

Absolem you will never get an answer to your question, there is no end or value put on wealth (other people's) redistribution

Posted 45 minutes ago.

Stillhere

Nice to see fluffy mcpantload is back, guess the check came in and his internet is back on. Dont worry fluffy we will keep supporting you, we have no choice

Posted 53 minutes ago.

Ohwiseone

Abby , exactly ! What is this fabled fact from the RIGHTWINGERS ! Nascar, Oh ole grumpy pus$ gets it alright ! He just wont admit that its just more right wing propaganda !

Posted 4 hours ago.

NasCarNut

"wealth redistribution"is one of the rights attempts to demonize !

you didn't get the whole sentence, makes a difference...

Posted 8 hours ago.

Stillhere

wealth redistribution"is one of the rights

LOLOLOL Wealth redistribution is a RIGHT? Just exactly where is that right granted?

Posted 8 hours ago.

absolem

OWO....what is "wealth distribution" and if it exists, in what form should it take to be fair and equitable?

Posted 8 hours ago.

Ohwiseone

Idiotic name em and blame em bullsh&t ! "wealth redistribution"is one of the rights attempts to demonize !

Posted 1 day ago.

Stillhere

Its neither, its wealth redistribution GFY

Posted 9 days ago.

NasCarNut

ok then, healthcare program...smh

Posted 10 days ago.

BeRight

Nas, it is not a "program".

It is insurance.

Posted 10 days ago.

NasCarNut

how much more time, money, and energy will they waste to overturn a program for which they have nothing to replace it with??...

Posted 10 days ago.

NasCarNut

relax folks, they're not giving up yet...third times a charm ;)

Republicans in Congress are moving toward a plan to use a special budgetary process to repeal ObamaCare, after the Supreme Court ruled for a second time to uphold the controversial law.

Posted 10 days ago.

harryanderson

Of course I was being facetious. Politics should have nothing to do with Supreme Court decisions.

But it obviously does. This case follows the pattern of many others. Republican appointees vote the Republican Party line and Democratic appointees vote the Democratic Party line.

In case after case, the courts don’t decide on the basis of right and wrong. They decide on the basis of party affiliation. That makes them political tools, and their opinions should be judged in that light.

BTW: Scalia follows the party line as much as anybody. Judge his dissent accordingly

Posted 10 days ago.

Stillhere

Scalia criticized the court's interpretation, which he said "means nullifying the term 'by the State' not just once, but again and again."

He called the decision "interpretive jiggery-pokery," a "defense of the indefensible" and "pure applesauce."

And he wrote about the "somersaults of statutory interpretation" the court performed and said that "words no longer have meaning if an Exchange that is not established by a State is 'established by the State.'"

Posted 10 days ago.

BeRight

The financial news reports that the biggest winners in the SCOTUS decision are the hospitals.

They will make tons more money.

The biggest losers are the newly insured who think they will get care from a system that is already stretched.

Obamacare is not about health care, it is about insurance.

Posted 10 days ago.

Stillhere

Harry is pretending again i see. Party line has nothing to do with scotus or at least it shouldnt. Adherence to the constitution and the letter of the law is all that is required. If the law is poorly written, strike it down and make congress rewrite it in accordance with the constitution if they wish to try again. Divining intent is not the job of the scotus

Posted 10 days ago.

absolem

the extra and unexpected word at the end was a tx-exempt freebie and not required to be reported as the value falls well below the 1/100 cent valuse of most printed coupons.

Posted 10 days ago.

absolem

harryanderson...good morning. just think...it all began as not being a tax....ohhh wait...it became a tax..and a tax with exemptions and exclusions along with a myriad of modifications that allow it to be the artists canavs in which to craft a masterpiece of legislation. choice.

Posted 10 days ago.

harryanderson

John Roberts and Anthony Kennedy have betrayed the Republican Party that gave them their jobs.

Now is the perfect opportunity for Republicans to ensure that future SCOTUS appointees remain loyal to the Party.

The House should immediately bring Articles of Impeachment against Roberts. Maybe enough Democratic senators, hoping for a replacement chosen by Obama, will join the Republican senators in removing him. Then, McConnell should refuse to vote on any replacement until a Republican president gets elected.

Even if Roberts isn’t removed, future Republican appointees will understand that they WILL PAY A HEAVY PRICE if they stray from the Party line.

We must stop this ACTIVIST, LAWLESS, OUT-OF-CONTROL Supreme Court.

Posted 10 days ago.

Stillhere

Wrong NASCAR, the scotus didnt judge the actual letter of the law, they divined intent, NOT thier job

Posted 10 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or