Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
461 days ago.
by asknot
Kendall78
#1

When should a person be punished for stating an opinion?

As many people might know, 'Duck Dynasty' star Phil Robertson gave an interview to GQ Magazine and gave his colorful opinion on different social topics. The response from various groups made A&E pull him from the show. So the discussion is, if someone is asked for their opinion and gives it willingly, should they be punished afterward?

 
 

Member Comments

Kunectdots

So, since Taoism was used as the propellant for Cao Cao's rise to power in olden China, when you die, do you wish to be buried in Hallowed ground (facing East) or in a WalMart parking lot?

Posted 483 days ago.

Kunectdots

As we've seen, when it comes to Democrats being in the majority, it's "our way or the highway" (ObamaCare).

When it's Democrats in the minority it's "where is the compromise" (the present US House and individuals such as asknot).

Posted 483 days ago.

Kunectdots

asknot - I've always believed that God REALLY has to have a sense of humor. I can't help but wonder which side of our tit-for-tat He's laughing at. Mine, just trying to jerk your chain (and MAYBE wake you up) or your's, advocating the practice of men laying with men?

"Send them out, so that we might KNOW them".

Posted 483 days ago.

Kunectdots

"digging the hole"? I'm not really bent that way! I was just funning you about your mascot.

Tell us more about "digging the hole". Does K-Y really help the 'shovel' go in easier?

Posted 483 days ago.

Kunectdots

"not practicing what he preached." BINGO! An admission of sin!

Posted 483 days ago.

Kunectdots

You'll be pleased to know that a sheep or two MIGHT show up to contest the union. BUT, it's all in your s-exual proclivities, Bud. I knew I could count on your blessings.

Posted 483 days ago.

Kunectdots

So you'll be there to lend support when I marry your party's mascot, the donkey. We've been living in sin (not being married) for years now.

She insists on wearing white at the ceremony ... but I think THAT would be pushing it.

Posted 483 days ago.

Kunectdots

AHAH!, thegreek! You have hit the proverbial nail on the head. I posted very little to entice asknot to reveal such ire. The last time, I was just poking pure fun at oneill and BOOM!, asknot comes out swinging.

Such is the way of those on the Left.

Posted 483 days ago.

Kunectdots

BTW lts - Thank YOU for noticing what others here SHOULD.

Posted 483 days ago.

Kunectdots

REALLY???

I've found the "agree/disagree" availability to be rightfully constraining. EVERYTIME I've went back and reread a listing of comments, the system has flashed, "You've Already Voted", if I've forgotten that I indeed already done that and attempted to vote again.

It's proven faaaaaar more effective at legitimacy than, say, our present system of selecting a president. (SNARK!)

Posted 483 days ago.

atlas2025

"Kunect, lol, they just forced them to play smarter, but an article that has minimal "agrees" "disagrees" all day suddenly will have 10-15 in 5 minutes."

You make a valid point Asknot.

What I have found interesting is the amount of disagrees is in a lot of cases numbers more than the people commenting who would disagree with a particular post.

And the vast majority of that has been on posts that I know for a fact a right leaning person would disagree with.

Another aspect of that is that for a person to click that disagree button and have it counted they have to have an account.

So why not take the time to write up a post stating your opinion and go after those you disagree with that way?

Makes sense to me.

No what it points to is people who are buthurt trying to use the agree/disagree thing as some meaningful form of leverage over those they disagree with.

Conservatives are the only ones who have the mentality to go to such lengths.

Posted 483 days ago.

atlas2025

And for the record I had a good laugh when you pointed out that you like to save the posts on that site as some means of defending yourself from the forum boogiemen!

Posted 483 days ago.

atlas2025

" I seem to remember that you said you liked to wear crotch less panties with your pink tutu back then."

Well thats a true statement. I happen to be quite fond of the extra ventilation crotchless bloomers provide.

Especially this time of year. Nothing like a bracing breeze to put an extra little kick in ones step.

You should try it sometime. Its just so dang liberating.

Posted 483 days ago.

luvthesouth

after reading last nights exchanges...i would say the topic of this forum has been answered in spades.

Posted 483 days ago.

Kunectdots

I seem to remember that the MT webmaster cracked down on one's ability to have multiple accounts during the LilyOvalleyDickArmeyCheney days.

Sorry, boys and girls! It just been little ol' "Kunectdots", for the past four years.

assless2025, I'd be very interested in responding to ANY comment that I supposedly made on the PKB N&S site that you found conflicting with anything else I said. I seem to remember that you said you liked to wear crotch less panties with your pink tutu back then. SEE, the old baseless accusations are hard to refute (and you know it).

Posted 483 days ago.

atlas2025

Oh for christ sakes lol! Asknot just so you know Kunectdots was prone to doing the same thing on the Parkersburg News and Sentinel site.

If you find yourself getting buthurt over online comments...either man up and deal with it...or just go somewhere else!

Hey where have we heard that before?

If you dont like my true version of America then leave!

Posted 483 days ago.

Kunectdots

PS. "FREDDIE"???

Posted 483 days ago.

Kunectdots

You stated that I'm not the one that you are tweeting information about. That means, if your honestly doing it, you're tweeting out about someone else (unidentifiable, supposedly) on here. That makes you (if you are really able to do it) a threat to all concerned on here, except Fred (with the big "O" on his cape) who has a relative at this paper and thinks like you do. Those conditions make you a threat to the confidentiality that the rest of us felt was, almost, contractual here and WAS comfortable with. Thusly, I reported you for all of us (excluding Fred and Bobdahler).

Posted 483 days ago.

Kunectdots

I never watch Phil and wonder if the scandal's all a "put on" anyway. I look for their brand to come back and skyrocket, when the dust settles.

Posted 483 days ago.

Kunectdots

Yeah folks! So now we've got Facebook logging postings, that you decide better from actually posting and decide to delete. We've got Smart TVs, that are capable of watching you, without your consent, in your living room. AND, we've got ASKNOT, who claims to be able to identify you and "tweet" your friends based upon obviously acquiring your identity from a site where it is SUPPOSEDLY protected.

Oh, what a Liberal paradise we are headed toward. A little George Orwell with your hors d'oeuvres, anyone?

Posted 483 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or