Are the Second Amendment "rights" of Americans really being "threatened" - or is this complaint just another gimmick to get the right-wing, reactionary base "fired up" for 2012?

Greek ole boy , check out what your pal bewrite quoted under my last post !!Maybe if you and others of your ilk would quit citing "fox news" and the other propaganda factories we would quit tossing it back in your face !

No, beright. I have occasional confusion about many things, but not that. I am hoping you heard/ saw the whole content, and not just a "fox" snippet.

don't be so obstinate, beright. Handguns are ok with Scalia, .....military level arms are not. I offered the fox piece as a starting point.( you know, soften you up with something you find familiar and acceptable (-:} ) There are other examples of his thoughts out there, that contain well chosen wordings by the man. he leans against military style arms, and will vote that position if it comes before him.

It aint Fox news! Any idiot with half a brain can figure it out for themselves. Jeesh. Why does the left keep citing Fox news??

Theres the first problem " Fox news" ! Now thats an oxymoron !

I saw th einterview. Scalia told Fox News that the Second Amendment “undoubtedly” permits some restrictions on firearms. I specifically noted he did not use the word "banned" in his comments,

Mod, where you confused yesterday when Obama used the word “we” numerous times during his address?

beright- fox news, published 7/30/12.

All these right-wing whackos are screaming about the same thing Raygun did ! Its hilarious !

moderation , no I do not.

So . . . How are several of the sc justices leaning around this issue and what does Scalia believe?

"5 Absurd Scalia Quotes You Just Won't Believe" by Steve Williams

Scalia doesn't believe in magic,

Magic 8 Ball

beright-you do know how several of the sc justices are leaning around this issue...., don't you?

moderation: people on both sides of the issue. I favor extensive background checks and a 14 day waiting period after a positive check before a gun purchase. I do not favor limiting which guns a purchaser can buy or own. If that were the case for cars, you could pass a driving test but not be allowed to own a Corvette because they go to fast or an SUV because they casue to much damage when colliding with a smaller car.

Mod, when you know and trust your fellow hunters to treat firearms the way we were taught as kids , it's a hard thing to add folks your not sure about ! We picked up one guy and he was shooting hornets nests ! He wasnt invited back !

Yes,scrappile,how different things could have been at that show.and that example of negligence is why my hunting group has remained the same, with the exception of a couple of natural expirations, for 27 yrs.

Gun Appreciation Day: Lets appreciate the fact that 5 people were not "fatally" shot at gun shows today, only saying this as a precaution to those that want armed teachers and janitors etc., around ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS. We are humans and we crucify perfection....

I agree,I dont see the attraction either. However it is another example of the futility of any weapons ban. A person with a will to get a weapon will always find a way.

"Single or limited use?" Spending all that cash for a 3-D printer to do something you can do with sheet metal and a welder? I don't see the attraction myself.