Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
10 hours ago.
by thegreek
oneill
#1

Are the Second Amendment "rights" of Americans really being "threatened" - or is this complaint just another gimmick to get the right-wing, reactionary base "fired up" for 2012?

Well Bob, if you're not going to do it, I guess I'll have to ... Some of today's "pretend patriots" might want to look at what is happening in Egypt ... A real "revolution" isn't pretty ... Some Americans, however, are claiming that President Obama and his administration are "tyrants", and (in the words of failed Nevada Senatorial candidate Sharron Angle) "Second Amendment Solutions" might be needed ... Is she right? Or is she just "right-wing"? Inquiring minds want to know!

 
 

Member Comments

thegreek

In bible times a military assault weapon could have been way more devastating than a rifle. Pouring boiling OIL over the side of a castle onto the enemy. Roman swords were smaller and therefore could be swung faster and more frequently than standard swords. That is all I can think of now but with some research, I could show you some mideval assault weaponry that would make a rifle look like a bb gun. And they made people die a horribly slow and painful death. So Munster, the rifle isnt the 1st military assault weapon available to common citizens.

Posted 39 days ago.

thegreek

Rifles didnt exist when the bible was written. BUT Jesus did tell the disciples that if they didnt have a sword to trade their cloaks for one!! A person cannot assume that Jesus did not want people to defend themselves from evil with weapons or anything they could.

Posted 39 days ago.

Munster

Show me that in the bible where it says god grants you the right to own a military assault rifle !!! Keep on listening to your right -wing bullcrap ! They haven't been right yet !

Posted 40 days ago.

Munster meant to say . . . Yes, he is not able to see the truth for what it is and he sit around in denial.

Posted 40 days ago.

Munster

No , I am able to see the truth for what it is and not sit around in denial, there still is NO LEGITIMATE REASON for a civilian to own a military assault weapon !

Posted 40 days ago.

Munster

Yes there is ! The government doesn't allow many military weapons to get into civilian hands ! You don't like it but that's the way it is !

Posted 40 days ago.

stickhauler

Fact: There is NO legitimate reason for any law abiding to NOT own whatever style firearm that is legally available!

The only people who say otherwise are the devotees of Obama, and they choose to parrot his anti-gun tirade.

It's really sad to see people so dead set on obstructing the God given rights all Americans are assured in the Bill of Rights. Which other rights offend you yahoos? Is the First Amendment your next crusade? You're already firing your initial shots every time you criticize Fox, while approving of the tripe put out by PMSNBC!

Posted 40 days ago.

Tough Targets: When Criminals Face Armed Resistance from Citizens

By Clayton E. Cramer and David Burnett

(cato)

Posted 40 days ago.

moderation

poochurner- are you still with us?

Posted 40 days ago.

Munster

No , I am able to see the truth for what it is and not sit around in denial, there still is NO LEGITIMATE REASON for a civilian to own a military assault weapon !

Posted 40 days ago.

stickhauler

Why the word "red neck" is censored makes no sense. Frankly, to the liberal elite, that describes exactly what they think all of us out in "fly-over" country are.

Posted 40 days ago.

stickhauler

So now we're not only "gun nuts", we're also ********?

Posted 40 days ago.

Kunectdots

oneill - Why so mum? Are you actually seeing the lunacy of the Liberals shooting their wad over this issue?

Posted 40 days ago.

Kunectdots

Munster - You are aware that, in the confines of a classroom, having taken out any adult intervention, a grown man wearing steel-toed boots could kill 20 first-graders IN 5 MINUTES, aren't you?

Here's another perspective on what Lanza did and the LOGICAL EFFECT it should have on the rest of us (not counting YOU, of course).

"Did Adam Lanza Have More Ammo in His House Than An Entire Marine Squad? No" Michael O'Neil in, Politics, Guns 2 weeks ago

h ttp://w ww.policymic.c om/articles/31435/did-adam-lanza-have-more-ammo-in-his-house-than-an-entire-marine-squad-no/427389

Posted 40 days ago.

stickhauler

free, you're just a special kind of stupid, aren't you!

Posted 41 days ago.

Munster

You cant say red ne ck ???

Posted 41 days ago.

Munster

Well still no idiotic ******* gun nut needs to own a military assault weapon !

Posted 41 days ago.

stickhauler

Statistics don't matter? So we need to ban guns for no other reason than you idiot liberals are scared of them?

Posted 41 days ago.

thegreek

I would hope to think that if my loved one was killed with a gun by a MANIAC that I wouldn't give a speech about taking everyones guns !!! That is like wanting to ban cars because some drunk hit and killed her loved ones. The root problem is the PERSON, not the weapon, be it a car by the drunk or a gun by the psychopath !! The real answer is to not let anyone that is a psycho own a weapon !!! Just like we dont allow drunks to drive when they are caught!!

Posted 41 days ago.

Munster

As I've stated , statistics dont matter ! And the good book say to turn the other cheek ! Regardless of all your turning and twisting you will keep your second amendment rights and there still is no legitimate reason for a civilian to own a assault weapon ! Theres the truth of the matter and all your whinning wont change the FACT !!!!!

Posted 41 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or