| Latest Post: Started By: Rank: Category Are the Second Amendment "rights" of Americans really being "threatened" - or is this complaint just another gimmick to get the right-wing, reactionary base "fired up" for 2012?Well Bob, if you're not going to do it, I guess I'll have to ... Some of today's "pretend patriots" might want to look at what is happening in Egypt ... A real "revolution" isn't pretty ... Some Americans, however, are claiming that President Obama and his administration are "tyrants", and (in the words of failed Nevada Senatorial candidate Sharron Angle) "Second Amendment Solutions" might be needed ... Is she right? Or is she just "right-wing"? Inquiring minds want to know! Member CommentsBeRightIn regards to weapon bans, assault and otherwiase When will Harry Reid start the gun control debate in the Senate? When will he call for a vote in the Senate? Why are so many Senators, including Al Franken, unwilling to take a stand on gun control? Who are the Cowards on this issue? Looks to me it is the ones on the left. Posted 90 days ago. stickhaulerI joined the Army! They let me use an AR-15 that WOULD shoot full auto. Then, when I bought my civilian clone of an AR rifle, our government trusted me well enough to allow me to buy it. But now, because of your demand that "no civilian" needs to own such a rifle, you really think that means anything to me? Afraid not, Bubba! Posted 90 days ago. thegreekIt is called standing up for my beliefs and proving my case with conviction. Something that you have failed to do. All you do is declare that no one needs these items.!! Posted 90 days ago. MunsterThe greek does everything he can to deflect and deny ! No One Needs an assault weapon ! Posted 90 days ago. BeRightWhen will Harry Reid start the gun control debate in the Senate? When will he call for a vote in the Senate? Why are so many Senators, including Al Franken, unwilling to take a stand on gun control? Who are the Cowards on this issue? Looks to me it is the ones on the left. Posted 90 days ago. thegreekKING MUNSTER DECLARES NO ONE NEEDS AN A.R. Passing judgement again. You wanna eat candy and pop, join an EXERCISE CLUB...That is my declaration.!!! Posted 90 days ago. MunsterOne new regulation restricting the ownership of assault weapons ! Posted 90 days ago. MunsterThere is NO COPPING OUT and your the one that cant defend a simple premise ! NO ONE NEEDS AN ASSAULT RIFLE ! PERIOD !Its pretty simple , there isnt any gun ban , you'll keep your shotguns etc ! But assault rifles will stay where they belong ,in the military ! If you want to play with one then join the army ! Posted 90 days ago. thegreekNooo. You can't get off that easy. !! Making a big stand then copping out when you are getting beaten. Unless you just saw the bandwagon of banning guns go by and decided to jump on it for no reason. The only answer to this madness of abusing guns is to enforce the laws we have now. Dealing with the overcrowded prison population and not releasing habitual violent crimminals back onto the street because there is no money to keep them. Not making new laws that we cannot afford to enforse so politicians will have their place in history. Posted 90 days ago. MunsterTiredbrain , If I'm not very bright then tell the greek all about how you cant buy an AK-47 ! I guess this not very bright person is still brighter than you ! And greek I'm noit going through that crap again like I did with ole numbnuts , theres a difference and you know it so figure it out yourself ! You might get it , but if your as dense as tirebrain ...well....! Posted 90 days ago. thegreekThere are many reasons that civilians use assault rifles. Self defense, hunting coyotes, feral hogs (there are millions of them in Texas ruining crops and land) target practice. You can use an assault rifle for the same purposes as you would a hunting rifle. Which by the way is why people like them. Posted 91 days ago. TiredofitDont count on much of an answer from Munster, he just isnt that bright. He seems to think if you repeat a lie long enough it will somehow become true. Posted 91 days ago. thegreekAnd a sword can do more damage to the human body in the same amount of time as an assault rifle. Invalid point !! Posted 91 days ago. thegreekOK smarty pants Judge Munster. Explain the difference between an assault and a hunting rifle of the exact same caliber. I bet half of the people that want them banned (yes your trying to take my rights from me, I don't care how you dice it) do not have a clue what the difference is, between an assault rifle and a hunting rifle. I will be waiting. You are not allowed to search the internet for an answer either. And yes, there are people that collect rocket launchers, tanks, flamethrowers. And yes, you are acting like everyones judge and jury. Posted 91 days ago. MunsterNo body is taking your rights away thats just stupid ! And I'm not the judge dum-dum ! Look , the goverment says you cant have a grenade launcher or a B-52 either but I dont hear you whinning about that ! Its common sense , no civilian needs a weapon thats designed to do as much damage to a human body as possible ! Common sense , you might not understand that so look it up ! Posted 91 days ago. thegreekOK Judge Munster. I said PROGRESSIVE ego. Can't you read ??? I am not the one that is agressively trying to take your rights from you. Maybe she doesan't like the kick of a shotgun !!! Maybe she has preferences that do not align with yours. You know there are people out there that are that way. What would happen if you told a homosexual or lesbian that you have JUDGED them to not need to follow their preferences. That in YOUR superior and higher opinion, you judged they are fine being heterosexual. You would be ostracised but it is OK to say it to progun owners. Posted 91 days ago. MunsterAnd dum-dum , if she would have had a 12 gauge full of buckshot it would have worked just fine ! Posted 91 days ago. Post a Comment |