Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
5 hours ago.
by Ohwiseone
BeRight
#1

CLEAN... ENERGY

Offshore wind farms from New Jersey to Virginia took a big step closer to reality with the completion of a review that showed the renewable energy source would not cause major environmental damage, officials said today. Wind projects off the coasts of Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, and New Jersey are being studied. The Mid-Atlantic lease proposal follows the Cape Wind project in Massachusetts that was given the go-ahead in 2010 after 9 years of federal review."No developer should have to wait nine or 10 years," for approval, Salazar said. The response from the developers was "DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

The energy industry is a whole different ball of wax from the pollution issue. There is so much that goes into the pricing of fuel/energy and the Govt regulations are just a piece of it.

Posted 54 days ago.

BeRight

I remember now: The Bloom Box Energy

Posted 54 days ago.

BeRight

Kendall78: I watched a 60 minutes thing a few years ago where thy interviewed a guy that developed something in a box that was almost pollution free technology and supposedly has installed one at Google and some other places around silicon valley. What ever happened to that?

Posted 54 days ago.

BeRight

Electricity will become expensive. I feel sorry for those on fixed income. Soon it will also be me.

Posted 54 days ago.

BeRight

The problem with Coal is the feds. The Feds have made the pollution goals a moving target. First it was SO2. Check.

Then it was Mercury. Check.

Now the Feds have finally found one that can’t be done and that is CO2. Check and Mate.

Posted 54 days ago.

Kendall78

When you mean solar power...be specific.

Also, that is why we invest money into development of new tech. Only fools and cowards give up when it gets tough.

Posted 54 days ago.

thegreek

YOU IDIOT - I am not talking about the sun I am talking about solar POWER !!! There are no developed technologies available as of yet that can efficiently harness the sun in the amount of SUSTAINABLE MEGA WATTS that we/you DEMAND in this country. Again - you should refrain from discussing topics you are in ignorance of such as this one !!

Posted 54 days ago.

Kendall78

"The point about renewables is there is NO sustainability in them like there is coal or nukes."

Sadly you are quite wrong. The Sun will far outlast any coal supply. Nuclear power would last a long time but of course there are side effects to that tech.

You might want to pause your emotional filled rant and realize that I have never said we should get rid of coal and any of it. I am for using it more efficiently and develop alternative power sources.

You have to admit, if we can develop better working hyrdo, solar and wind power tech that we wouldn't have to rely on other nations as much for fossil fuels.

Posted 54 days ago.

thegreek

You think !!???? NO - I think Gore and these liberal professors are lying.. The point about renewables is there is NO sustainability in them like there is coal or nukes. When the wind does NOT blow - guess what - it is usually hotter than blazes. And when the sun don't shine - it is colder than Alaska !! You cannot get around that fact. There will need to be coal, gas and nukes if you want to type on that computer. You treehuggers are so freaking stupid about electricity !!

Posted 54 days ago.

Kendall78

I never claimed that anything Gore said was fact or fiction. I was just pointing out that the video had numerous flaws in it. I think you agree that it did.

Posted 55 days ago.

thegreek

It is no worse than the crappola that lying Al Gore was spreading with his "Inconvenient Untruths" that by the way are not based on facts !!!

Posted 55 days ago.

Kendall78

It's a pitiful video greek. Real science isn't about trying to say what is good or evil. That one scientist at the end tries to make it out that way. There is fact or falsehood. None of those scientists offered any real evidence for their pov. They rely on the lack of knowledge to be their evidence.

Posted 55 days ago.

Kendall78

6. The video says that the Sun doesn't always shine and the wind doesn't always blow. Oy vey. I think the Sun shines a bit more quickly and wind blows a bit more than new sources of coal and oil are produced.

7. Then of course they have to go down the crazy by wondering what would happen if we quit using oil LIKE RIGHT NOW! Of course, no one has suggested that we quit using oil fully. It's only been suggested that we find other sources to slowly replace the finite energy source we call fossil fuels.

Posted 55 days ago.

Kendall78

3. They constantly confuse theorizing with claiming something to be fact. When a scientist puts up the theory that natural phenomenon can be effected by man-made climate change...that's what it is..a theory. They need to learn the difference.

4. They mock that a prediction that the ice caps would be totally gone but yet ignore the fact that the ice caps have shrunk.

5. And of course the video slides into politics by sloppily trying to divide the issue into Left Vs Right fight.

Posted 55 days ago.

Kendall78

Some problems with the video:

1. The claim of no rising temps. They ignore that the ocean temps are rising. They ignore that the past 18 years are hotter than the 18 years that came before it. The problem still exist.

2. I love the claim the narrator makes about the idea that the temp rise has not been widely publicized. Guess they don't listen to their own nutjobs very much. The reason you won't hear real scientists involved in climate change talk about is that surface temps being "flat" doesn't mean that global warming as a whole isn't happening.

Posted 55 days ago.

thegreek

ht tp ://w w w.teapartycrusaders. com / international-news/global-warming-hoax-basics/

Great little 4 minute video on the climate change scandal.

Posted 55 days ago.

thegreek

UNaffordable energy is definitely clean !

Posted 117 days ago.

BeRight

What about China?

Posted 118 days ago.

BeRight

U.S. energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in 2013 were 10 percent lower than 2005 levels, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Between 2005 and 2011, all four Census regions – West, South, Midwest and Northeast – had declines in emissions, with the Northeast experiencing the largest reduction. At the state level, Nebraska had a 20 percent emissions increase while Nevada showed a 33 percent decrease. The Midwest, West and South regions have more diverse state-level characteristics, which contributed to slower net emissions declines compared to the Northeast.

Posted 118 days ago.

BeRight

This should help all those on fixed incomes in the USA:

Electricity prices are probably on their way up across much of the U.S. as coal-fired plants, the dominant source of cheap power, shut down in response to environmental regulations and economic forces. The Energy Department predicts retail power prices will rise 4 percent on average this year, the biggest jump since 2008. By 2020, prices are expected to climb an additional 13 percent, a forecast that does not include the costs of coming environmental rules.

WOW! NEVER SAW THAT ONE COMING! lol

Posted 132 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or