Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
2 days ago.
by Ohwiseone
BeRight
#1

CLEAN... ENERGY

Offshore wind farms from New Jersey to Virginia took a big step closer to reality with the completion of a review that showed the renewable energy source would not cause major environmental damage, officials said today. Wind projects off the coasts of Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, and New Jersey are being studied. The Mid-Atlantic lease proposal follows the Cape Wind project in Massachusetts that was given the go-ahead in 2010 after 9 years of federal review."No developer should have to wait nine or 10 years," for approval, Salazar said. The response from the developers was "DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"

 
 

Member Comments

Ohwiseone

Do you suppose those that built our current (no pun intended) power grid did so with no thought as to how they would recoup their costs !

Posted 10 days ago.

absolem

A viable solution has to be cost effective or so necessary that cost is no object...fiat cash should cover it. Actually it would be interesting to actually match the need with the cost and method (s) required to equal or offer reduced cost. A municipality of roughly 15,000 would be a beaker size example of the challenge.

Posted 12 days ago.

moderation

I think the cost is already quite apparent,don't you?

Posted 12 days ago.

absolem

OWO..good morning. Have you started crunching those green numbers yet?

Posted 12 days ago.

absolem

OWO...i also agree that the cost would be astronomical and someone has to pay. if it were mandated and the energy companies had first dibs...so to speak, then i would prefer that route. it gives them a way to change the flow of revenue while maintaining service. additionally, the government would need to be invested without choice. aquisition of property as well as placating the American public for the eventual discourse to ensue.

Posted 13 days ago.

absolem

OWO....thanks for your thoughtful reply. perhaps an exercise to check for viability on a small scale would give one an appreciation for the task at hand of going "Green". maybe using marietta as an example of figuring out the cost to go "green".

Posted 13 days ago.

absolem

hi Kendall....long time no write. it appears from the article you lifted the story from we should be happy that they did not develop their main interest which unfortunately had a bit too much of the CO2 gas. it would be of interest to see whom was invested in exxon/mobil at the time politically and monetarily to get the full picture of the intent behind the actions.

Posted 13 days ago.

Kendall78

Exxon knew about how their industry were effecting the climate back in 1981 but then spent millions to deny it.

Guess it is all about the cash and not about facts.

Posted 13 days ago.

Ohwiseone

I think solar , wind and thermal all look promising ! First we have to update our aging transmission system ! Gonna cost us , one way or the other !

Posted 14 days ago.

absolem

OWO...let's move past the coal plants and look at the real needs in terms of consumption verses the "clean" methods in which to provide for our demand now and in the future. balancing regional needs and resources will be the key as well as efficient distribution. i would hope that somewhere in the deep dark reccesses of the Department of Energy there exists just the plan for clean fuel to either work or not....that of course depending on any recent innovations or change in resource(s). my question to you is what do you think would be the "way" to go? there is no realright or wrong...but more a work or won't work. the real problem after solving the generation and distribution issues is to sell the inevitable changes to the surrounding and environment that would have to occur. naturally politics will screw it up for several decades and then it is back to square one with a new set of issues.

Posted 14 days ago.

Ohwiseone

I have no idea of our energy needs abby but the fact remains , these old power plants were due to be shut down some years ago and only when our government found that they could make money selling " pollution credits" were they allowed to continue ! Time just ran out on them and eventually these employees were going to have to find other means for their livelihood !

Posted 15 days ago.

absolem

Moderation..good afternoon my friend. yes indeedy! i am up for the foreseeable future. enjoying my first cup of coffee for the day. taking a few before setting forth to run a few errands with the "pretty " one between us. i hope you are well. * pointing...correction from my previous post.

Posted 16 days ago.

moderation

Does this indicate you are are up for rest of the day?

Posted 16 days ago.

absolem

Moderation....your post begets the question of "who or what drives our culture to be militant"? ah...the breeze of the wagging poiting fingers of guilt does tend to create a breeze which is a relief from the oppressive heat. wag away fellas.

Posted 16 days ago.

moderation

too

Posted 16 days ago.

moderation

As would I,but our culture is much to militant, even now.

Posted 16 days ago.

absolem

True enough Stillhere. There are many causes that can be blamed for anything....including that big burning ball of hydrogen and helium.

Posted 17 days ago.

absolem

Instead of it being a chance of revolution....I would hope for innovation instead.

Posted 17 days ago.

moderation

A seventy year mini ice age would challenge our species to the max.I am sure it would give birth to an earth wide revolution.

Posted 17 days ago.

Stillhere

Absolem, you are a heretic, the only thing that affects climate is money. Don't come around here spreading your denial hatred and blaming that giant ball of heat, its 93 million miles away after all.

Posted 17 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or