Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
13 days ago.
by absolem
BeRight
#1

CLEAN... ENERGY

Offshore wind farms from New Jersey to Virginia took a big step closer to reality with the completion of a review that showed the renewable energy source would not cause major environmental damage, officials said today. Wind projects off the coasts of Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, and New Jersey are being studied. The Mid-Atlantic lease proposal follows the Cape Wind project in Massachusetts that was given the go-ahead in 2010 after 9 years of federal review."No developer should have to wait nine or 10 years," for approval, Salazar said. The response from the developers was "DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"

 
 

Member Comments

BeRight

Posted 123 days ago.

Stillhere

Mod with decent bio security I don't think operations such as ours are in much danger

Posted 123 days ago.

moderation

br-does that imply a disbelief in a relationship between quakes and fracking?

Posted 123 days ago.

Teapartier

Nepal is in the Ring of Fire ...

Posted 124 days ago.

absolem

Valveguy...it's an interesting endeavor. from the little i have read, it will supply power to a population of 200,000. unlike nuclear vessels, these power plants are not self-propelled. i really need to look into it further.

Posted 124 days ago.

BeRight

Do they Frack in Nepal?

Posted 124 days ago.

moderation

Yes I did see that.I'm filling the incubator as I post. Seriously though, it is a bummer, and we could be infected at some point

Posted 124 days ago.

Stillhere

Off topic: Mod did you see where they had to kill some 4 million layers in the Midwest? We are gonna be rich we chicken farmers ;)

Posted 124 days ago.

moderation

That is a horror story, beright.

Posted 124 days ago.

BeRight

Mike and Chantell Sackett

Posted 125 days ago.

BeRight

"land grab"

Posted 125 days ago.

BeRight

"wetlands"

Posted 125 days ago.

BeRight

“WOTUS”

Posted 125 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Some will put teeth in the EPA and carry on their timeline for protecting our environment , what you all are so want to forget is sometimes this causes the powers that be some of their pollution swag ! Theres the reason for the republiduds crying , they must protect their wealthy benefactors !

Posted 125 days ago.

moderation

They should treat the water.

Posted 125 days ago.

absolem

TP....you are correct on all points. OWO..is the homely cheerleader for the state of denial. He conveniently does not hear the grand poohba when he proudly says..."I have directed the blah, blah, blah department to do so and so. Discussions devolve very quickly into a sad Ed Schultz routine for him.

Posted 125 days ago.

Teapartier

OWO. Did you pay any attention to Obamas campaign platform where he vowed to empower the EPA. Or are you a typical democratic zombie living in ignorant Bliss ?? Oh. Sorry. Stupid question.

Posted 126 days ago.

Ohwiseone

As soon as Obama took the oath of office the republiduds started with this "Obamas EPA" crap ! Reality is the EPA is just what the name says it is ! Just because sometimes the EPAs rulings make it less profitable for the wealthy , the republiduds decided to make it one of their new whipping boys !And swallowing that particular line-o-crap is just one way that shows ones indoctrination !

Posted 126 days ago.

Valveguy

Raise you hand if you think this is a good idea: Russia says it will complete the world’s first floating nuclear power plant by 2016.

Construction began in 2007 on the floating station, called the Akademik Lomonosov, but the project has not yet become fully operational after several delays. The project consists of a 70-MW nuclear power plant in the hull of the ship Akademik Lomonosov.

Posted 126 days ago.

absolem

OWO...consider the context of "Obama's EPA". the administration seems to direct the epa in initiatives all of the time. lesten back to the presidents own words...so in essence it is his EPA. you or i can't strongly recommend to any federal agency that would come close having the weight of the President. this isn't political..it is just how it is.

Posted 128 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or