Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
5 days ago.
by Bigfoot
BeRight
#1

CLEAN... ENERGY

Offshore wind farms from New Jersey to Virginia took a big step closer to reality with the completion of a review that showed the renewable energy source would not cause major environmental damage, officials said today. Wind projects off the coasts of Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, and New Jersey are being studied. The Mid-Atlantic lease proposal follows the Cape Wind project in Massachusetts that was given the go-ahead in 2010 after 9 years of federal review."No developer should have to wait nine or 10 years," for approval, Salazar said. The response from the developers was "DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"

 
 

Member Comments

BeRight

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) this June is expected to release final rules covering water intake structures at existing power plants and large manufacturing facilities in an effort to address injury and mortality among aquatic life that can become trapped on water intake equipment (impinged) or sucked into the plant itself (entrained). Jeezzzzzzzzzzzzz. Kill birds with Wind turbines but save the fish?

Posted 443 days ago.

BeRight

*

Posted 446 days ago.

BeRight

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) this June is expected to release final rules covering water intake structures at existing power plants and large manufacturing facilities in an effort to address injury and mortality among aquatic life that can become trapped on water intake equipment (impinged) or sucked into the plant itself (entrained). Jeezzzzzzzzzzzzz. Kill birds with Wind turbines but save the fish?

Posted 447 days ago.

BeRight

Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman signed off on TransCanada’s revised route through his state earlier this week, effectively clearing what the Obama administration has cited as a major hurdle to green-lighting the entire Keystone XL pipeline. A letter signed by 53 senators said Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman’s approval of a revised route through his state puts the long-delayed project squarely in the president’s hands. After years of federal review, there was little question last year that construction of the pipeline, which would transport heavy, oil-like bitumen from Alberta to the Gulf of Mexico coast, should proceed.

Posted 455 days ago.

BeRight

Mod, where you confused yesterday when Obama used the word “we” numerous times during his address?

Posted 457 days ago.

Tiredofit

More Climate change nonsense (formally Global Warming). This is YET another grab for power by the socialists of the world. Ever hear of the ICE AGE MORONS??? how did we exit the ice age? Was it my SUV??? Such lemmings. The Govt will protect you from the boogie man if you send them more money and give up your rights. REALLY they will.

Posted 457 days ago.

BeRight

The National Nuclear Security Administration, under the Department of Energy, contracted Siemens Government Technologies Inc. to construct and operate the planned 11.5 MW Pantex wind farm, said to be the U.S. government’s largest wind farm. Hundreds of thousands of migratory birds are expected to die as a result.

Posted 457 days ago.

BeRight

Mod, you are such a bore sometimes: "If the US Gov’t were serious about global warming (and the US GOV’t is not) the USA would ban the export of coal. Coal Companies in the USA are mining just as much coal as before the only difference is that someone other than USA power companies are burning it. If it a global problem the USA should stop feeding the global beast."

Posted 457 days ago.

moderation

BeRight said- "If we were serious about global warming (and we are not) we would stop the export of coal. We are mining just as much coal as before the only difference is that someone else is burning it. If it a global problem we should stop feeding the global beast." again, beright, will you please define your use of the term,"we" " ?

Posted 457 days ago.

BeRight

If we were serious about global warming (and we are not) we would stop the export of coal. We are mining just as much coal as before the only difference is that someone else is burning it. If it a global problem we should stop feeding the global beast.

Posted 458 days ago.

BeRight

If we were serious about global warming (and we are not) we would stop the export of coal. We are mining just as much coal as before the only difference is that someone else is burning it. If it a global problem we should stop feeding the global beast.

Posted 468 days ago.

BeRight

Canada has accepted the possiblity of power shortages. Will we?

Posted 468 days ago.

BeRight

The last of Ontario’s coal-fired power plants are scheduled to close by the end of 2013, a year earlier than the government originally planned. According to the Toronto Star, the remaining operating units are four units at Ontario Power Generation (OPG)’s 2,760 MW Nanticoke Generating Station and two units at the Lambton plant. A coal-burning generator at the 211 MW Atikokan is being converted to burn biomass, and a project to convert a 300 MW coal plant at Thunder Bay was suspended in November 2012. OPG said it will continue exploring repowering options for Thunder Bay. The Ontario government announced in 2010 that all coal-fired generation in the province would be shut down by Dec. 31, 2014. Ontario concluded that power shortages are an acceptable risk for the good of the environment.

Posted 468 days ago.

BeRight

A settlement reached with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Justice to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Air Act will require Wisconsin Public Service (WPS) to invest about $300 million in pollution control technology, pay a civil penalty of $1.2 million, and spend $6 million on environmental mitigation projects.

WPS will raise their rates to customers to cover the penalties.

Posted 469 days ago.

BeRight

Leaders of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Friday called on the Department of the Interior to investigate whether coal companies are understating the value of coal mined on federal and tribal lands to avoid paying full royalties. The committee's new chairman, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), and ranking member Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Ala.) in a bipartisan letter cited a Dec. 4 Reuters report that alleged coal producers are valuing coal mined at low domestic prices, selling that coal to affiliated trading firms at those prices to avoid paying royalties, and then selling the coal overseas at a much higher price, which is not always reflected in royalty payments. Let me see ….So I guess we don’t want to burn coal but we want to keep mining it and ship it overseas so someone else burns it and we still make money.

Posted 469 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or