Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
1 hour ago.
by slinky
rocker
#1

Daily breaking news and news the liberal media doesn't want you to know, won't report, or just daily news issues.

Americans for many years have had to rely on left leaning biased news reporting from liberal media such as NBC, ABC, and CBS and the New York Times. As most of these outlets struggle to remain on the air and in print, the new media is flourishing and people are hearing both sides of the issues. This forum will provide people with a place to discuss daily news issues of any kind or discuss articles not printed or aired by the liberal news outlets.

 
 

Member Comments

harryanderson

By refusing to clarify, you leave us free to conclude citizens, in your opinion, should have arms "parity" with the military. Of course, that has to include the deadliest weapons the military has.

Posted 65 days ago.

harryanderson

Shopsteward,you asked for the purpose of an armed citizenry.

According to the second amendment, it's because a well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state.

There. Now, I've answered your question, even though you stuck your tail between your legs and scampered from my invitation to clarify your statement.

Posted 65 days ago.

Shopsteward

Funny they never scream racism when they GET something due to race or gender, they forget they are taking it away from someone else who isnt that color or gender

Posted 65 days ago.

Coaluser

des pi se

Posted 65 days ago.

Coaluser

Mith Perry... BIG LOL.. She went the same route as Ms O Brien on CNN. What was her name Sinead? She was pushing liberal crap too hard also. People des***** MHP.

Posted 65 days ago.

Yes , just what is their purpose ?

Posted 65 days ago.

Technically it says you have the right to keep and bear arms so keeping isnt the issue but bearing certain arms is impossible ! So there in lay the nexus that can exploited !

Posted 65 days ago.

Shopsteward

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN:

“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.”

Posted 65 days ago.

Shopsteward

Harry what is the purpose of an armed citizenry?

Posted 65 days ago.

harryanderson

Shopsteward, you wrote, :its clear that parody was desired between govt and the people, hence military arms are absolutely part of it."

Are you saying that any arms available to the military should be available to us?

Posted 65 days ago.

Shopsteward

"I will not be used as a tool for their purposes," Harris-Perry wrote in an email to colleagues, The New York Times reported. "I am not a token, mammy or little brown bobble head."

I think Mith Perry figured out how she got the job

Posted 65 days ago.

Shopsteward

Melitha Harith Perry was fired from MSNBC causing folks to ask why MSNBC is so white? mth Perry sent an email to colleages blaming............... Wait for it................racism

Posted 65 days ago.

Coaluser

"Illegal Aliens Received 750 MILLIOB Dollars From ObamaCare" NICE... It cannot be recovered.... DOESNT THE BEST (HAA HAA) AND MOST FANTABULOUS (HEE HEE) PRESIDENT IN US HISTORY CARE ABOUT THIS???? obviously NOT...

Posted 65 days ago.

Shopsteward

It isnt now not was it ever a matter of "need"

Posted 65 days ago.

Shopsteward

Quite right Absolem, and its clear that parody was desired between govt and the people, hence military arms are absolutely part of it. So the grossly uninformed who claim no one "needs" an AR 15 clearly dont understand the founders, the constitution, or firearms

Posted 65 days ago.

absolem

OWO...the wording would have to apply to the government as well if one considers the "intent" of the second amendment. the fear and need was to equalize the balance of power between the citizens and their elected government. i agree that common sense limits must be agreed upon but mostly, active enforcement with extremely harsh penalties must be implemented. harsh penalties up to and including threat of removal has to be strongly considered. when laws become merely suggestions, then the victims will contiue to increase along with the proliferation of the problem.

Posted 65 days ago.

I still have a feeling that the proof is in the wording . If you cant "bear" a firearm then you cant have it ! That should at least limit things a bit !

Posted 65 days ago.

Ah but Abby , the "slow and methodical approach " has to at least get started . If it never moves then what do we have . Dont get me wrong , I am a strong supporter of gun rights but there has to come a time when we all say , enough is enough !

Posted 65 days ago.

absolem

Moderation... O.K.

Posted 65 days ago.

absolem

OWO.....i hope you realize that i posted what i did to show that the primary purpose of the 2nd amendment had nothing to do with hunting or other such lame limitations placed on a right that is guranteed. with that said..****mon sense and safe public interaction require certain concessions to be made. the reasons for the changes and adaptations of the amendment are evolving as generations become separated from the sting of "true" governmental tyranny. time is not the enemy of the socially slow acting poison that errodes freedom. for many instant gratification is paramount and to others the slow and methodical approach provides gratification.

Posted 65 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or