Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
130 days ago.
by slinky
armycorp
#1

Benghazi

Nothing seems to add up in this Ambassador Stevens murder. Orders to stand down. Poor security on 911. Could Stevens have been sacrified as an eye for an eye for taking out Bin Laden with the Muslim radicals? What do you think?

 
 

Member Comments

You know full well what your "news service" is all about and it seems that their outrage /scanfal "journalism is going gangbusters , especially when you consider they fib or mis-lead almost 60% of the time . Now I'll take into account the numbers MAY be a little off so lets just say they only lie 30% of the time . Thats not very credible ! Now I know this story is from Reuters , but its where these people run with it !

Posted 256 days ago.

absolem

i am not seeking scandal as much as you are failing miserably to deflect from her lack of integrity.....i am simply reporting that she did not uphold a signed agreement with the President. her appointment was contingent on her signing the form. do you disagree with that fact?

Posted 256 days ago.

Again .... perspective ! You seek scandal and outrage and you'll find it come heck or high water !

Posted 256 days ago.

absolem

it is only non-binding in the respect that the agreement was not enforced by the administration. do you really think they had her sign it for the sheeer fun of it? are you that stupid?????? i'll give you a while to think on that one. if you need help...ask Shop...he will answer for you.

Posted 256 days ago.

non-binding agreement , you said it yourself !

Posted 256 days ago.

absolem

"considered redundant" ...yes you are. she signed an agreement with your Presidents administration in order to accept the position of S.O.S. and she violated that agreement. there is no doubt about it. criminal or not. if she will not even honor a non-binding agreement then what do you expect to get when she takes the oath of president? will she have her chubby little fingers crossed or will an assistant do it for her? i gave you a reputable source for the information and rather than say...hey you are right...she did not live up to her signed agreement...you instead offer up a defense for something she failed to uphold. if she wins...you of all people deserve her and all that comes with it. what is funny is that "you" folks don't accept what is proven. why don't you do the leg work and prove reuters wrong rather than whip up a bunch of non-sensical excuses for the sorry piece of work she is.

Posted 256 days ago.

Clinton Health Access Initiative , sounds pretty innocuous , were these entities poor countries seeking better health care . See whats funny is you folks zero in on any and all oddities and seek scandal, and I get that its what youre used to getting by watching and listening to your right-wing crappola ! But so far aint nothing stuck to that wall you all.20 years and counting , just seems to make the hatred hotter !

Posted 256 days ago.

Is it a criminal offence ? Or a Oversight ? Or just something considered redundant ?

Posted 256 days ago.

absolem

had been submitted to the State Department for review.

again from the same article.

Posted 256 days ago.

absolem

The Reuters inquiries also raised questions about a second assurance Hillary Clinton made to the Obama administration: that the State Department would be able to review any new or increased contributions to CHAI by foreign governments while she served as the nation's top diplomat. The Clintons said the pledge was intended to defuse accusations that foreign governments might use such donations to earn favors.

By the time Clinton left office in February 2013, the charity had received millions of dollars (Graphic: reut.rs/1Lvua8z) in new or increased payments from at least seven foreign governments. Five of the governments came on board during her tenure as secretary of state while two doubled or tripled their support in that time, according to data provided by CHAI spokeswoman Daley.

The State Department said it was unable to cite any instances of its officials reviewing or approving new money from any foreign governments. Daley confirmed that none of the seven government donations

Posted 256 days ago.

absolem

CHAI was spun off as a separate legal entity that year, but the officials acknowledged it still remains subject to the same disclosure agreement as the foundation.

Read more at Reuters***********reuters****/article/2015/03/19/us-usa-clinton-donations-idUSKBN0MF2FQ20150319#GtuyDdFA48M8mvcE.99

Posted 256 days ago.

absolem

from Reuters news agency as well a MSNBC:

In 2008, Hillary Clinton promised Barack Obama, the president-elect, there would be no mystery about who was giving money to her family's globe-circling charities. She made a pledge to publish all the donors on an annual basis to ease concerns that as secretary of state she could be vulnerable to accusations of foreign influence.

At the outset, the Clinton Foundation did indeed publish what they said was a complete list of the names of more than 200,000 donors and has continued to update it. But in a breach of the pledge, the charity's flagship health program, which spends more than all of the other foundation initiatives put together, stopped making the annual disclosure in 2010, Reuters has found.

In response to questions from Reuters, officials at the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) and the foundation confirmed no complete list of donors to the Clintons' charities has been published since 2010. CHAI was spun off as a separat

Posted 256 days ago.

And just where is this little nugget from abby ?

Posted 256 days ago.

NasCarNut

trump knows what a stunner is...and there wasn't a hair out of place LOL...

Posted 257 days ago.

absolem

OWO...Hillary failed to live up to a signed agreement to release the list of donars to her and bills foundation as a condition of being appointed secretary of state. she did not honor that agreement. can she really be so careless to willy-nilly sign andthen snub her obligations? it appears she is...and you trust her with the nuclear codes? oooopsie's all over the place.

Posted 257 days ago.

I learned long ago to stay away from you republicants perverted web sites , thank you very much . But you go ahead and gobble that crap up to your hearts desire , it fits with your personality !

Posted 257 days ago.

Coaluser

Clarification.. Look up wrestling stunner.

Posted 257 days ago.

Coaluser

Slinky. Please give yourself a "stunner".. Look that one up...

Posted 257 days ago.

Just more trumped up crappola abby !

Posted 257 days ago.

absolem

OWO...it appears as if "H.R. Puff-n-Stuff Clinton did indeed sign aa form requiring her to adhere to many stipulations regarding revealing information in which it has been revealed that she has violated. Clinton and her particular brand of politics is not what i care for in the White House. it is unfortunate that many, we are being told, do.

Posted 257 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or