Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
3 hours ago.
by Caspiansynn
Caspiansynn
#1

Winds of revolution?

Has anyone else noticed that not only the rhetoric but general conversation has changed for the worse since the Newtown shooting? There have always been some crazy ideas coming from the extreme left and right but lately I've noticed that insanity seems to be infecting average citizens as well. People every where are talking rebellion, in bars, restaurants, shoping centers, online news sites, chat rooms, fitness clubs, the list could go on forever. From my observations it appears that the people are angry about health care, taxes, the economy, but mostly its gun rights and all the talk of restrictions and confiscation by the elected officals. Could an attack on the second amendment be the catalist that could launch this great nation into an armed rebellion?

 
 

Member Comments

Caspiansynn

A Ruger M 77 also comes in 223 and you can also get one in black, I have even seen some adapted to a detachable mag. So is it the semi auto part that bothers you?

Posted 3 hours ago.

Caspiansynn

A 223 is a 22 cal bullet. Yes a 22 Hornet will work almost as well at 400 but they cost 2 times as much to shoot and when you add in the barrel burnout factor that a 22 Hornet has you can expect it to have around half the round count life of a 223.

Posted 3 hours ago.

moderation

When you consider the damage that round can do, and combine a high capacity mag,you can eliminate a threat pronto.

Posted 4 hours ago.

moderation

John Wayne wasn't that good of a shot,was he slinky?(;

Posted 4 hours ago.

You see theres the difference , ones a hunting rifle and one was made to kill people !

Posted 7 hours ago.

A 22 AR No , not out to 400 yds ! A 223 AR yeah , but that could just as well been a Ruger 77 . Do you see the difference ? I got a real nice Model 77 in 22 hornet that would get it done and it isnt a military assault weapon or one of its varietys !

Posted 7 hours ago.

Caspiansynn

Not any more, I used to raise Half-Runners for extra cash but I just don't have the time anymore.

Posted 8 hours ago.

Caspiansynn

Not any more, I used to raise Half-Runners for extra cash but I just don't have the time anymore.

Posted 8 hours ago.

moderation

There are chemical markers.

Posted 8 hours ago.

moderation

You must have a hellava big garden.

Posted 8 hours ago.

Caspiansynn

I haven't seen any markers in the fertilizer but I did notice the price is a lot higher and I have to sign for it now. I'm not sure how this would deter someone who is determined to break the law but it sure did put a dent in my gardening.

Posted 8 hours ago.

Caspiansynn

Posted 8 hours ago.

moderation

But we did tighten the accessibility to fertilizer, and include markers so purchasers could be identified. Ban rental trucks....?

Posted 8 hours ago.

Caspiansynn

But of course you are not talking about an AR because they are not military , right.

Posted 8 hours ago.

Caspiansynn

Can I down a groundhog down a 4oo meters with a 12 gauge? No, but my 22cal AR can.

Posted 8 hours ago.

Face facts ! No civilian needs a military assault weapon ! So why make them available to those who would use them to murder innocents ! You can defend your home just fine with a 12 gauge !

Posted 8 hours ago.

Did the 3 young soldiers on the French train have guns ? No ! But they were able to overpower the terrorist anyway !

Posted 8 hours ago.

We arent talking laws ! If there were none to buy then Mr Whack-job would have to go some other route !

Posted 8 hours ago.

Well as far as your "pointy stick" theory , I dont believe if one of these whack-jobs cornered 50 or so people he just wouldnt be to kill all of them with your pointy stick like he could with a military assault weapon !

Posted 8 hours ago.

Caspiansynn

Two things these psychos have in common , (1) they are all murderers and therefore are already breaking the law so new laws will have no affect on them, (2) they chose to attack gun free zones so they would not meet any resistance, more gun free zones means move victims.

Posted 8 hours ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or