Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
4 minutes ago.
by Kunectdots
BeRight
#1

Barack Obama Legacy

BBB

 
 

Member Comments

Shopsteward

And thats a fact

Posted 124 days ago.

Shopsteward

Yeah coal you absolutely can own artillery, in fact i have friends that own fully functional artillery pieces.

Posted 124 days ago.

Youre finally correct on one ! No functioning weapons ! And before you all start your crying , yes you can own a machine gun and fully automatic weapons BUT , you must be fully vetted and have a bank account that will withstand the cost of the licences !

Posted 124 days ago.

Shopsteward

Oh yeah u can own a tank but i believe it has to be de-militarized. No main gun for u (tank nazi)

Posted 125 days ago.

Coaluser

Watch Strange Inheritance with Jamie Colby. A dude died and left 42 tanks (Shermans, Bradleys etc). So yes you CAN own a Howitzer... I am gonna start charging you an education fee slinky..

Posted 125 days ago.

Shopsteward

GWB was a two term president no big deal, Republicans have power not seen since the Civil War thanks to Obumma, now if they would just use it

Posted 125 days ago.

Shopsteward

And you are correct Coal, the dems have lots hundreds of elections on all levels of Govt in the last two years

Posted 125 days ago.

Shopsteward

Coal, Republicans do indeed control the purse strings as you put it however they have yet to exercise that control. They are as bad a Dems in many respects

Posted 125 days ago.

Shopsteward

Shall not be infringed Fluffy , google the word(s) you dont understand ;)

Posted 125 days ago.

Oh I'm sorry if that makes your line of logic full of holes pervert troll !

Posted 125 days ago.

Shopsteward

Next will be nuke, Idiot

Posted 125 days ago.

Shopsteward

More liberal idiocy

Posted 125 days ago.

I suppose that if someone wanted to own a howitzer that he should be allowed to own it !

Posted 125 days ago.

Shopsteward

Case in point ;)

Posted 125 days ago.

It says the right to bear arms ,but it says nothing about what type of arms !Apparently you cant get that fact !

Posted 125 days ago.

Shopsteward

Dont know about you coal, but "shall not be infringed" seems pretty simple, some may have trouble with big words

Posted 125 days ago.

Shopsteward

Yeah coal that was very well phrased

Posted 125 days ago.

So wheres the outrage over that ?

Posted 125 days ago.

What you fail to realize there coaldust is there are multitudes of things one can do that you righties could consider one of your rights . But it says the right to bear arms ,but it says nothing about what type of arms ! And also you musta missed the fact that the republican "patriot act" is much more intrusive !

Posted 125 days ago.

Coaluser

OWO...while you feel you have been ordained to educate the ignorant, one must have skipped the classes on effective communication and social interaction. a better way of communicating your point can be just as effective. no oe much cares for the thought of losing a right or ablility to enjoy at ones leisure. that is the problem that many have wih intrusions. the end result as seen by many is an undue burden placed on the citizen. we all give up certain rights to "feel" safe. every distatseful action can beachieved in another fashion or form. much like the virus mutates, the adatability and ingenuity of man will devise another tool to effectly create the desired result. ball bearings do terrible damage....shall we all switch to roller?...oops...well they might tumble....quite the stumbling block.

Now that is poetry right there I tell ya... Well said my friend..

Posted 125 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or