Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
17 hours ago.
by slinky
BeRight
#1

Barack Obama Legacy

BBB

 
 

Member Comments

And it didnt matter what the majority wante dyou obstructed it anyway ! Typical selfish , egotistical whacko !

Posted 129 days ago.

Shopsteward

And when we saw "hope and change" defined it wasnt a good thing.

Posted 129 days ago.

Theres still plenty of hope , but you republinutz obstructed the change !

Posted 129 days ago.

Shopsteward

Watch out Kunnec when the socialist left says "common sense" gun restrictions, like "hope and change" it is an undefined and disaterous term.

Posted 129 days ago.

NasCarNut

just a bb gun, doesn't matter...

"under federal law, an imitation gun, when used in circumstances such as those described herein qualifies as a dangerous weapon," Rivera wrote in the arrest warrant. Rivera cited case law in which federal courts have ruled that toy guns and even unloaded guns fill the requirements for a dangerous weapon because they incite fear and a potentially deadly response from police, regardless of how the weapons could actually be used.

Posted 129 days ago.

Kunectdots

Keep up the good work, RALPH. It's hair- brained rants like yours that drives many to join the NRA. And, by your example, RALPH, "an education IS (obviously)required".

Posted 130 days ago.

Kunectdots

Well, it's Saturday night again. I hope the MOV can awaken to ANOTHER misinformed LTE in the Parkersburg News & Sentinel, from the 77 year-old, frequent contributor, residing in Parkersburg.

His blather is more amusing that what's found in the comic section. That's fictional. His is, unfortunately, functionally damning to even the semi-intelligent.

He posted an LTE (April 3,2016) entitled "Stand up to the NRA" and another entitled "An education is required" (April 17, 2016). In both instances he goes on a rant about gun ownership and his distaste for the influence of the NRA. He incorporates his opinion on "the recent shooting episode at the U.S. Capitol".

No one has apparently informed RALPH that the Nut-bar at "the U.S. Capitol" was using a BB/pellet gun. The NRA hasn't expressed an opinion upon their misuse, to my knowledge. (cont.)

Posted 130 days ago.

Coaluser

Here is the whole story that you deceptively chose not to post.ww w. governing. com /gov-data/safety-justice/gun-show-firearms-bankground-checks-state-laws-map.html

Posted 130 days ago.

Gun Show Background Checks State Laws. Known as the "gun show loophole," most states do not require background checks for firearms purchased at gun shows from private individuals

Posted 130 days ago.

They are supposed to .

Posted 130 days ago.

Coaluser

I dont take charity. I paid for my education and OJT.

Posted 130 days ago.

Shopsteward

Yep they run background checks

Posted 130 days ago.

moderation

A little free college would not have hurt you at all, coaldust.

Posted 130 days ago.

Thats the loop hole !

Posted 130 days ago.

BeRight

Dealers at gun shows have to d background checks don't they?

Posted 130 days ago.

Gun shows

Posted 130 days ago.

BeRight

By that way that was a serious question.

Posted 130 days ago.

BeRight

Which gun sellers are NOT required to subject buyers to background checks?

Posted 130 days ago.

Nascar , thats just the usual scare tactics of the right . We will hear it again and again in the coming months !

Posted 130 days ago.

NasCarNut

Donald Trump says he “heard” that President Obama “is thinking about signing an executive order where he wants to take your guns away,” claiming that he “read it in the papers.” None of the major newspapers in the country has reported that.

Here are the facts: The Washington Post reported that Obama is considering an executive order that would expand the number of gun sellers required to subject buyers to background checks. Such an action wouldn’t take anyone’s guns away.

And — separately — in the wake of mass shootings, Obama has mentioned Australia’s legislation on gun control, which did involve taking away some guns. But Obama has not indicated, nor has any major media outlet suggested, that he is even considering an executive order that involves confiscating guns.

Posted 130 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or