Now here you democrats are wanting to take thos rights away because of some dang evil crooks..
here's where you're wrong...we don't want your guns!!...why can't you get that through your head...yer dum
it is a sad statement to think that law enforcement is required at a public school.
sure is and that's what the NRA and coalbrain are suggesting...take it up with them..
Lets just go back to Reaguns assault weapon ban and reinstitute it ! You republinutz agreed to it then .
Preach on brutha Coal
And still your buddy Ronnie Reagun knew enough to restrict assault weapons ! Hmmmm !
I dang sure wouldn't cringe there saying we need to restrict guns ...
And just because someone at a shooting possessed a gun does not mean the entire CCW deal is a failure. There were 2 at Gabby Giffords shooting... They did NOT either one have a clear shot. Boy you idiot liberals would be crying foul if they too a bad shot and hurt someone else wouldn't you... CCW people are very conscientious and would very much regret hurting someone on accident... But if I had the misfortune of being in a crowd during a shooting, I would****sure pray someone, a hero with a gun would take that s. o. b out !!! Wouldn't you ??
Also guns helped the freed slaves fight off the democrats that wanted to re enslave them. That is why the NRA was formed in the first place. Look it up. Now here you democrats are wanting to take thos rights away because of some dang evil crooks.... Find some other way of dealing with the evil crooks. Guns and everyones rights are off limits period..
Here is THE deal with guns. Guns are THE weapon that freed the country from the British, conquered many territories (West), helped American warriors and patriots win many hard fought wars. They are the symbol of freedom in this country and have staved off many foreign attacks (gun behind every blade of grass comment). Anyone that wants to take over or destroy this country KNOWS that guns have to be removed first... They are ONE LEG of a 3 legged stool. It seems to oversimplify it but if only one leg could be removed, the entire stool would fall. This is a known fact. You liberals should not be damming guns but should be thankful that patriots have taken them up in use against tyrants or you would not be celebrating the liberties (such as free speech) that you enjoy today. Gun crime is down... Hard pill for you to swallow but the truth is for you liberals.
NRA Members would be called on to donate to new funds that would finance the NRA-related activities, and possibly, to directly assist schools in implementing the program. Also, many new opportunities would be available for trained School Resource Officers in your local community.
That was proposal. But we will never know since Biden and your traitors kicked it to the curb straight away.
NCN...how do we achieve the end goal of preventing misuse of a weapon? it is a sad statement to think that law enforcement is required at a public school. the psyche of the violent perpetrator unchecked will find their target and use whatever means necessary.
Why is the NRA afraid of the truth? The truth is there is no evidence that armed guards or police officers in schools make children safer. Columbine High School had an armed guard, and Virginia Tech had a full campus police force.
The NRA recommended that the Department of Homeland Security be designated as the lead agency, coordinating with the Departments of Education and Justice on federal programs and funding for school safety efforts.
they didn't offer sh!t except for "their coming to get your guns"...
Placing armed guards on every school campus across the country could cost more than $5 billion.
The Secret Service is charged by Title 18 Section 3056 with presidential protection, which includes keeping people who haven’t been screened beyond a security perimeter that’s established by the Secret Service.
the funding is B.S. because the NRA offered to foot the bill...
don't think so...they offered to pay for the study to devise a plan...next
If adopted, this NRA proposal would vastly expand the federal government’s involvement in both education and law enforcement, in violation of the Constitution, and make state and local governments even more subservient to Washington, D.C., politicians for funding. Our Constitution nowhere authorizes Congress to appropriate funds for police or schools, and for very good reason: Our Founding Fathers recognized an expansion of federal powers to these areas could, and most likely would, facilitate corruption and tyranny.
so which is it less government or more you want...
I ask you, does the Constitution mandate that we have armed guards at Fort Knox, armed guards in the Secret Service guarding our idiot president, or do we just do it because it is the most valued thing to guard? Are not our kids more valuable. The funding is B.S. because the NRA offered to foot the bill... So whats your next best shot at the NRA ?
OWO.....you got me with that one...that was as Uncle Eddie would say "Goooooood". yes the day is still young and there are plenty of toes to be stepped upon. you do have any names that you have bottled inside that you must expell? if so...let her rip. hey...i have to fold whites...what more can you do to me!!! hahaha
Stick around abby , the day is still young . lol
let's hope there's more sane folk show up at the voting booths..
sanity comes with many names.......i guess being called a dolt is not the worse thing i have ever been called.
700 Channel Lane , Marietta, OH 45750 | 740-373-2121